Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/17/net-wor ... table.html
Assuming a 4% withdrawal rate, that’s only $25k per year. And that assumes none of the net worth is tied up in a house.
To be fair, if you look at the underlying results, the survey respondents gave larger numbers for the amounts needed “for financial happiness” ($1.1M) and “to be wealthy” ($1.9M). Still, $624k is what they said is needed to be “comfortable,” not “survivable.” And 45% of the respondents (women) gave an average answer of only $325k (men’s average was $864k), which is only $13k a year at 4% withdrawal rate! Maybe they surveyed a disproportionate number of people with fat pensions.
Assuming a 4% withdrawal rate, that’s only $25k per year. And that assumes none of the net worth is tied up in a house.
To be fair, if you look at the underlying results, the survey respondents gave larger numbers for the amounts needed “for financial happiness” ($1.1M) and “to be wealthy” ($1.9M). Still, $624k is what they said is needed to be “comfortable,” not “survivable.” And 45% of the respondents (women) gave an average answer of only $325k (men’s average was $864k), which is only $13k a year at 4% withdrawal rate! Maybe they surveyed a disproportionate number of people with fat pensions.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
I'm not sure why you're mentioning a 4% withdrawal rate. The survey covered all age groups and wasn't about retirement. The question is so vague that I'm not sure what they were trying to measure.
-
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2018 12:29 pm
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
It's CNBC and they're just reporting on a basic survey done by Schwab. I didn't find the underlying survey that interesting or helpful.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
How many respondents do you think even know what the "4% rule" is/does? I think they're only looking at their answer as a large #, not necessarily what income it can produce.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
I wouldn’t consider myself “financially comfortable” unless I didn’t need to work. And I can’t imagine investable assets (let alone a net worth) of $624k producing enough income to allow very many people to live off of “comfortably,” especially considering the survey included people who are still working.
But I do agree with those who say the respondents didn’t put much thought into their numbers. At least I hope that’s the case.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
Check out this study on Median net worth by age - the HIGHEST median net worth is the 65-74 age group, $266k. When you consider this, $624k might seem low to you but is much higher than what most people have.
I think there's a bit of a disconnect sometimes on this forum - as it seems to attract fiscally responsible people, high earners, et al.
https://www.cnbc.com/select/average-net ... -65-to-74/
I think there's a bit of a disconnect sometimes on this forum - as it seems to attract fiscally responsible people, high earners, et al.
https://www.cnbc.com/select/average-net ... -65-to-74/
"The one who covets is the poorer man, |
For he would have that which he never can; |
But he who doesn't have and doesn't crave |
Is rich, though you may hold him but a knave." - Wife of Bath tale
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
Even though a lot of people don’t have $624k, I still would’ve thought they’d want more than that in order to live comfortably. That was what I found surprising.
So the disconnect isn’t even between people’s actual state of financial affairs, but their entire thinking (or perhaps, sadly, lack thereof) about what being financially independent, or even “a lot of money” means.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
That is a high bar.
Echoing the point that the question is far too vague, for most people, that kind of money pays of debt (including mortgage) with hundreds of thousands left over. I believe the figure. But comfortable retirement (absent a pension)? No. Much less early (or very early) comfortable retirement.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
And a lot of those high earners live in HCOL areas. So they perceive their "needs" differently. The $25K mentioned in the OP, coupled with a "35 year" Social Security benefit and a paid-off mortgage, could provide a comfortable life for about 80% of Americans.
It's not an engineering problem - Hersh Shefrin | To get the "risk premium", you really do have to take the risk - nisiprius
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
Of course, it’s been mentioned that there’s nothing scientific about this survey and it was not geared towards retirement per se.
But if we do apply it in a retirement context, that $624k might represent a median priced, paid-off home in a median cost of living area, plus $300k to generate $12k per year at a 4% WR.
Add in social security and you do have a very comfortable retirement. Not rich, but comfortable.
That standard of living is pretty close to paying for our current lifestyle, as it is now. We are very comfortable.
But if we do apply it in a retirement context, that $624k might represent a median priced, paid-off home in a median cost of living area, plus $300k to generate $12k per year at a 4% WR.
Add in social security and you do have a very comfortable retirement. Not rich, but comfortable.
That standard of living is pretty close to paying for our current lifestyle, as it is now. We are very comfortable.
-
- Posts: 1050
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2019 2:38 pm
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
+1. A lot of people can feel quite comfortable with a paid off mortgage, Social Security, and a little bit of extra cash buffer. There's no need to have a dismissive attitude towards this perspective just because it is not well represented on Bogleheads.David Jay wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 7:27 amAnd a lot of those high earners live in HCOL areas. So they perceive their "needs" differently. The $25K mentioned in the OP, coupled with a "35 year" Social Security benefit and a paid-off mortgage, could provide a comfortable life for about 80% of Americans.
In addition, a lot of young people would also feel comfortable with far less than a $600k+ net worth knowing that they still have a lot of human capital left. The survey did not say "comfortably retired" or anything like that. If you cannot even feel comfortable until you are fully financially independent, it makes for quite a slog to get there. I know we felt pretty comfortable once our student debt was paid off when our net worth was about $100k.
Global Market Portfolio + modest tilt towards volatility (80/20->60/40 as approach FI) + modest tilt away from exchange rate risk (80% global+20% U.S. stocks; currency-hedge bonds) + tax optimization
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
Much of how "financially comfortable" a person would be with a net worth of $624k depends upon the cost of living in the area where they live.
For example, I know quite a few retired folks in this area who have a net worth of significantly less than $624k and they very much enjoy their retirement without being reduced to eating beans and cornbread.
For example, take a couple who have a fully paid-for 3br/2ba $200k home, a fully paid-for reliable car, and combined social security of $2,500/mo. For many in that situation in a LCOL area and even a MCOL area, their social security payments alone would cover their basic monthly expenses, such as food, utilities, insurance, health care and so on. Add a portfolio of $400k and they now have extra funds for travel and other things.
So yes, it is absolutely possible for a person to be "financially comfortable" with a net worth of $624k. Will it sustain flying first class to Europe a few times a year, a brand new luxury car in the garage every three years or other similar lifestyle spending that many seem to think are "essential"? No. But a trip to the beach or the mountains for a week or so every year, driving or flying economy to visit family or friends, and a new well-appointed Camry or similar car every seven years or so? Certainly.
For example, I know quite a few retired folks in this area who have a net worth of significantly less than $624k and they very much enjoy their retirement without being reduced to eating beans and cornbread.
For example, take a couple who have a fully paid-for 3br/2ba $200k home, a fully paid-for reliable car, and combined social security of $2,500/mo. For many in that situation in a LCOL area and even a MCOL area, their social security payments alone would cover their basic monthly expenses, such as food, utilities, insurance, health care and so on. Add a portfolio of $400k and they now have extra funds for travel and other things.
So yes, it is absolutely possible for a person to be "financially comfortable" with a net worth of $624k. Will it sustain flying first class to Europe a few times a year, a brand new luxury car in the garage every three years or other similar lifestyle spending that many seem to think are "essential"? No. But a trip to the beach or the mountains for a week or so every year, driving or flying economy to visit family or friends, and a new well-appointed Camry or similar car every seven years or so? Certainly.
-
- Posts: 1424
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2015 8:18 pm
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
Nothing in the survey refers to retirement.
I have to laugh at the incredulity that $624K in a bank account for a working american is not "financially comfortable."
Nearly every "normal" person I know or am related to would be over-the-moon happy with $624K. Almost all their financial worries would evaporate. Admittedly, $624K for most of them might as well be $5M unless they win the lottery.
I have to laugh at the incredulity that $624K in a bank account for a working american is not "financially comfortable."
Nearly every "normal" person I know or am related to would be over-the-moon happy with $624K. Almost all their financial worries would evaporate. Admittedly, $624K for most of them might as well be $5M unless they win the lottery.
-
- Posts: 4816
- Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 4:44 pm
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
Net worth doesn't mean $624k in the bank account. It means total of all assets, including primary residence equity. A lot of people with high six figures to low seven figures net worth have a pretty high proportion in retirement accounts that can't be touched without penalty (I know I do).fortunefavored wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 7:54 am Nothing in the survey refers to retirement.
I have to laugh at the incredulity that $624K in a bank account for a working american is not "financially comfortable."
Nearly every "normal" person I know or am related to would be over-the-moon happy with $624K. Almost all their financial worries would evaporate. Admittedly, $624K for most of them might as well be $5M unless they win the lottery.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
If the person was roughly 70, with a roughly 20 year life expectancy, and had social security, sounds reasonable to me.
There's a lot of people on this board that are oblivious to what average levels of income people live on is.
If you coupled that with a pension and/or owning their primary residence, they're doing great relative to many retirees.
There's a lot of people on this board that are oblivious to what average levels of income people live on is.
If you coupled that with a pension and/or owning their primary residence, they're doing great relative to many retirees.
"To achieve satisfactory investment results is easier than most people realize; to achieve superior results is harder than it looks." - Benjamin Graham
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
Here is a link to the actual survey: https://content.schwab.com/web/retail/p ... ndings.pdf
-
- Posts: 15368
- Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:53 am
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
I wouldn't bet on the net worth of the my entire family (on both sides) combined exceeding $624k, and that includes both our parents and 9 adult siblings. My parents have close to $0 in savings, but nearly have their home paid off. I'm pretty sure they'll be fine on SS alone whenever they decide to retire.fortunefavored wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 7:54 am Nothing in the survey refers to retirement.
I have to laugh at the incredulity that $624K in a bank account for a working american is not "financially comfortable."
Nearly every "normal" person I know or am related to would be over-the-moon happy with $624K. Almost all their financial worries would evaporate. Admittedly, $624K for most of them might as well be $5M unless they win the lottery.
Like many (if not most) here, we hit 7-figures in our 30's, but let's not once again prove how disconnected Bogleheads are from the financial realities of most of the general public. A lot of people are "financially comfortable" even if their retirement doesn't include African safaris and Mediterranean cruises.
-
- Posts: 1424
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2015 8:18 pm
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
You can replace "in the bank" with "net worth" and my statement would still be correct for the population I refer to.alfaspider wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 8:02 amNet worth doesn't mean $624k in the bank account. It means total of all assets, including primary residence equity. A lot of people with high six figures to low seven figures net worth have a pretty high proportion in retirement accounts that can't be touched without penalty (I know I do).fortunefavored wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 7:54 am Nothing in the survey refers to retirement.
I have to laugh at the incredulity that $624K in a bank account for a working american is not "financially comfortable."
Nearly every "normal" person I know or am related to would be over-the-moon happy with $624K. Almost all their financial worries would evaporate. Admittedly, $624K for most of them might as well be $5M unless they win the lottery.
90% will likely go through life with negative net worth. Social security, part time work, shared housing & credit cards will be their retirement.
-
- Posts: 683
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2021 6:44 pm
- Location: Minnesota
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
This is interesting to me because I have just a little more than this amount in cash + investments.
I also have a paid off house + a 75% paid off rental house that cash flows. I live in a medium cost of living area.
NO WAY can I retire now. My goal is 10 years. I am not financially independent... but I am comfortable. So the word "comfortable" makes sense to me. Nothing wrong with the article.
I also have a paid off house + a 75% paid off rental house that cash flows. I live in a medium cost of living area.
NO WAY can I retire now. My goal is 10 years. I am not financially independent... but I am comfortable. So the word "comfortable" makes sense to me. Nothing wrong with the article.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
The survey says nothing about financial independence. $624k is just the average amount of money where the respondents would consider themselves to be on a good track financially. Presumably, they would at that point, not have concerns about debt, housing, or temporary loss of work.
In case it is of interest, respondents of the survey also said that on average, they would need $1.1 million to be "financially happy", and $1.9 million to be "wealthy".
In case it is of interest, respondents of the survey also said that on average, they would need $1.1 million to be "financially happy", and $1.9 million to be "wealthy".
-
- Posts: 4816
- Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 4:44 pm
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
I don't think the statistics bear out 90% having NEGATIVE net worth. But I do agree that the median person will never have over half a million in net worth. Income distribution in this (and many other) countries is pretty lopsided. Frame of reference has a pretty big impact. People often base their perceptions of wealth on those around them, and people tend to come into contact people like them. If I work at the Google headquarters, most of the people I talk to on a day to day basis make six figures and have significant wealth from stock. If I work at McDonalds, most people I talk to on a day to day basis are living hand to mouth. Neither the McDs worker nor the Google worker is seeing a true cross-section of society.fortunefavored wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 8:20 amYou can replace "in the bank" with "net worth" and my statement would still be correct for the population I refer to.alfaspider wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 8:02 amNet worth doesn't mean $624k in the bank account. It means total of all assets, including primary residence equity. A lot of people with high six figures to low seven figures net worth have a pretty high proportion in retirement accounts that can't be touched without penalty (I know I do).fortunefavored wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 7:54 am Nothing in the survey refers to retirement.
I have to laugh at the incredulity that $624K in a bank account for a working american is not "financially comfortable."
Nearly every "normal" person I know or am related to would be over-the-moon happy with $624K. Almost all their financial worries would evaporate. Admittedly, $624K for most of them might as well be $5M unless they win the lottery.
90% will likely go through life with negative net worth. Social security, part time work, shared housing & credit cards will be their retirement.
Keep in mind that the folks who post on boggleheads are generally at least in the top 10% of wealth accumulation, and a significant portion are in the top 1-2%. People who don't have wealth to invest tend not to look for internet discussions on investing- doubly so an investment forum built around a philosophy of slow and steady accumulation rather than wild get rich quick bets (like wallstreet bets).
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
The study results state that the sample of 1000 respondents were "nationally representative of the US population." I take that to mean that younger people are more represented than people at or near retirement age.
As someone with roughly that net worth and 20+ years until social security is an option, I feel very comfortable letting time do its thing with the funds that I have, even if I stopped contributing tomorrow.
Also, the fine print on page 13:" Q.1: At what level of personal net worth would you say a person in your area could be considered financially comfortable?" It would take a pretty hefty study to normalize for location, so you gotta kind of take the thing for what it's worth.
As someone with roughly that net worth and 20+ years until social security is an option, I feel very comfortable letting time do its thing with the funds that I have, even if I stopped contributing tomorrow.
Also, the fine print on page 13:" Q.1: At what level of personal net worth would you say a person in your area could be considered financially comfortable?" It would take a pretty hefty study to normalize for location, so you gotta kind of take the thing for what it's worth.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
This is a wonderful forum. However, it does provide a skewed view of financial reality as compared to many non-Bogleheads.
Also, as was mentioned earlier "where you live" has a huge impact on how much you'll need to be "comfortable".
Your financial obligations (mortgage, college expenses for kids, supporting elderly parents, etc.) also are a major consideration.
Based on this, $624k might be a lot, just right or not enough.
Also, as was mentioned earlier "where you live" has a huge impact on how much you'll need to be "comfortable".
Your financial obligations (mortgage, college expenses for kids, supporting elderly parents, etc.) also are a major consideration.
Based on this, $624k might be a lot, just right or not enough.
- backofbeyond
- Posts: 480
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 1:07 pm
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
Having several recently retired friends and family members, the odd thing that struck me is how many of them don't plan on touching the principal of their next egg in retirement. It physically seem to cause them pain to watch their portfolio go down. Many (most?) have taken part time jobs that pay 1/5 of what their career jobs were, simply to stay above their orginal retirement portfolio number. My best friend earns $20k a year at a part time job (20 hrs a week) when a single good day in the market would equate to the same amount earned.
Even more odd, is most of them have very successful children that have no need for any of mom & dad's inheirentance. My hunch is that a draining portfolio gives some evidence of a mortal life and that the clock is ticking. But what do I know?
Even more odd, is most of them have very successful children that have no need for any of mom & dad's inheirentance. My hunch is that a draining portfolio gives some evidence of a mortal life and that the clock is ticking. But what do I know?
The question isn't at what age I want to retire, it is at what income. - George Foreman
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
I understand what you mean, but keep in mind that around half of Americans can't lay their hands on $400 without going into debt (I'm dead serious). $600k+ is far more money than what well over 100 million Americans will ever have. The median net worth of 65-69 years olds is barely over $200k, meaning that half have even less than that.
This may not be true of you, but many here don't realize how incredibly wealthy they really are compared to typical Americans.
The Sensible Steward
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
So many Bogleheads are out of touch by so far that they don't even realize that they're out of touch.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
Yeah it's easy to get immersed in FIRE and 4% SWR and such and lose touch with how most people live. Many make do on social security or work paycheck to paycheck to barely make ends meet. 624K is beyond the wildest dreams of a good part of the US population. Though if you throw in the imputed value of social security and Medicare and such people do have more than they think.willthrill81 wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 10:19 amI understand what you mean, but keep in mind that around half of Americans can't lay their hands on $400 without going into debt (I'm dead serious). $600k+ is far more money than what well over 100 million Americans will ever have. The median net worth of 65-69 years olds is barely over $200k, meaning that half have even less than that.
This may not be true of you, but many here don't realize how incredibly wealthy they really are compared to typical Americans.
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
And even then, most here are far more in touch than some, like Sam Dogen (aka the 'Financial Samurai'), who claimed not long ago that his family could not live comfortably on $250k of annual income in San Francisco.
The Sensible Steward
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
Agreed. His articles are like watching wrestling back in the 90’s. Some people might think it’s real, but it’s definitely not.willthrill81 wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 10:32 amAnd even then, most here are far more in touch than some, like Sam Dogen (aka the 'Financial Samurai'), who claimed not long ago that his family could not live comfortably on $250k of annual income in San Francisco.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
I don't think he claimed that he couldn't live comfortably, just that $250k provided a "typical" middle class lifestyle at the time along with maxing out tax-advantaged accounts. BTW, with the (further) rise in real estate prices since that article came out, the new budget is $400k/year.willthrill81 wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 10:32 amAnd even then, most here are far more in touch than some, like Sam Dogen (aka the 'Financial Samurai'), who claimed not long ago that his family could not live comfortably on $250k of annual income in San Francisco.
https://www.financialsamurai.com/400k-income/
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
what does financially comfortable mean? im late 20s and my networth is less than than and im financially comfortable by my definition. Im not stressed about money at all. I have an EF, no debt, disability and life insurance for me and my spouse, 529 for kids to come, nice house, and our expenses way lower than our income.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
It depends on age. I would imagine that for almost anyone in their 70s being financially comfortable would mean not having to work. But for someone in their 40s and younger, VERY few would define financial comfort that way.
Last edited by sawhorse on Tue May 18, 2021 12:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
I'm pretty sure that he used the 'cannot live comfortably' statement, though I cannot find it at the moment. However, it's splitting hairs at this point. He's already said that you cannot live a 'middle class' lifestyle on under $350k, and I guess the mark is now $400k. And all of that is despite the fact that $350k is probably about triple the median household income for San Francisco.mervinj7 wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 11:45 amI don't think he claimed that he couldn't live comfortably, just that $250k provided a "typical" middle class lifestyle at the time along with maxing out tax-advantaged accounts. BTW, with the (further) rise in real estate prices since that article came out, the new budget is $400k/year.willthrill81 wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 10:32 amAnd even then, most here are far more in touch than some, like Sam Dogen (aka the 'Financial Samurai'), who claimed not long ago that his family could not live comfortably on $250k of annual income in San Francisco.
https://www.financialsamurai.com/400k-income/
He's living in a bubble with a relatively tiny proportion of the population that is almost incomprehensible to those outside the bubble.
The Sensible Steward
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
I agree. We are most definitely financially comfortable, but we're at least a decade away from being FI.
The Sensible Steward
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
+1
I live in a VHCOL area on the left coast and we are doing quite well using just $24-27K of IRA withdrawals along with our SS in meeting our expenses. The expected RMD, starting next year, will be near double that, We also have a pile of Roth $ between near 20 years of max contributions + modest yearly conversions.
-
- Posts: 1171
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:43 am
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
That number sounds somewhere between high-and-reasonable to me, especially for a retiree. Many, many people are fine with a paid-off house, social security, Medicare, and a small amount of savings (many more don't even have that.) That's not going to keep you flying to Europe or buying Teslas, but it allows you a nice vacation to visit the grandkids, a Camry, the ability to keep up your house, pursue most hobbies, and spring for the fancy cable package. A lot of the comforts of life aren't that expensive.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
Sounds about right to me. Assume a couple has paid off their mortgage so housing expenses are low. In most places outside of HCOL areas, one could pretty easily live on $50K-$60K per year. With SS for a couple of about the average ~$18K/year each, and $25K per year from portfolio that gives a reasonably comfortable retirement. Not extravagant mind you, but certainly comfortable. And, if necessary, such a couple could tap into home equity with a HECM for additional income.grogu wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 12:34 am https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/17/net-wor ... table.html
Assuming a 4% withdrawal rate, that’s only $25k per year. And that assumes none of the net worth is tied up in a house.
To be fair, if you look at the underlying results, the survey respondents gave larger numbers for the amounts needed “for financial happiness” ($1.1M) and “to be wealthy” ($1.9M). Still, $624k is what they said is needed to be “comfortable,” not “survivable.” And 45% of the respondents (women) gave an average answer of only $325k (men’s average was $864k), which is only $13k a year at 4% withdrawal rate! Maybe they surveyed a disproportionate number of people with fat pensions.
Wrench
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
You never feel/felt "financially comfortable" while progressing in your career?!?grogu wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 6:46 amI wouldn’t consider myself “financially comfortable” unless I didn’t need to work. And I can’t imagine investable assets (let alone a net worth) of $624k producing enough income to allow very many people to live off of “comfortably,” especially considering the survey included people who are still working.
But I do agree with those who say the respondents didn’t put much thought into their numbers. At least I hope that’s the case.
The $624k seems about in the right ballpark to me.
Looking back, when I got to about $500k in invested assets, I felt pretty comfortable. I had a good paying job, but knew I had sufficient assets that I could leave it if things went south and live comfortably while I searched for the next opportunity that was right for my career. I didn't need to have the full retirement "number" in place to feel comfortable, because I still plenty of human capital left.
Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
I agree, '4% rule' is shoehorning the answer to a fuzzy question into a popular theme on this forum but not as much generally. The actual question 'At what level of personal net worth would you say a person in your area could be considered financially comfortable?' is not even asking directly what the person thinks about their own situation, and 'upon retirement' is not in there either.
Averaging all parts of the country (there's an obviously big overrepresentation here of the San Fran area, maybe other expensive areas too, besides overrepresentation of well off people generally), I'd say $600k+, including home equity, is not surprising. That's several times times the national household median, though slightly below the (less meaningful) average. Also despite the question nominally being about other people, respondents tend to think of people like themselves when answering. So as one good but extreme example here in the inner NY area, you often hear people (though outsiders tend to exaggerate it more) saying you need $250k, $500k/yr income or some other ridiculous number, to be 'middle class' in NY. But actually the median income in the City is only slightly above the national median. But I guess if you asked people here who are college educated and work white collar jobs in Manhattan they'd answer >>$600k. They would probably not fully factor in the few million people in their 'town' who live in rent stabilized or public housing, live in part on public benefits/subsidies in their working years, will live basically exclusively on public benefits in retirement if their income situation doesn't improve later in working years, and who in general will get by.
-
- Posts: 15368
- Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:53 am
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
"Average" total household expenses in the U.S. are ~$63k/yr https://www.thebalance.com/breakdown-of ... es-4687519. That includes housing, things like childcare, and usually feeding more than two mouths. $50-$60k for two with minimized housing expenses is a pretty high standard of living for most, in most of the country.Wrench wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 1:58 pmSounds about right to me. Assume a couple has paid off their mortgage so housing expenses are low. In most places outside of HCOL areas, one could pretty easily live on $50K-$60K per year. With SS for a couple of about the average ~$18K/year each, and $25K per year from portfolio that gives a reasonably comfortable retirement. Not extravagant mind you, but certainly comfortable. And, if necessary, such a couple could tap into home equity with a HECM for additional income.grogu wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 12:34 am https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/17/net-wor ... table.html
Assuming a 4% withdrawal rate, that’s only $25k per year. And that assumes none of the net worth is tied up in a house.
To be fair, if you look at the underlying results, the survey respondents gave larger numbers for the amounts needed “for financial happiness” ($1.1M) and “to be wealthy” ($1.9M). Still, $624k is what they said is needed to be “comfortable,” not “survivable.” And 45% of the respondents (women) gave an average answer of only $325k (men’s average was $864k), which is only $13k a year at 4% withdrawal rate! Maybe they surveyed a disproportionate number of people with fat pensions.
Wrench
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
I guess the definition of "financially comfortable" is malleable. I've been "financially comfortable" my whole life. Including when in graduate school and not making lots of money. I had enough money to live on and was fine with my standard of living. I was confident in my ability to continue to earn enough money to continue to be satisfied with my standard of living and to have enough to retire on. And did end up doing OK and retiring early. I guess part of my being "comfortable" was that my parents, while not ultra wealthy, had enough money that should I have fallen on hard times I had a backstop. Never happened, but I guess knowing that help is there if needed is part of being comfortable that many people don't have.grogu wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 6:46 amI wouldn’t consider myself “financially comfortable” unless I didn’t need to work. And I can’t imagine investable assets (let alone a net worth) of $624k producing enough income to allow very many people to live off of “comfortably,” especially considering the survey included people who are still working.
But I do agree with those who say the respondents didn’t put much thought into their numbers. At least I hope that’s the case.
-
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 11:13 am
- Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
Those numbers align almost perfectly with my own thoughts on the matter. I crossed $600k net worth in December, and 'comfortable' is exactly how I described it. That doesn't mean I'm ready to quit my job today and live off my savings; it means I'm no longer worried day and night about my finances. I can take a 50% pay cut tomorrow, not save another dollar for the rest of my life, and still pay off my mortgage and let compounded gains earn me a comfortable retirement at age 67. Obviously that doesn't mean I want to take a 50% pay cut, or stop saving, but it takes a lot of pressure off of me.grogu wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 12:34 am https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/17/net-wor ... table.html
Assuming a 4% withdrawal rate, that’s only $25k per year. And that assumes none of the net worth is tied up in a house.
To be fair, if you look at the underlying results, the survey respondents gave larger numbers for the amounts needed “for financial happiness” ($1.1M) and “to be wealthy” ($1.9M). Still, $624k is what they said is needed to be “comfortable,” not “survivable.” And 45% of the respondents (women) gave an average answer of only $325k (men’s average was $864k), which is only $13k a year at 4% withdrawal rate! Maybe they surveyed a disproportionate number of people with fat pensions.
If I had $1.1M at my current age (44), I'd continue to work and save while de-risking my portfolio. It's not enough to feel comfortable retiring immediately, but I'd be very happy.
If I had $1.9M, I'd retire immediately because, yes, that would make me wealthy enough to live a life of complete leisure.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
The top 10% of US families held 3/4 of all the wealth: https://www.stlouisfed.org/open-vault/2 ... statistics
My guess is that the overwhelming majority of poster on this forum are in that group, or will be before they retire.
To make it into the top 50%, a family needed wealth of $122,000 or more.
So $624,000 is a dream for most families in our country.
My guess is that the overwhelming majority of poster on this forum are in that group, or will be before they retire.
To make it into the top 50%, a family needed wealth of $122,000 or more.
So $624,000 is a dream for most families in our country.
One thing that humbles me deeply is to see that human genius has its limits while human stupidity does not. - Alexandre Dumas, fils
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
While I don't doubt the truth of your statement for you personally, I sincerely doubt that's how the poll responders took it. Personally, I felt "financially comfortable" when I made $37k per year and had student loan debt of >$100k. Why? Because I had a good job and knew I was performing well enough to continue getting promotions and raises. I think "financially comfortable" means you can pay your bills, have a little fun, buy a car when you need it and survive an emergency without incurring debt. Net worth has nothing to do with it.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
I'm always blown away when I read those occasional news stories about waitstaff getting tipped $2k for a water or something like that. The thing that surprises me is how they often say that the money will completely change their life. I could understand if they were sending the money abroad to a poorer country or something, but for those living in the US, as much as I respect their gratitude and financial hardship, I really can't imagine a situation in which a nominal amount of a few thousand dollars could be that life-changing. I suppose someone whose income is barely enough to service their debt interest would see the most significant improvement from a small cash injection, but that assumes they don't go and spend up to their credit limit again right after, which often seems to be the case. It's sad, but I think so many people agree just extremely financially illiterate, even despite having sufficient education and intelligence to understand the issues. Anyone with even just the ability to save a little bit each paycheck will eventually get to $2k of savings and beyond, but it's like there's a mental block that doesn't allow people to prioritize savings. Virtually every one of those stories ends with the money basically being spent before it's counted.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
I think the Boglehead community in general is oblivious to how the rest of the world lives. There are a lot of people in this country who live pay check to pay check, if they get a pay check at all. They feel fortunate if they have enough money to buy food and pay the rent. They are short term thinkers by necessity. To them $624k is all the money in the world. In their view that amount of money would solve all their problems.
Slow and steady wins the race.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
Well the average millennial has a net worth of $18k so, $624k probably sounds pretty good to them at least.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
That 200k networth is mostly their home.willthrill81 wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 10:19 amI understand what you mean, but keep in mind that around half of Americans can't lay their hands on $400 without going into debt (I'm dead serious). $600k+ is far more money than what well over 100 million Americans will ever have. The median net worth of 65-69 years olds is barely over $200k, meaning that half have even less than that.
This may not be true of you, but many here don't realize how incredibly wealthy they really are compared to typical Americans.
Stocks-80% || Bonds-20% || Taxable-VTI/VXUS || IRA-VT/BNDW
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
Well, that was his number for a family to live a "middle class lifestyle" in SF. Which probably isn't far off, given that the poverty level is $117,400 for a family of four in SF (2018 HUD figure).willthrill81 wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 10:32 amAnd even then, most here are far more in touch than some, like Sam Dogen (aka the 'Financial Samurai'), who claimed not long ago that his family could not live comfortably on $250k of annual income in San Francisco.
Re: Schwab survey: Net worth of $624k is all that's needed to be “financially comfortable”
And how much more they spend than the average American. A lot of people on this board think they are low spenders when in reality they live more extravagantly than the average American (because they can comfortably afford to).willthrill81 wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 10:19 amI understand what you mean, but keep in mind that around half of Americans can't lay their hands on $400 without going into debt (I'm dead serious). $600k+ is far more money than what well over 100 million Americans will ever have. The median net worth of 65-69 years olds is barely over $200k, meaning that half have even less than that.
This may not be true of you, but many here don't realize how incredibly wealthy they really are compared to typical Americans.