When to take Social Security
When to take Social Security
Ok I'm a few years out before Retirement and having conversations regarding Social Security. My plan is to wait til I'm 70 and get the extra $1000. per month vs taking it at 66 and 2 months. The question is do any of you feel that Uncle Sam may change the rules effecting Soc Security and if I take it at 66 and 2 months I'd be Grandfathered in and exempt from any changes. I know this may sound crazy; but nowadays I feel that in this crazy world anything can happen.
Thanks for your thoughts.
David
Thanks for your thoughts.
David
Re: When to take Social Security
I think you should wait until 70 if you can afford to.
There is no guarantee that you would be grandfathered in if the rules changed.
If a law about changing the rules was being debated, that would probably give you several months of lead time to act, before any such law passed.
There is no guarantee that you would be grandfathered in if the rules changed.
If a law about changing the rules was being debated, that would probably give you several months of lead time to act, before any such law passed.
- ruralavalon
- Posts: 26351
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:29 am
- Location: Illinois
Re: When to take Social Security
I have no idea whether Congress will change the law. We get a new Congress every two years, so it's hard to guess what people who haven't been elected yet might want to do.Dkells4 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 6:48 pm Ok I'm a few years out before Retirement and having conversations regarding Social Security. My plan is to wait til I'm 70 and get the extra $1000. per month vs taking it at 66 and 2 months. The question is do any of you feel that Uncle Sam may change the rules effecting Soc Security and if I take it at 66 and 2 months I'd be Grandfathered in and exempt from any changes. I know this may sound crazy; but nowadays I feel that in this crazy world anything can happen.
Thanks for your thoughts.
David
In general if in good health it's usually better to wait to start Social Security.
"Everything should be as simple as it is, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein |
Wiki article link: Bogleheads® investment philosophy
Re: When to take Social Security
This thread is now in the Personal Finance (Not Investing) forum (Social Security).
The whole point of the policy is to (1) eliminate contentious disagreements that result from these discussions and (2) keep investors from making bad decisions. Proposed legislation changes many times between the time it's introduced and signed into law.
We do permit discussions which plan for reductions in Social Security, but not about the future of Social Security itself (political conjecture).
For the record, Social Security is authorized under US law (legislation). Speculation about future legislation (what "might" happen) is prohibited by forum policy, see: Unacceptable Topics
This forum is focused on investing that is directly actionable to personal investors. We don't hold debates on conjecture.Politics and Religion
In order to avoid the inevitable frictions that arise from these topics, political or religious posts and comments are prohibited. The only exceptions to this rule are:
- Common religious expressions such as sending your prayers to an ailing member.
- Usage of factual and non-derogatory political labels when necessary to the discussion at hand.
- Discussions about enacted laws or regulations that affect the individual investor. Note that discussions of proposed legislation are prohibited.
- Proposed regulations that are directly related to investing may be discussed if and when they are published for public comments.
The whole point of the policy is to (1) eliminate contentious disagreements that result from these discussions and (2) keep investors from making bad decisions. Proposed legislation changes many times between the time it's introduced and signed into law.
We do permit discussions which plan for reductions in Social Security, but not about the future of Social Security itself (political conjecture).
Re: When to take Social Security
Uncle Sam may change the rules in some way that you wouldn't like.
You may be grandfathered so that the changes don't affect you.
Or not.
One thing is certain: if you delay until 70 you will maximize your monthly benefits under the current rules. And if you have a lower-earning spouse, delaying your benefits until 70 will maximize eventual survivor benefits under the current rules.
Everything else is pure speculation.
For me, I plan using the current rules until they actually change, not some unspecified rule changes with the added speculation that grandfathering might prevent their impact.
This isn't just my wallet. It's an organizer, a memory and an old friend.
Re: When to take Social Security
If you have concerns about "rule changes" for Social Security you should likely take benefits as early as possible. If the rules change they can't take away what you have already received.
The closest helping hand is at the end of your own arm.
-
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 8:46 am
Re: When to take Social Security
Yes, it sounds crazy to ask. Anybody who gives you an opinion on this has no clue. They essentially are pulling their opinion out of a certain dark and smelly place that shall not be named. If you take any actions solely based upon said opinions, then you are as foolish as the fools offering an opinion on things that they know nothing about.Dkells4 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 6:48 pm Ok I'm a few years out before Retirement and having conversations regarding Social Security. My plan is to wait til I'm 70 and get the extra $1000. per month vs taking it at 66 and 2 months. The question is do any of you feel that Uncle Sam may change the rules effecting Soc Security and if I take it at 66 and 2 months I'd be Grandfathered in and exempt from any changes. I know this may sound crazy; but nowadays I feel that in this crazy world anything can happen.
Thanks for your thoughts.
David
I would use Open Social Security to help you evaluate options, and make a decision based upon that, your expected health, your retirement needs... the usual factors.
Sorry for the tough love, but you asked for thoughts. So there's mine.
EDIT: You mention something about "being grandfathered in". That is also foolish speculation. There is nothing in the US Constitution which says "thou shalt be grandfathered into your Social Security" as far as I know. That said, I am not a Constitutional lawyer so I may have missed that particular clause.
Last edited by humblecoder on Wed Apr 14, 2021 8:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: When to take Social Security
What is your scheduled death date?
The “when” is trivial after that.
The “when” is trivial after that.
Old fart who does three index stock funds, baby.
-
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2017 12:57 pm
Re: When to take Social Security
You're a few years out, so you can plan and, if necessary, make changes based on what is better known in a couple of years. Running opensocialsecurity models for different retirement scenarios will help you evaluate your options. For my case, the difference in lifetime benefits between taking it at 69 and 70 are not that significant (purely a subjective evaluation which could change), affecting my own thinking. Of course, you need your scheduled death date for accuracy.Dkells4 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 6:48 pm Ok I'm a few years out before Retirement and having conversations regarding Social Security. My plan is to wait til I'm 70 and get the extra $1000. per month vs taking it at 66 and 2 months. The question is do any of you feel that Uncle Sam may change the rules effecting Soc Security and if I take it at 66 and 2 months I'd be Grandfathered in and exempt from any changes. I know this may sound crazy; but nowadays I feel that in this crazy world anything can happen.
Thanks for your thoughts.
David
While not speculating about what the laws/rules/regulations will be in a few years, I find it hard to believe that the bureaucrats and lawmakers truly want the publicity of an army of old folks in wheelchairs and hospital beds storming the capital, demanding their Social Security benefits be restored. But then again, I'm not a government employee!
- vanbogle59
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2021 7:30 pm
Re: When to take Social Security
The SSA has an army of highly-paid actuaries who actively try to set things up so it doesn't matter (on average) when you take your withdrawals.
Are an outlier to their "average"?
If yes, go with that.
If no, unless those guys are bad at their jobs, it doesn't matter what you decide (on average).
Are an outlier to their "average"?
If yes, go with that.
If no, unless those guys are bad at their jobs, it doesn't matter what you decide (on average).
-
- Posts: 6393
- Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 6:27 pm
Re: When to take Social Security
This is not the case, for several reasons. The formula has not changed in years, so it was based on shorter life expectancies. And because the benefit for every year you wait is the same dollar amount, waiting longer becomes less valuable because it gives you a lower percentage gain for fewer years. If your FRA is 66 and your benefit at 66 would be $20,000, waiting until 67 gives you $21,600, an 8% increase. Waiting until 68 gives you $23,200, which is an 8% increase based on the age-66 benefit but only 7.4% of the age-67 benefit, and you get the extra benefit for one less year.vanbogle59 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 9:53 pm The SSA has an army of highly-paid actuaries who actively try to set things up so it doesn't matter (on average) when you take your withdrawals.
The net effect is that single men of average life expectancy maximize their expected value by claiming at 68 or 69, depending on interest rates; the benefit at age 69, if invested in TIPS (since SS is indexed to inflation), will cover the difference between age-69 and age-70 benefits for longer than the benefit is expected to last. (Even then, waiting may be desirable, since it gives you more money if you have more time to need it for spending.) Men of above-average life expectancy, women of average life expectancy, and anyone with a lower-earning spouse maximizes expected value by waiting all the way until 70.
- vanbogle59
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2021 7:30 pm
Re: When to take Social Security
"This is not the case, for several reasons." - I'm listening
"The formula has not changed in years" - agreed
"so it was based on shorter life expectancies." - Um, maybe. Not so sure. US life expectancy is not exactly sky-rocketing. Has the needle actually moved?
"And..." - now you list all they stuff the actuaries actually built to encourage delay
"The net effect is that single men of average life expectancy maximize their expected value by claiming at 68 or 69," - I am full age at 67+, so this is trivial....
"Men of above-average life expectancy," - Not to quibble, but it's the actual longer life, not the expectancy that matters. Nevertheless, if you are an exception...
"women of average life expectancy" - This may be a genuine free lunch. I'm not sure
"and anyone with a lower-earning spouse maximizes expected value by waiting all the way until 70." - I agree in the case of a married couple, the higher earner should wait if the trailing spouse will claim spousal benefits (as opposed to just claiming their own). With 2 tries, you have a better chance to beat the average.
All of this, of course, assumes this income stream is competing with liquid assets that can be tapped without adding risk to the portfolio during the delay.
"The formula has not changed in years" - agreed
"so it was based on shorter life expectancies." - Um, maybe. Not so sure. US life expectancy is not exactly sky-rocketing. Has the needle actually moved?
"And..." - now you list all they stuff the actuaries actually built to encourage delay
"The net effect is that single men of average life expectancy maximize their expected value by claiming at 68 or 69," - I am full age at 67+, so this is trivial....
"Men of above-average life expectancy," - Not to quibble, but it's the actual longer life, not the expectancy that matters. Nevertheless, if you are an exception...
"women of average life expectancy" - This may be a genuine free lunch. I'm not sure
"and anyone with a lower-earning spouse maximizes expected value by waiting all the way until 70." - I agree in the case of a married couple, the higher earner should wait if the trailing spouse will claim spousal benefits (as opposed to just claiming their own). With 2 tries, you have a better chance to beat the average.
All of this, of course, assumes this income stream is competing with liquid assets that can be tapped without adding risk to the portfolio during the delay.