Same for me with policies from two different major companies. Buying excess underlying insurance did not increase the coverage. Thus, every penny of extra premium was wasted.neilpilot wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 8:53 am
I'm happy if that's true in your case. Have you confirmed that with your agent(s)?
I can definitely say it was NOT the case when I discussed it with my agent. He made it clear that any auto or home liability coverage above the limits set by the umbrella policy was not additive to the excess liability's policy limits. In other words, if I kept my auto coverage at $1M (if only $300k was required), then my auto & $1M umbrella would not equate to $2M of total coverage.
Umbrella Policy; Anyone actually made a claim?
Re: Umbrella Policy; Anyone actually made a claim?
We don't know how to beat the market on a risk-adjusted basis, and we don't know anyone that does know either |
--Swedroe |
We assume that markets are efficient, that prices are right |
--Fama
-
- Posts: 9881
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:57 pm
- Location: Milky Way
Re: Umbrella Policy; Anyone actually made a claim?
Ever hear of Pascal's wager? The reason you would elect to pay the $20k in lifetime insurance premiums is to prevent the possibility of a catastrophic loss. That is what insurance is for. You cite the 0.0001% chance of paying 20k to a lawyer, but not the comparable chance of losing everything.knightrider wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:11 amThis example kind of proves why you don't need umbrella insurance. Over your lifetime you may pay close to 20k in premiums for your umbrella policy. That is close to the same amount as hiring a lawyer to negotiate a settlement that is within the limits of the car policy.quantAndHold wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:09 pm I have the opposite. Multimillionaire friend who didn’t have umbrella, who got into a car accident and got sued for $2m. Car insurance company was perfectly willing to go to court and risk the entire $2m, because they were only on the hook for $100k. Friend had to hire and pay their own lawyer $20k and spend a year getting the insurance company and plaintiff to negotiate a settlement that was within the limits of the car policy.
So why pick 100% chance of paying 20k/lifetime in premiums over 0.0001% chance of paying 20k via hiring a lawyer?
Best regards, -Op |
|
"In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity." Einstein
Re: Umbrella Policy; Anyone actually made a claim?
FYI: You would be paying a lot more than $20,000 in legal fees.chance of paying 20k to a lawyer
Re: Umbrella Policy; Anyone actually made a claim?
In most states, USAA offers a 20% discount on the first $1 million of umbrella if your underlying policy has a $500k limit instead of a $300k limit.
Re: Umbrella Policy; Anyone actually made a claim?
neilpilot wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 8:53 am I can definitely say it was NOT the case when I discussed it with my agent. He made it clear that any auto or home liability coverage above the limits set by the umbrella policy was not additive to the excess liability's policy limits. In other words, if I kept my auto coverage at $1M (if only $300k was required), then my auto & $1M umbrella would not equate to $2M of total coverage.
Most insurance companies write their umbrella policies to sit on top of the actual underlying policy, not on top of the required limits on the underlying policy. $1 million of primary auto liability plus $1 million of umbrella would add up to $2 million of total coverage for automobile liability.
Your policy may be different, but don't rely on what the agent tells you. The agent is a salesman, not an expert on the policy language. Read the policy to see where the coverage begins and ends.
For example, the State Farm umbrella policy sits on top of the actual underlying policy:
14. “retained limit” means the sum of:
a. the amount paid or payable by any other insurance policy for the loss;
...
If a claim is made or suit is brought against an insured for damages because of a loss for which the insured is legally liable and to which this policy applies, we will pay on behalf of the insured, the damages that exceed the retained limit. The most we will pay for such loss is the Coverage L Limit of Liability, ...
Re: Umbrella Policy; Anyone actually made a claim?
Many people aren't at risk of losing everything. In the worst case of having to file Chapter 7 in MA, you would get to keep your 401k or equivalent, IRAs up to $1.36 million, and with proper planning up to $500k in home equity.Call_Me_Op wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 1:05 pm You cite the 0.0001% chance of paying 20k to a lawyer, but not the comparable chance of losing everything.
-
- Posts: 9881
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:57 pm
- Location: Milky Way
Re: Umbrella Policy; Anyone actually made a claim?
OK, I can refine the statement to replace "everything" with "all unprotected assets, including future income." Doesn't change the point.oldfort wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 6:16 pmMany people aren't at risk of losing everything. In the worst case of having to file Chapter 7 in MA, you would get to keep your 401k or equivalent, IRAs up to $1.36 million, and with proper planning up to $500k in home equity.Call_Me_Op wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 1:05 pm You cite the 0.0001% chance of paying 20k to a lawyer, but not the comparable chance of losing everything.
Best regards, -Op |
|
"In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity." Einstein
Re: Umbrella Policy; Anyone actually made a claim?
Yep. Most of us don't want to lose our unprotected assets, which makes umbrella insurance a great investment.Call_Me_Op wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:42 amOK, I can refine the statement to replace "everything" with "all unprotected assets, including future income." Doesn't change the point.oldfort wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 6:16 pmMany people aren't at risk of losing everything. In the worst case of having to file Chapter 7 in MA, you would get to keep your 401k or equivalent, IRAs up to $1.36 million, and with proper planning up to $500k in home equity.Call_Me_Op wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 1:05 pm You cite the 0.0001% chance of paying 20k to a lawyer, but not the comparable chance of losing everything.
I am not a lawyer, accountant or financial advisor. Any advice or suggestions that I may provide shall be considered for entertainment purposes only.
Re: Umbrella Policy; Anyone actually made a claim?
All future income in Chapter 7 can be thought as exempt or protected with a few exceptions for non-dischargeable debts: ex. driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol.Call_Me_Op wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:42 amOK, I can refine the statement to replace "everything" with "all unprotected assets, including future income." Doesn't change the point.oldfort wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 6:16 pmMany people aren't at risk of losing everything. In the worst case of having to file Chapter 7 in MA, you would get to keep your 401k or equivalent, IRAs up to $1.36 million, and with proper planning up to $500k in home equity.Call_Me_Op wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 1:05 pm You cite the 0.0001% chance of paying 20k to a lawyer, but not the comparable chance of losing everything.
-
- Posts: 1225
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 11:20 am
Re: Umbrella Policy; Anyone actually made a claim?
The 20k lawyer is going to ensure you don't lose everything. The 20k lawyer will also make sure you don't even lose your unprotected assets at least in the example described earlier..Call_Me_Op wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 1:05 pm Ever hear of Pascal's wager? The reason you would elect to pay the $20k in lifetime insurance premiums is to prevent the possibility of a catastrophic loss. That is what insurance is for. You cite the 0.0001% chance of paying 20k to a lawyer, but not the comparable chance of losing everything.
Last edited by knightrider on Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Umbrella Policy; Anyone actually made a claim?
That is not how these policies are written. They will indemnify you up to the 1 million limit in excess of any payouts of the primary policy. You do not get an excess 1 million dollars, you get 1 million in secondary liability insurance, which means they will pay out any damages in excess of the underlying up to 1 million dollars.tj wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 8:40 amOf course it buys you more coverage. Having a $1M umbrella does not increase your coverage from 300k, it adds an additional $1M, meaning of your underlying is $1M you have $2M of coverage instead of 1.3M.neilpilot wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:27 amObviously I don’t know your policy details. When I first purchased umbrella coverage decades ago my agent explained that excess liability limits in the underlying policies was simply a waste of money. It didn’t buy me additional coverage or reduce my umbrella premium. Maybe your umbrella is cheaper as a result but you should check. I suspect you are simply paying more than you could for your homeowners and auto.
Here's Allstate's readable condensed explanation with infographics:
https://www.allstate.com/resources/alls ... simple.pdf
Re: Umbrella Policy; Anyone actually made a claim?
That is exactly what the post said. $1 million of primary liability (underlying policy) + $1 million of excess liability (umbrella) = $2 million of total liability insurance.Lee_WSP wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:38 amThat is not how these policies are written. They will indemnify you up to the 1 million limit in excess of any payouts of the primary policy. You do not get an excess 1 million dollars, you get 1 million in secondary liability insurance, which means they will pay out any damages in excess of the underlying up to 1 million dollars.
Here's Allstate's readable condensed explanation with infographics:
https://www.allstate.com/resources/alls ... simple.pdf
"Excess" means secondary, and "underlying" means primary.
Re: Umbrella Policy; Anyone actually made a claim?
Are there any other policies/ actions that may fall into the bucket of “ i wish i had subscription to…xyz” after the fact?quantAndHold wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:09 pmThe bottom line is most people never need to use their umbrella policy, but the consequences of not having an umbrella policy are potentially life changing.
Life changing items Medical, life, umbrella, auto, home insurance. Any less obvious ones that give peace of mind?
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Umbrella Policy; Anyone actually made a claim?
Disability and flood insurance come to mind.Aggieland wrote: ↑Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:32 amAre there any other policies/ actions that may fall into the bucket of “ i wish i had subscription to…xyz” after the fact?quantAndHold wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:09 pmThe bottom line is most people never need to use their umbrella policy, but the consequences of not having an umbrella policy are potentially life changing.
Life changing items Medical, life, umbrella, auto, home insurance. Any less obvious ones that give peace of mind?
The Sensible Steward
Re: Umbrella Policy; Anyone actually made a claim?
Also earthquake insurance, depending on where you live.willthrill81 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:46 amDisability and flood insurance come to mind.Aggieland wrote: ↑Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:32 amAre there any other policies/ actions that may fall into the bucket of “ i wish i had subscription to…xyz” after the fact?quantAndHold wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:09 pmThe bottom line is most people never need to use their umbrella policy, but the consequences of not having an umbrella policy are potentially life changing.
Life changing items Medical, life, umbrella, auto, home insurance. Any less obvious ones that give peace of mind?
Retired life insurance company financial executive who sincerely believes that ”It’s a GREAT day to be alive!”