Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
I've seen a few comments on the net on NFTs.
Apparently they are a more serious investment than Bitcoin.
Anyone invest in them and what are your thoughts on them?
Apparently they are a more serious investment than Bitcoin.
Anyone invest in them and what are your thoughts on them?
Success does not bring happiness. In fact, happiness IS success. |
'There are only two tragedies in life: one is not getting what one wants, and the other is getting it.' Oscar Wilde
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
I'm planning on buying the exact number of those that John Bogle had.
VTI 48%, VXUS 12%, BND 40%
-
- Posts: 2697
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 6:38 pm
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
"Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?"
No, I am not.
No, I am not.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
I own some Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, but I truly do not understand most of the NFTs I have seen. If anyone does, I'd love to hear an argument for / why I should care about them. It's also possible I'm just not the target market here.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Are we in a bubble yet?
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
More serious than Bitcoin? I guess, if you take art and baseball cards seriously.
1 fund
-
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 11:27 am
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Do you mean you don't understand specific NFTs/NFT categories or the whole concept of investing in an NFT ?
Given the long history of investing in collectibles (art, books, comic books) and the problems of provenance, I'd say that NFT investing seems more firmly grounded than bitcoin or some other cryptocurrency investing. But I'm sure there'll be a glut and a collapse at some point.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
I'm waiting for Boglecoin to come out.
30% US Stocks | 30% Int Stocks | 40% Bonds
-
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:35 am
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
If an NFT actually gave me ownership of something I really wanted, I'd consider it. Haven't figure out why I'd want to own online art yet, which seems to be a lot of the current offerings.
I do wonder how they will expand to professional sports. There seems to be a lot of interest from the leagues and players in creating NFTs.
I do wonder how they will expand to professional sports. There seems to be a lot of interest from the leagues and players in creating NFTs.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Are we talking about digital trading cards like in this recent thread?
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=337741
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=337741
- arcticpineapplecorp.
- Posts: 15081
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:22 pm
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
considering "The historic Nyan Cat was turned into an NFT and sold for $600,000", I'd say definitely yes.
It's hard to accept the truth when the lies were exactly what you wanted to hear. Investing is simple, but not easy. Buy, hold & rebalance low cost index funds & manage taxable events. Asking Portfolio Questions |
- nisiprius
- Advisory Board
- Posts: 52219
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:33 am
- Location: The terrestrial, globular, planetary hunk of matter, flattened at the poles, is my abode.--O. Henry
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
What I gather from this article is that:
1) There's a fee.
2) A high fee.On most major digital art marketplaces, there are fees associated with turning your content into an NFT. I'll speak more on that later, but in the meantime, you'll need to purchase some Ethereum (ETH) to cover the costs of creating your first NFT.
3) The author of the article created one and it is for sale for 0.012 ETH = $18 as I write this.Why is it so expensive to create NFTs?
Turning a piece of content into an NFT requires a new one-of-a-kind digital coin to be minted on the blockchain. The creation of this coin requires a fairly complex computational task involving an entire network of computers.
In other words, the article title is "How to Create and Sell your First NFT Token," but all that is actually covered in the article is
- How to pay fees.
I feel that there should be more to it, somehow, than paying fees, but that seems to be the end of the article.
Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Specifically, I don't understand the current market, where people are buying and reselling images, sports game videos, etc. Ownership of the item gives you.. nothing. You don't get the rights to resell the actual video to tv networks, you don't seem to really own anything besides something that someone else might want to pay you money for. I will admit, I don't get pokemon cards, baseball cards, etc (I somewhat can get art).SlowMovingInvestor wrote: ↑Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:22 pmDo you mean you don't understand specific NFTs/NFT categories or the whole concept of investing in an NFT ?
Given the long history of investing in collectibles (art, books, comic books) and the problems of provenance, I'd say that NFT investing seems more firmly grounded than bitcoin or some other cryptocurrency investing. But I'm sure there'll be a glut and a collapse at some point.
-
- Posts: 10433
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 5:57 pm
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
This is one of the stupidest things I've ever seen.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Its like paying for a one-time use coupon code, except that it has no value.
-
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 11:27 am
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
I believe you can resell some NFTs, in some cases, the original owner gets a portion of the sale price. It's whatever is specified in the smart contract.
Honestly, I think a lot of applications don't really need blockchain. But for 'art' with it's provenance and theft issues, a distributed ledger can be really useful. Indeed, it makes more sense than paying for something available in 10s of millions, like most/all crypto-tokens (including BTC).
And it can mean the original artist reaps some benefit from resales.
Honestly, I think a lot of applications don't really need blockchain. But for 'art' with it's provenance and theft issues, a distributed ledger can be really useful. Indeed, it makes more sense than paying for something available in 10s of millions, like most/all crypto-tokens (including BTC).
And it can mean the original artist reaps some benefit from resales.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Yes there are valid and useful applications for NFTs. Yes people are making insane amount of money on them. Yes they have value as people are willing to pay for them. No this isn’t the right forum to discuss them.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Fees are high on Ethereum lately. Though minting NFT’s for $40 that are sold for hundreds of thousands is probably not a big concern. Ethereum scaling is set to grow by orders of magnitude this month via Optimism layer2.nisiprius wrote: ↑Tue Mar 02, 2021 8:38 pmWhat I gather from this article is that:
1) There's a fee.2) A high fee.On most major digital art marketplaces, there are fees associated with turning your content into an NFT. I'll speak more on that later, but in the meantime, you'll need to purchase some Ethereum (ETH) to cover the costs of creating your first NFT.3) The author of the article created one and it is for sale for 0.012 ETH = $18 as I write this.Why is it so expensive to create NFTs?
Turning a piece of content into an NFT requires a new one-of-a-kind digital coin to be minted on the blockchain. The creation of this coin requires a fairly complex computational task involving an entire network of computers.
In other words, the article title is "How to Create and Sell your First NFT Token," but all that is actually covered in the article is
Mostly the article is an overview of three different ways to pay fees, and five different places you can pay them to.
- How to pay fees.
I feel that there should be more to it, somehow, than paying fees, but that seems to be the end of the article.
NFTs are minted on other blockchains though for pennies. The very popular NBA authentic NFTs are on a different chain for example.
The easiest analogy I have heard for people to understand NFT value is sports cards. You can copy a sports card but it will be worthless. This applies to any art I suppose as well. NFTs convey ownership, licensing and authenticity.
Mark Cuban is quite hyped on the tech and has pointed out it will translate to things like intellectual property. Really the applications are endless. And for the crypto space it’s more advertising as popular people advertise their ventures into the space.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
How are these taxed?
Global stocks, IG/HY bonds, gold & digital assets at market weights 75% / 19% / 6% || LMP: TIPS ladder
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Is ‘invest’ the right verb?
Global stocks, IG/HY bonds, gold & digital assets at market weights 75% / 19% / 6% || LMP: TIPS ladder
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Can you suggest a good forum for people who don't have much knowledge in Tech?
Success does not bring happiness. In fact, happiness IS success. |
'There are only two tragedies in life: one is not getting what one wants, and the other is getting it.' Oscar Wilde
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Late to the thread but I'll offer the best wisdom I've heard on questions like these.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QuSuKcrAeU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ac7G7xOG2Ag
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QuSuKcrAeU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ac7G7xOG2Ag
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
- Tinkerer-in-Chief
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2020 4:20 pm
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Based solely on this thread, it strikes me that NFTs are a clever way of making trust-less, decentralised deeds and titles. This uses the technology to solve a real problem, and can make the transaction costs worth it for the benefit the token provides.
What sort of investment will reflect the use value of these tokens, though? Underlying governance tokens? ETH? The sports teams, auction houses, artists and other businesses able to potentially benefit from the technology’s usefulness?
I’m not sure of the answers to those questions, and one needs to be when weighing the risk/reward of this technology. Interested to hear others thoughts.
What sort of investment will reflect the use value of these tokens, though? Underlying governance tokens? ETH? The sports teams, auction houses, artists and other businesses able to potentially benefit from the technology’s usefulness?
I’m not sure of the answers to those questions, and one needs to be when weighing the risk/reward of this technology. Interested to hear others thoughts.
This space intentionally left blank.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
I think I understand so far, but please correct me if I am wrong, is that non fungible tokens will make you the owner of things on the digital space like digital art.
However copies which are exactly the same ss the original are available for free on the net for everyone to enjoy.
So being the owner doesn't give you any advantage apart from being able to say that you are the owner.
I mean if you own a Raphael and you'll hang it in your living room you will be able to enjoy it and all copies whether by hand or digital would be inferior so they would not give you the same enjoyment.
But since in digital art copies are exactly the same as the original being the owner doesn't mean much as far as I understand. What do you think?
However copies which are exactly the same ss the original are available for free on the net for everyone to enjoy.
So being the owner doesn't give you any advantage apart from being able to say that you are the owner.
I mean if you own a Raphael and you'll hang it in your living room you will be able to enjoy it and all copies whether by hand or digital would be inferior so they would not give you the same enjoyment.
But since in digital art copies are exactly the same as the original being the owner doesn't mean much as far as I understand. What do you think?
Success does not bring happiness. In fact, happiness IS success. |
'There are only two tragedies in life: one is not getting what one wants, and the other is getting it.' Oscar Wilde
-
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:18 pm
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Maybe this is useful for professional photographers? Just store all your images on a website and let companies take what they want and then pay for it with NFTs.
If a private user "steals" the image, there's no harm done since that private user would never pay for it anyway.
But if a website copies the image, it should be easier for the original photographer to take him to court and use the NFT to prove that he has ownership of the original.
In this way, NFTs can potentially allow the photographers to bypass Getty Images and other resellers.
If a private user "steals" the image, there's no harm done since that private user would never pay for it anyway.
But if a website copies the image, it should be easier for the original photographer to take him to court and use the NFT to prove that he has ownership of the original.
In this way, NFTs can potentially allow the photographers to bypass Getty Images and other resellers.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
It's an interesting space and very useful tech. Think of royalties for anything. Now McGraw-hill can continue to screw students by ensuring royalties are embedded into the contracts.
If one were to get involved it's probably not on the token side, but more an equity investment and getting your hands dirty with potential projects and teams.
If one were to get involved it's probably not on the token side, but more an equity investment and getting your hands dirty with potential projects and teams.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Good point. But like you say if you are a private user I would see no point in owning the picture since you can just enjoy looking at it without buying it.mmcmonster wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 4:51 am Maybe this is useful for professional photographers? Just store all your images on a website and let companies take what they want and then pay for it with NFTs.
If a private user "steals" the image, there's no harm done since that private user would never pay for it anyway.
But if a website copies the image, it should be easier for the original photographer to take him to court and use the NFT to prove that he has ownership of the original.
In this way, NFTs can potentially allow the photographers to bypass Getty Images and other resellers.
It's not like the Vatican owning the Sistine Chapel, since looking at the original frescoes by Michelangelo is clearly different from looking at pictures of it.
With the digital work of a photographer you get the same experience whether you own it or not.
Success does not bring happiness. In fact, happiness IS success. |
'There are only two tragedies in life: one is not getting what one wants, and the other is getting it.' Oscar Wilde
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
I just updated my list of "Things I'll Never Invest In"
1) Timeshare
2) Bitcoin
3) NFT
1) Timeshare
2) Bitcoin
3) NFT
"I look at a hundred deals a day. I pick one." -Gordon Gekko
- TomatoTomahto
- Posts: 17158
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:48 pm
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
I get the FI part but not the RE part of FIRE.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
I agree on timeshare. Don't know enough about the other two yet
Success does not bring happiness. In fact, happiness IS success. |
'There are only two tragedies in life: one is not getting what one wants, and the other is getting it.' Oscar Wilde
-
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 5:07 pm
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
The disproportionate amount of electrical energy consumed by this enterprise has... how can I put this neutrally... hidden costs.
-
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 11:27 am
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
There's already technology to digitally watermark a photo. The problem isn't establishing ownership (which is the only thing blockchain really does for you), but finding unauthorized usage and issuing takedowns (blockchain doesn't really help with that).mmcmonster wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 4:51 am Maybe this is useful for professional photographers? Just store all your images on a website and let companies take what they want and then pay for it with NFTs.
If a private user "steals" the image, there's no harm done since that private user would never pay for it anyway.
But if a website copies the image, it should be easier for the original photographer to take him to court and use the NFT to prove that he has ownership of the original.
In this way, NFTs can potentially allow the photographers to bypass Getty Images and other resellers.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
I'm in the same place, except that I understand physical collectible cards a little bit. There can be enjoyment from viewing a collectible that you own, and the physicality gives you the ability to exclude others by virtue of your possession of it.qwerty123 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 02, 2021 8:53 pm Specifically, I don't understand the current market, where people are buying and reselling images, sports game videos, etc. Ownership of the item gives you.. nothing. You don't get the rights to resell the actual video to tv networks, you don't seem to really own anything besides something that someone else might want to pay you money for. I will admit, I don't get pokemon cards, baseball cards, etc (I somewhat can get art).
Likewise, I understand the potential of NFTs for art and music. I saw a discussion of one drum riff NFT that included the unlimited rights to reproduce, use, and sample the drum riff. The value is not in the NFT itself, but in the collection of legal rights attached to it. And that could also work for digital art. An NFT could allow an artist to import the exclusivity offered by physicality into the digital world. An artist could grant a single owner of a digital painting NFT total ownership with the right to reproduce and create derivative works—similar to the buyer of a single physical painting—or grant a set of owners limited rights to reproduce for personal use—similar to the buyers of a limited edition print ("One of only 500 made!").
What I don't understand is something like the NBA Top Shot market. I don't see the value in being one of 15,000 "owners" of a "Moment" who have no more ability to enjoy the "Moment" than I do as a "non-owner." The NFT doesn't seem to reflect any bundle of meaningful rights.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Yeah, if the NFT grants ownership or usage rights, it makes a lot more sense to me. It would be neat to be able to buy music, movies etc via NFTs, and then be able to play the music / movie on any platform of your choosing (rather than the current model where you "own" the ability to play the movie / music on the platform you purchased it on, but cannot movie it around, and are screwed if the platform doesn't renew it's license to play the media).jhfenton wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:47 am Likewise, I understand the potential of NFTs for art and music. I saw a discussion of one drum riff NFT that included the unlimited rights to reproduce, use, and sample the drum riff. The value is not in the NFT itself, but in the collection of legal rights attached to it. And that could also work for digital art. An NFT could allow an artist to import the exclusivity offered by physicality into the digital world. An artist could grant a single owner of a digital painting NFT total ownership with the right to reproduce and create derivative works—similar to the buyer of a single physical painting—or grant a set of owners limited rights to reproduce for personal use—similar to the buyers of a limited edition print ("One of only 500 made!").
What I don't understand is something like the NBA Top Shot market. I don't see the value in being one of 15,000 "owners" of a "Moment" who have no more ability to enjoy the "Moment" than I do as a "non-owner." The NFT doesn't seem to reflect any bundle of meaningful rights.
I actually had a similar discussion about NBA Top Shot recently. My friend is making very good money trading them (his realized gains are >> the money he originally put in), but I still do not understand the market at all. In the past I traded "MLB Champions" on Ethereum, and made money, but the remaining players I have are basically worth nothing now - they moved to a new platform, and as far as I can tell, just gave up on the old Ethereum based version.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
I'd be really pissed if someone stole my picture of a banana taped to something. This reminds of that old 10cc song.SlowMovingInvestor wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:35 amThere's already technology to digitally watermark a photo. The problem isn't establishing ownership (which is the only thing blockchain really does for you), but finding unauthorized usage and issuing takedowns (blockchain doesn't really help with that).mmcmonster wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 4:51 am Maybe this is useful for professional photographers? Just store all your images on a website and let companies take what they want and then pay for it with NFTs.
If a private user "steals" the image, there's no harm done since that private user would never pay for it anyway.
But if a website copies the image, it should be easier for the original photographer to take him to court and use the NFT to prove that he has ownership of the original.
In this way, NFTs can potentially allow the photographers to bypass Getty Images and other resellers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7dgRxpx6XY
Art for art's sake, money for God's sake.
-
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 11:27 am
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Virtual Sneaker NFTs too had a very successful auction a few days ago.
I think NFTs make sense for some types of 'art' and collectibles (maybe more so than many cryptocurrencies), but virtual sneakers ..
And digital pets too ..
I think NFTs make sense for some types of 'art' and collectibles (maybe more so than many cryptocurrencies), but virtual sneakers ..
And digital pets too ..
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Deleted - I misattributed the creator of the banana.
Last edited by alpenglow on Thu Mar 04, 2021 8:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
I think that NFTs are *amazing* for artists and other creators who are trying to make a living in a digital world.
I collect art prints as well as vinyl records from independent labels. I don't need more physical items in my house and I will happily collect NFT versions of the same if artists that I am a fan of offer them at comparable prices. I am not sure if that is possible at the moment because of transaction costs.
As an investment, I don't speculate on collectibles and I'm not going to start now
-
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:19 pm
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Mark Cuban said they were good, so that just about settles it right?
Basically it is digital art that the owner has a blockchain record of, and as such it cannot be replicated or forged. Baseball cards, art, and just random images have been seen selling for thousands and even tens of thousands of dollars. It all sounds insane to me. But people are paying the prices.
Now years could pass and we may simply view this fad as the 2020s version of Beanie Babies or baseball cards in the 90s...but at least for the time being its happening on real levels.
For the record I own none...but find it fascinating to at least be aware of.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Cryptocurrencies use proof-of-work to award the next block, aka mining, aka energy; and you're 100% correct on that frontribonucleic wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:08 am The disproportionate amount of electrical energy consumed by this enterprise has... how can I put this neutrally... hidden costs.
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56012952
Not all blockchain utilizes proof-of-work to maintain the database; but it does consume storage, so that's a concern.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/blockchain.asp
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockchain
Bottom line, NFT doesn't have to consume energy to be a viable and secure implementation of blockchain.
That said, NFT is digital Cabbage Patch Dolls regardless of what it's applied to; aka false scarcity. But worse, because literally anyone can copy the thing, and the only difference is the missing digital "certificate of authenticity" which itself is meaningless in the digital world.
Without getting into a debate about the relative worth of a real, painted by their own hand, painting like a Van Gogh, Rembrandt, Etc, at least those are real physical items that someone can say were the physical item touched by the painter as opposed to a painted copy or print. No such tangible difference exists with an NFT'ed "object" except for the people who decide 00101000110001 is inferior to 00101000110001 + 0001 where the 0001 is the NFT bit (example highly simplified of course, but that's what it basically is).
And maybe that really will take off as a thing as there is no shortage of people who crave to be able to say they own a thing no one else does. So long as that desire exists, so will markets for "scarce" items; false or not.
Last edited by mouth on Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Serious question: if you are a fan of an artist, and want to give them money in recognition of their work and talent, why is an NFT important? You still have the same zeros and ones, they still have your money. Heck, there is literally no difference to you copying it from a friend and then sending money to the artist. And NFT has zero impact on digital copying other than it lacking the ability for someone to say "this is mine and there is a record to prove it"ccf wrote: ↑Thu Mar 04, 2021 8:29 amI think that NFTs are *amazing* for artists and other creators who are trying to make a living in a digital world.
I collect art prints as well as vinyl records from independent labels. I don't need more physical items in my house and I will happily collect NFT versions of the same if artists that I am a fan of offer them at comparable prices. I am not sure if that is possible at the moment because of transaction costs.
As an investment, I don't speculate on collectibles and I'm not going to start now
What is the real value to you of having another series of zeros and ones that are registered in a database as belonging to you for an item that is also verifiably identical to the version without the NFT attached to it?
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Sometimes I do just send money to artists, if they have a way to do that, but more often than not I buy the thing that I want to pay them for. Sometimes it is something I want, like a print. Sometimes it is not something I do not want, like digital music downloads.mouth wrote: ↑Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:04 am Serious question: if you are a fan of an artist, and want to give them money in recognition of their work and talent, why is an NFT important? You still have the same zeros and ones, they still have your money. Heck, there is literally no difference to you copying it from a friend and then sending money to the artist.
For prints, there isn't really a market (today) for supporting artists by purchasing high resolution digital prints that I could print and frame. I would love that as I like to rotate the art in my house. I wouldn't have to store them and I could print them on my large format printer in whatever size I like. I hope that NFTs create that market.
For music, I would love to be able to pay for music in a way where that "owned" music will be accessible to me regardless of what formats and streaming services exist in the future. If I could have an app with my music and album covers and liner notes and a music collection that would work on a variety of platforms now and in the future, because it could verify my ownership, I would be so happy. Same for books and poetry and comics and 3d printer designs. I will stop buying ebooks from Amazon as soon as I possibly can.
I think that these things are going to happen and that NFTs will create a new type of "digital ownership" in contrast to where we are today where everything feels like platform lock-in. I also think that NFTs will change the game when it comes to royalties for using artists' work.
Right now, NFTs are not very mainstream and I haven't seen any creatives that I follow using them apart from Robin Sloan's experiment: see "A Coat Check Ticket, A Magic Spell" https://society.robinsloan.com/archive/art-objects/
So yeah - the technology is exciting, and I understand why high profile artists like Beeple are making huge sales, but I don't understand all of the speculation on random digital art. It's just a form of beanie babies. An artist that I follow on Instagram sold 100 prints on one of the NFT platforms the other day. She only has a few thousand followers on Instagram but because it was promoted on the platform, people were buying 3,4,5 copies. It's hard to imagine that people will be able to unload them for more money later.
I would not speculate on NFTs or on the success of any of the platforms that currently offer them. The exciting part is the idea and the blockchain that enables the idea. So far I have bid on one print but could not get it for the price that I was willing to pay. I also tried an NFT based video game.
Last edited by ccf on Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
I have also seen a few threads and articles about things like digital playing cards and art.
They have ALL been about how you might be able to make a gazillion dollars by buying them and then getting lucky.
I have never once seen anyone say something like, "I am a basketball fan and I love having this digital playing card just so that I can enjoy looking at it."
The total lack of non-financial interest in them is telling and to me makes them basically look like poker chips to gamble with.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
I should create a Boglecoin.
It would be a semi-stable coin backed, by 70% Total Market and 30% Total Bond.
But, if I market it just right, it will sell for 10x NAV!
After all, it is going to be worth more in the future!
Last edited by Patzer on Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
A fair position particularly on the concept of NFT fostering a market to benefit artists. Time will tell. I'm not convinced it will be transformative in the way you hope. I don't see how NFT solves the problem of connecting artists to people willing to pay for their art. Today that problem can be solved by an artist having a webpage, presence on social media, and a means to accept payment at a commercially viable price that doesn't drive most people to just copy it. Remember NFT does nothing to prevent copying, it only serves to assert provenance and ownership.ccf wrote: ↑Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:23 amSometimes I do just send money to artists, if they have a way to do that, but more often than not I buy the thing that I want to pay them for. Sometimes it is something I want, like a print. Sometimes it is not something I do not want, like digital music downloads.mouth wrote: ↑Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:04 am Serious question: if you are a fan of an artist, and want to give them money in recognition of their work and talent, why is an NFT important? You still have the same zeros and ones, they still have your money. Heck, there is literally no difference to you copying it from a friend and then sending money to the artist.
For prints, there isn't really a market (today) for supporting artists by purchasing high resolution digital prints that I could print and frame. I would love that as I like to rotate the art in my house. I wouldn't have to store them and I could print them on my large format printer in whatever size I like. I hope that NFTs create that market.
For music, I would love to be able to pay for music in a way where that "owned" music will be accessible to me regardless of what formats and streaming services exist in the future. If I could have an app with my music and album covers and liner notes and a music collection that would work on a variety of platforms now and in the future, because it could verify my ownership, I would be so happy. Same for books and poetry and comics and 3d printer designs. I will stop buying ebooks from Amazon as soon as I possibly can.
I think that these things are going to happen and that NFTs will create a new type of "digital ownership" in contrast to where we are today where everything feels like platform lock-in. I also think that NFTs will change the game when it comes to royalties for using artists' work.
Right now, NFTs are not very mainstream and I haven't seen any creatives that I follow using them apart from Robin Sloan's experiment: see "A Coat Check Ticket, A Magic Spell" https://society.robinsloan.com/archive/art-objects/
So yeah - the technology is exciting, and I understand why high profile artists like Beeple are making huge sales, but I don't understand all of the speculation on random digital art. It's just a form of beanie babies. An artist that I follow on Instagram sold 100 prints on one of the NFT platforms the other day. She only has a few thousand followers on Instagram but because it was promoted on the platform, people were buying 3,4,5 copies. It's hard to imagine that people will be able to unload them for more money later.
I would not speculate on NFTs or on the success of any of the platforms that currently offer them. The exciting part is the idea and the blockchain that enables the idea. So far I have bid on one print but could not get it for the price that I was willing to pay. I also tried an NFT based video game.
But like I said, time will tell and I could be wrong. It doesn't have to solve the above problems 100%; anything that moves the needle can be helpful if there aren't 2nd order impacts.
Of course the "investment" situation and insane values is an entirely different topic and is the literal definition of false scarcity and novelty. It'll take a LOT of evidence to prove otherwise. I wonder if this would be even half the thing it is right now sans COVID lockdown.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
Some people are really stubborn when it comes to anything new. NFTs have loads of use cases. It bogles my mind that one can accept cardboard prints of baseball players being worth loads of money or literal rocks, but NFTs are too hard to comprehend.
Re: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): anyone investing in those?
My hope, and this is very rose-colored glasses, is that a mechanism for digital goods ownership and provenance will make it possible to separate the distribution platform from the content.
For example, imagine a producer of hardware ereader or ereader software or a music player that does not have to concern themselves with selling content, licensing, or royalties. A consumer that has portability and choice that they didn't have before.
For example, imagine a producer of hardware ereader or ereader software or a music player that does not have to concern themselves with selling content, licensing, or royalties. A consumer that has portability and choice that they didn't have before.
Last edited by ccf on Thu Mar 04, 2021 10:28 am, edited 2 times in total.