Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
-
- Posts: 4207
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:52 am
- Location: Houston
Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Just went to facebook.com and my site was all messed up.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Well, I don't know much about IPOs, but I believe that Facebook will go into rapid decline soon. Thier arrogance in thinking they can do whatever they want and
a billion sheep will just go along will do them in. I know that I'm seriously thinking about cancelling this week. FB is 98% a waste of time in my opinion.
a billion sheep will just go along will do them in. I know that I'm seriously thinking about cancelling this week. FB is 98% a waste of time in my opinion.
- paddyshack
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 4:49 pm
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
So is 98% of what is on Television, yet not many have found a way to quit that.mikeast wrote: FB is 98% a waste of time in my opinion.
Facebook has access to an audience 4X the audience the Superbowl gets, every day. They made a billion in profit last year with under 3000 employees. They scare the leadership at Google.
When you have nearing a billion people interested in your service, half of whom spend 8 hrs/week on average at your destination, you've accomplished something. They may indeed be a flash in the pan, but they clearly have made radical changes in how people interact in society and that won't be reversed, only altered moving foward. I'm no FB fan, but I get that there is good reason for all the clamor.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Welcome to bogleheads Mark.natureexplorer wrote:Just went to facebook.com and my site was all messed up.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
IPO's in general have a rather poor history. Big hat, little cattle syndrome.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
This discussion shows a disconnect between generations. If you have children, ask them about FB.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
If you would have asked me to invest in FB in 2005,6,7,8 I would have said no, simply because I am a small minded guy: have no vision and am risk adverse. But this company is the future, like it or not. The leadership has been brilliant!natureexplorer wrote:Just went to facebook.com and my site was all messed up.
Erwin
- paddyshack
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 4:49 pm
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Buying them in 2005 could have gotten you a something like a 10,000x return. Good thing nobody did ask you then, you'd be really kicking yourselfmpt follower wrote:If you would have asked me to invest in FB in 2005,6,7,8 I would have said no, simply because I am a small minded guy: have no vision and am risk adverse. But this company is the future, like it or not. The leadership has been brilliant!natureexplorer wrote:Just went to facebook.com and my site was all messed up.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ayday.html
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Facebook will be the next Myspace in a couple of years. Maybe even the next AOL. Both of them are now insignificant after being at the top.
In the age of the internet, something else ALWAYS comes along, and people flock from one service to another.
In the age of the internet, something else ALWAYS comes along, and people flock from one service to another.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
The next big thing will be total immersion virtual worlds (similar to the tv series Caprica). I think it is pretty horrible for society, but if I can locate that company in the next few years and they allow me to put in $5000, I would take the risk that it would be a 1000x bagger. Of course there is some chance it would be an existing company like Facebook, Google, Apple...
-
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:41 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
MySpace's failure was in allowing people to have extreme customization of their personal page.TJAJ9 wrote:Facebook will be the next Myspace in a couple of years. Maybe even the next AOL. Both of them are now insignificant after being at the top.
In the age of the internet, something else ALWAYS comes along, and people flock from one service to another.
The problem was, 99.99999999% of people have no concept of web design, even if given a WYSIWYG. Thats why people were being paid to design professional pages and make templates, but majority of the time that was just never done.
There was no consistency or functionality that would link peoples profiles and everything they did together, it required the user to update things which is just a stupid PITA. FaceBooks interface is evolving to keep things connected and auto-updated when things occur, this is crucial and is mostly what drove people away from what became a horrendous ghetto at MySpace. Being able to blast any old MIDI when you visited a page, injecting HTML drive-by virus' etc became its huge downfall. There comes a point where letting people modify their own page unleashes a beast you cannot control and if you try to reign it in...well, everyone leaves in droves so they left it open until it became the Internets ghetto.
AOL went into rapid decline for one reason only: They never adapted to the Internet. It took *forever* for AOL to give their users a decent Internet connection, even over the modem. They required users to have AOL software to act as a gateway to the Internet over the AOL MegaProxy which basically made even the fastest modem connections crap.
AOL only began changing in the last few years as they realized their main and largest revenue source was finally in its death decline (subscriptions via dialup). The HuffPo deal was and is a last ditch effort and that was practically DOA.
FaceBook will survive because as already stated, its a central, easy to use portal that can provide directed, meaningful and mass advertisement. People bitched and bitched about the FaceBook within FaceBook on the right side, now people are okay with it. I'm still getting used to the Timeline feature as I think it messes with the ease of finding information about a person....but eventually I think it will have its niche, thats why its not being forced on people.
Google+ is attempting to take people...but its frankly the geeks that go there "to be different" and when all their non-geek friends don't go over...yah, they just give up and say yah, Circles are cool but Facebook groups do the same thing and all my friends/family already use it. You know your service needs help when you advertise on TV for it.
Am I saying Facebook will be a good investment? Heck no. I'm simply saying it will survive and why comparing it to AOL and MySpace is wrong.
IMO only Apple has the image that could steal enough Facebook users....but they don't want to take that task on.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Doubt it. Facebook has absolutely nothing in common with myspace other than the fact that they both allow you to add "friends." Facebook is a platform. Myspace wasn't. Myspace was also never even a tenth as dominant as Facebook has become, not even at the height of its popularity.TJAJ9 wrote:Facebook will be the next Myspace in a couple of years. Maybe even the next AOL. Both of them are now insignificant after being at the top.
In the age of the internet, something else ALWAYS comes along, and people flock from one service to another.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
I have no idea how they even make money. Iv'e never thought twice about the crappy ads on FB. Who actually does?
- Noobvestor
- Posts: 5944
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:09 am
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Simple counterpoint example: Digg gave users very little control of the site, and they have increasingly become irrelevant. Reddit allowed users to create and manage their own sections of the site (SubReddits) right down to the code/CSS level, and are flourishing.MySpace's failure was in allowing people to have extreme customization of their personal page.
"In the absence of clarity, diversification is the only logical strategy" -= Larry Swedroe
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
TJAJ9 wrote:Facebook will be the next Myspace in a couple of years. Maybe even the next AOL. Both of them are now insignificant after being at the top.
In the age of the internet, something else ALWAYS comes along, and people flock from one service to another.
You're missing something really important. Myspace and AOL only ever connected a small percentage of the population. Facebook has almost total penetration. Really not comparable situations at all. Eventually one company was going to achieve total penetration in social networking and it will be virtually impossible to unseat them now.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Tens of millions of people do. Facebook right now is severely undermonetized. They could probably triple revenue without even growing the user base at this point.cheapedy wrote:I have no idea how they even make money. Iv'e never thought twice about the crappy ads on FB. Who actually does?
- market timer
- Posts: 6535
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 1:42 am
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
I think they should move to a subscription-based service that charges anyone over the age of 25 some monthly fee not to disclose all their college and HS pictures, messages, and postings publicly. Ideally, it would be based on income, like a 1% Facebook tax.KyleAAA wrote:Tens of millions of people do. Facebook right now is severely undermonetized. They could probably triple revenue without even growing the user base at this point.cheapedy wrote:I have no idea how they even make money. Iv'e never thought twice about the crappy ads on FB. Who actually does?
- Epsilon Delta
- Posts: 8090
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:00 pm
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Perhaps in the future. Right now FB has very little HS info about people over 25.market timer wrote: I think they should move to a subscription-based service that charges anyone over the age of 25 some monthly fee not to disclose all their college and HS pictures, messages, and postings publicly. Ideally, it would be based on income, like a 1% Facebook tax.
- market timer
- Posts: 6535
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 1:42 am
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
And yet I'm over 30, not even on FB, and some of my HS pictures found their way onto FB.Epsilon Delta wrote:Perhaps in the future. Right now FB has very little HS info about people over 25.market timer wrote: I think they should move to a subscription-based service that charges anyone over the age of 25 some monthly fee not to disclose all their college and HS pictures, messages, and postings publicly. Ideally, it would be based on income, like a 1% Facebook tax.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Jason Zweig discusses the Facebook IPO and the St. Petersburg Paradox in his latest WSJ column:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... inance_PF4
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... inance_PF4
Best wishes, |
Michael |
|
Invest your time actively and your money passively.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Obviously the business paying the for the ad.cheapedy wrote:I have no idea how they even make money. Iv'e never thought twice about the crappy ads on FB. Who actually does?
- nisiprius
- Advisory Board
- Posts: 52105
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:33 am
- Location: The terrestrial, globular, planetary hunk of matter, flattened at the poles, is my abode.--O. Henry
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
One observation about Facebook (which I dislike and don't "get.") I've been helping with the contact list for my high school's upcoming fiftieth reunion, trying to find people whose contact information is missing or out of date, and I've been astonished a) at how many we've found via Facebook, and b) what the nature of their Facebook pages are like. There are dozens of alums who set up Facebook pages and obviously abandoned them and never did a thing with them. Almost no updates, almost no postings, maybe their picture, maybe a mention of the high school and college they attended, maybe a hint of what city they live in, and that's practically it. They don't answer messages left for them, they are obviously no longer checking the page. But it's there. And these are people who don't have any other Web presence to speak of; a regular Google search doesn't find them, and the phone directories won't find them unless you've at least know what state they're living in.Imperabo wrote:You're missing something really important. Myspace and AOL only ever connected a small percentage of the population. Facebook has almost total penetration.
What's impressive to me is how many geezers and geezettes actually did set up Facebook pages.
Yes, "almost total penetration."
Last edited by nisiprius on Sat Feb 04, 2012 11:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.
-
- Posts: 987
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:11 pm
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Facebook noticed the growth curve was doing this.... http://www.google.com/trends/?q=faceboo ... all&sort=0 and decided to get some cash while the getting was good. I think general stock market performance and levels plays a big part in timing. Still think there's lots of growth and money to squeeze out of this thing.
Once the IPO completes, there will be a lot of employees with lots of cash - I'm sure they all think they have the idea that will be the next "facebook".
As a previous poster mentioned see the difference in google trends between digg and reddit
http://www.google.com/trends/?q=reddit,digg
Once the IPO completes, there will be a lot of employees with lots of cash - I'm sure they all think they have the idea that will be the next "facebook".
As a previous poster mentioned see the difference in google trends between digg and reddit
http://www.google.com/trends/?q=reddit,digg
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Side effect: don't bet on house prices falling on the Peninsula. Palo Alto will remain expensive.HoosierJim wrote: Once the IPO completes, there will be a lot of employees with lots of cash
Apple Inc. has 1 Infinite Loop; Genentech Inc. has 1 DNA Way. But Facebook Inc. now lays claim to Silicon Valley's premier vanity address: 1 Hacker Way.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
I'd guess FB will continue to grow and be very successful. There are a lot of people who communicate their lives through FB and many more opportunities to monetize.
OTOH, buying in an extremely popular and highly publicized IPO doesn't seem the best course. A great business does not necessarily translate into great stock performance, especially if the price already reflects the hype over the business.
OTOH, buying in an extremely popular and highly publicized IPO doesn't seem the best course. A great business does not necessarily translate into great stock performance, especially if the price already reflects the hype over the business.
- 3CT_Paddler
- Posts: 3485
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 4:28 pm
- Location: Marietta, GA
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
FredPeterson wrote: MySpace's failure was in allowing people to have extreme customization of their personal page.
I think MySpace's failures were a lot deeper than just their technical approach. For one thing, Facebook created a much more exclusive environment off the bat for only opening it to college students. It was only after they saturated the college market that they moved on to everyone else. Also MySpace had a deserved reputation for being much more seedy with a significant number of people advertising as if they were a call girl on the street corner.
- 3CT_Paddler
- Posts: 3485
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 4:28 pm
- Location: Marietta, GA
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Maybe there are creative, but painless strategies for monetizing these users, but I would guess the prospects are limited (otherwise they would have done it already). I would think users would have a low tolerance for putting up with lots of intrusive methods, and would consider switching to an alternative. Facebook was created in a matter of weeks. And while I doubt Facebook will be unseated anytime soon, it wouldn't take long for someone to create a much less monetized competing version if they ever really alienate a significant portion of their base.KyleAAA wrote:Tens of millions of people do. Facebook right now is severely undermonetized. They could probably triple revenue without even growing the user base at this point.cheapedy wrote:I have no idea how they even make money. Iv'e never thought twice about the crappy ads on FB. Who actually does?
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
mlebuf wrote:Jason Zweig discusses the Facebook IPO and the St. Petersburg Paradox in his latest WSJ column:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... inance_PF4
At the end of 2010, 608 million people actively used Facebook every month; by this past Dec. 31, 845 million people did. If Facebook keeps growing that fast, more than 22 billion people will be using it 10 years from now, or three times the estimated population of the planet today.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Maybe it's the only way they have to see pictures of their grandkids -- and (quite reasonably) don't see what the rest of the fuss is about and don't bother with it.nisiprius wrote:What's impressive to me is how many geezers and geezettes actually did set up Facebook pages.
- market timer
- Posts: 6535
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 1:42 am
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Based on it being your 50-year reunion, your cohort is 67/68 years old. Their mortality rate is 1.5%/year. In other words, someone who set up a FB page 3 years ago, unconditionally has about a 96% chance of being alive today. That may explain some of the non-responses.nisiprius wrote:One observations about Facebook, which I dislike and don't "get." I've been helping with the contact list for my high school's upcoming fiftieth reunion, trying to find people whose contact information is missing or out of date, and I've been astonished a) at how many we've found via Facebook, and b) what the nature of their Facebook pages are like. There are dozens of alums who set up Facebook pages and obviously abandoned them and never did a thing with them. Almost no updates, almost no postings, maybe their picture, maybe a mention of the high school and college they attended, maybe a hint of what city they live in, and that's practically it. They don't answer messages left for them, they are obviously no longer checking the page. But it's there. And these are people who don't have any other Web presence to speak of; a regular Google search doesn't find them, and the phone directories won't find them unless you've at least know what state they're living in.
What's impressive to me is how many geezers and geezettes actually did set up Facebook pages.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Only one reason for FB here, kids and sports. Its about the only way to get practice updates, game changes etc.
If it was not for that I would kick it to the curb.
Will the stock go up? No clue, I would have thought Google would have not done so well from there IPO, shows what I know, they are up somthing like 450% in what 12 years.
If it was not for that I would kick it to the curb.
Will the stock go up? No clue, I would have thought Google would have not done so well from there IPO, shows what I know, they are up somthing like 450% in what 12 years.
"Out of clutter, find simplicity” Albert Einstein
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
The IPO will be a disaster because your Facebook page is messed up? What does that even mean?
- market timer
- Posts: 6535
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 1:42 am
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Timelineog15F1 wrote:The IPO will be a disaster because your Facebook page is messed up? What does that even mean?
- gotherelate
- Posts: 845
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 6:57 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Tell that to the folks who got in on the Google IPO. Of course, that was a bit different, being a Dutch Auction.richard wrote:OTOH, buying in an extremely popular and highly publicized IPO doesn't seem the best course.
-Grandpa |
I'd rather see where I'm going than see where I've been.
- nisiprius
- Advisory Board
- Posts: 52105
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:33 am
- Location: The terrestrial, globular, planetary hunk of matter, flattened at the poles, is my abode.--O. Henry
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Your statistics sound about right, and I hear about a couple of deceased classmates every year. There must be some sad unintended ghost pages, but so, far, all of the people I "found" through Facebook pages were alive. Of course, if people are deceased, provided their name isn't too common, simply Googling on their name tends to find their obituary if nothing else, and I tend to do that first, so I'm talking for the most part about "people I searched for on Facebook after failing to find them at obituary.com."market timer wrote:Based on it being your 50-year reunion, your cohort is 67/68 years old. Their mortality rate is 1.5%/year. In other words, someone who set up a FB page 3 years ago, unconditionally has about a 96% chance of being alive today. That may explain some of the non-responses.
(My college alumni magazine is depressing these days. My class keeps getting closer and closer to the front of the "class notes" section, and more often leads off with "We are saddened to report that...").
Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Just wondered if anyone ever asked Facebook for the answers and proof of how many of those users came back.
I registered again each time a web place tells me I have to access through Facebook, which has been going on for more than five years, when I was not even trying to access Facebook but another website. I am one person. I probably have 20 Facebook individual registrations.
Just saying it might not be what it seems to be.
I registered again each time a web place tells me I have to access through Facebook, which has been going on for more than five years, when I was not even trying to access Facebook but another website. I am one person. I probably have 20 Facebook individual registrations.
Just saying it might not be what it seems to be.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
ilovedogs wrote:Just wondered if anyone ever asked Facebook for the answers and proof of how many of those users came back.
Yeah, that's in the filings
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
.....
Last edited by ladders11 on Sat Jan 21, 2023 2:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Oh, sweet, the logistic curve in the wild.HoosierJim wrote:Facebook noticed the growth curve was doing this.... http://www.google.com/trends/?q=faceboo ... all&sort=0 and decided to get some cash while the getting was good.
Here's a prediction you can count on: whenever you see something, anything, increasing exponentially, expect it to flex and become a logistic instead. After that it may stay steady or drop off again. Singularities almost never happen, and when they do happen (e.g. black holes), all bets are off.
- market timer
- Posts: 6535
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 1:42 am
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
FNK wrote:Oh, sweet, the logistic curve in the wild.HoosierJim wrote:Facebook noticed the growth curve was doing this.... http://www.google.com/trends/?q=faceboo ... all&sort=0 and decided to get some cash while the getting was good.
Here's a prediction you can count on: whenever you see something, anything, increasing exponentially, expect it to flex and become a logistic instead. After that it may stay steady or drop off again. Singularities almost never happen, and when they do happen (e.g. black holes), all bets are off.
I actually expect this one will reach a singularity someday, perhaps not in my lifetime.
While this one is the biggest bubble on earth.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Plenty of space left before this one pops, luckily food becomes ever cheaper.market timer wrote:
While this one is the biggest bubble on earth.
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 10:12 pm
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
I'm glad I didn't try to short the world's population in 700 BC.
- SimpleGift
- Posts: 4477
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:45 pm
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Since we're already on a giant "off topic" detour here (apologies to the OP):FNK wrote:Here's a prediction you can count on: whenever you see something, anything, increasing exponentially, expect it to flex and become a logistic instead. After that it may stay steady or drop off again.
Your prediction is already coming true for the world's population. The rate of increment of global population growth is already starting to decline and the curve is beginning to flex and level off, just as you describe. Don't see why this shouldn't apply to Facebook's growth trend also, if it hasn't happened already.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
ladders11 wrote: They know that their "active users" stat is exaggerated just like "hits" on a webpage. . . .
There are lots of users who have their account because they needed to do something one time.
I must live in a strange little pocket of the universe then, because probably 90% of the people I know are reasonably active Facebook users. That counts both young and (somewhat) old. Of course, this might partly be because I only still know many of them because they use Facebook.
I do agree with the notion that monetizing Facebook enough to justify $100 billion market cap will kill it though, and that's why I wouldn't invest in it.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
I don't doubt that some people are very involved with it. But the active user stat is "exaggerated" in two ways: first, it is an artificially high number that does not reflect what it purports to; and second, it is regarded as more important than it is. What is important is how many people see the ads and engage with a product or service that is being sold. It matters what real value is provided by what facebook is selling. I don't see this our there.Imperabo wrote:ladders11 wrote: They know that their "active users" stat is exaggerated just like "hits" on a webpage. . . .
There are lots of users who have their account because they needed to do something one time.
I must live in a strange little pocket of the universe then, because probably 90% of the people I know are reasonably active Facebook users. That counts both young and (somewhat) old. Of course, this might partly be because I only still know many of them because they use Facebook.
I do agree with the notion that monetizing Facebook enough to justify $100 billion market cap will kill it though, and that's why I wouldn't invest in it.
It was good strategy, low costs, and a lack of viable competition that allowed facebook's founders to delay their IPO long enough to maximize their own returns. Had they floated this years earlier, much more of the equity gains would have been socialized. I suspect they're slow-rolling.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
The fact is that a new time waster will come along eventually and people will someday flock to that instead. I do wish the marketing departments of other companies would stop latching themselves onto Facebook. I do not like having to visit Facebook to read about new products and company information. I do not want to "like" you to read this information.
It does feel like Facebook is a new AOL which has its own sort of proprietary content that you can't get anywhere else. Unlike AOL in the 1990s, people and companies are now deliberately allowing Facebook to create this situation, even when a perfectly viable and flexible alternative (i.e. normal corporate websites) already exists.
It does feel like Facebook is a new AOL which has its own sort of proprietary content that you can't get anywhere else. Unlike AOL in the 1990s, people and companies are now deliberately allowing Facebook to create this situation, even when a perfectly viable and flexible alternative (i.e. normal corporate websites) already exists.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Agreed.ladders11 wrote:They know that they can't "cross the line" with the sale of user's data, or too much advertising, or user fees. If they do, the users walk, and/or a competitor gains traction. The problem is that for the company to really be worth what it is valued at, they would need to cross the line. It is a paradox, and the only way to win is to cash out.
Someone mentioned Digg earlier. One of the main reasons people migrated to Reddit was Digg's sudden inclusion of ads/paid placements of links in the users' streams. A site's value to a user is based on a signal/noise ratio. At some unknown point, the ratio tips too far and users leave en masse.
Now that FB won't be privately controlled, what are they going to do to extract $125/user worth of value out of the service. Sidebar ads only get you so far, eventually FB will need to start allowing advertisers to select very specific targets (gender, location, interests, religion, etc.) to insert relevant ads in the main feed. When you visit FB and your feed is 80% ads and 20% inane updates from the usual people (e.g. just got back from my jog/shower), who will stick around?
I deleted my account almost a year ago, and I don't miss it. I consider FB to be one of the least trustworthy companies out there.
- sometimesinvestor
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 6:54 am
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
Since to my surprise nobody else has said it I will. I predict Facebook will not be the biggest disaster in ipo history assuming the definition is the largest amount of money lost by first day purchasers.I even think a purchase at the first day high will provide a positive return within 5 years.I know I certainly won't buy for at least 2 w eeks.But, It won't go bankkrupt within the year and thus won't be as bad for purchasers as ome of the internet ipos of 1999/2000 or some of the chinese ipos that have happend in the last two years
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
For what it's worth, most of the people I know who do serious advertising on facebook regard it to be one of the best-value places to direct their advertising dollars. They qualify that by saying you really have to know how to do it right. The value is definitely there for advertisers, though.ladders11 wrote: What is important is how many people see the ads and engage with a product or service that is being sold. It matters what real value is provided by what facebook is selling. I don't see this our there.
Re: Facebook IPO will be the biggest disaster in IPO history
I didn't realize that 12% of their revenue comes from one source.
I always wanted to be a procrastinator.