The return adjusted for inflation's the one that matters. Which illustrates the same issue. Investing into one country can result in a prolonged loss without recovery. Hence my investment into international is a form of insurance against such event.
Does "international" offer any diversification?
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
I'm not arguing for or against adjusting for inflation (though I agree that real returns are what matter).
But with eight different ways to report the returns ($US vs Yen, dividends re-invested or just the index return, nominal or real) here I am quite certain that we'll waste a lot less time talking past each other if each of us specifies which of the eight returns we mean. It is bad enough discussing domestic returns and mixing up nominal and real. Add in the other two and ...
- abuss368
- Posts: 27850
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 2:33 pm
- Location: Where the water is warm, the drinks are cold, and I don't know the names of the players!
- Contact:
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
The Warren Buffett Two Fund Portfolio of S&P 500 and Treasuries / Cash is hard to beat.sf_tech_saver wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 12:30 am
Warren Buffet wisely says all of this back and forth about VTI and VT is all just wasted energy and unless you are a pro to just buy VOO. He's probably right....
Hope you are well.
Tony
John C. Bogle: “Simplicity is the master key to financial success."
- abuss368
- Posts: 27850
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 2:33 pm
- Location: Where the water is warm, the drinks are cold, and I don't know the names of the players!
- Contact:
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Will 2022 bring a different result for international? No one knows for sure. Maximum diversification at the lowest cost is an excellent strategy for the long term
Tony
Tony
John C. Bogle: “Simplicity is the master key to financial success."
-
- Posts: 6234
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:28 am
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Have you changed your mind on international and got back in?
20% VOO | 20% VXUS | 20% AVUV | 20% AVDV | 20% AVES
- Sandtrap
- Posts: 19590
- Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 5:32 pm
- Location: Hawaii No Ka Oi - white sandy beaches, N. Arizona 1 mile high.
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
+1abuss368 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 9:11 pmThe Warren Buffett Two Fund Portfolio of S&P 500 and Treasuries / Cash is hard to beat.sf_tech_saver wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 12:30 am
Warren Buffet wisely says all of this back and forth about VTI and VT is all just wasted energy and unless you are a pro to just buy VOO. He's probably right....
Hope you are well.
Tony
In the interest of simplicity, we brieftly had a percentage of international but dumped it.
For us, there were many reasons, including estate management for future hares. It works for us but not for others. It can't be denied that the Vanguard Target Date Funds and "Fund of Funds" have an ever increasing percentage of International for good reason, or some reason. . . . .
Hybrid 2 fund LMP. with a regretable brief foray into the world of REIT index funds.
j
- abuss368
- Posts: 27850
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 2:33 pm
- Location: Where the water is warm, the drinks are cold, and I don't know the names of the players!
- Contact:
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Thanks Jim. Did not know you exited international.Sandtrap wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 9:02 am+1abuss368 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 9:11 pmThe Warren Buffett Two Fund Portfolio of S&P 500 and Treasuries / Cash is hard to beat.sf_tech_saver wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 12:30 am
Warren Buffet wisely says all of this back and forth about VTI and VT is all just wasted energy and unless you are a pro to just buy VOO. He's probably right....
Hope you are well.
Tony
In the interest of simplicity, we brieftly had a percentage of international but dumped it.
For us, there were many reasons, including estate management for future hares. It works for us but not for others. It can't be denied that the Vanguard Target Date Funds and "Fund of Funds" have an ever increasing percentage of International for good reason, or some reason. . . . .
Hybrid 2 fund LMP. with a regretable brief foray into the world of REIT index funds.
j
Tony
John C. Bogle: “Simplicity is the master key to financial success."
- Sandtrap
- Posts: 19590
- Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 5:32 pm
- Location: Hawaii No Ka Oi - white sandy beaches, N. Arizona 1 mile high.
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
As simple as possible for the hares.abuss368 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:10 pmThanks Jim. Did not know you exited international.Sandtrap wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 9:02 am+1abuss368 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 9:11 pmThe Warren Buffett Two Fund Portfolio of S&P 500 and Treasuries / Cash is hard to beat.sf_tech_saver wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 12:30 am
Warren Buffet wisely says all of this back and forth about VTI and VT is all just wasted energy and unless you are a pro to just buy VOO. He's probably right....
Hope you are well.
Tony
In the interest of simplicity, we brieftly had a percentage of international but dumped it.
For us, there were many reasons, including estate management for future hares. It works for us but not for others. It can't be denied that the Vanguard Target Date Funds and "Fund of Funds" have an ever increasing percentage of International for good reason, or some reason. . . . .
Hybrid 2 fund LMP. with a regretable brief foray into the world of REIT index funds.
j
Tony
J
-
- Posts: 6234
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:28 am
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Your capitulation was the necessary mechanism for exUS to start outperformingSandtrap wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 4:21 pmAs simple as possible for the hares.abuss368 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:10 pmThanks Jim. Did not know you exited international.Sandtrap wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 9:02 am+1abuss368 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 9:11 pmThe Warren Buffett Two Fund Portfolio of S&P 500 and Treasuries / Cash is hard to beat.sf_tech_saver wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 12:30 am
Warren Buffet wisely says all of this back and forth about VTI and VT is all just wasted energy and unless you are a pro to just buy VOO. He's probably right....
Hope you are well.
Tony
In the interest of simplicity, we brieftly had a percentage of international but dumped it.
For us, there were many reasons, including estate management for future hares. It works for us but not for others. It can't be denied that the Vanguard Target Date Funds and "Fund of Funds" have an ever increasing percentage of International for good reason, or some reason. . . . .
Hybrid 2 fund LMP. with a regretable brief foray into the world of REIT index funds.
j
Tony
J
20% VOO | 20% VXUS | 20% AVUV | 20% AVDV | 20% AVES
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Here is an extract from Larry Swedroe on international diversification which might help the OP shape his thoughts on this topic. The full text is here: (https://www.evidenceinvestor.com/invest ... 21-part-1/).
There were only three years of the 21 when the difference in returns between the S&P 500 Index and the MSCI EAFE Index was less than 5 percentage points. On the other hand, there were 14 years when it was at least 8 percentage points. There were also only three years when the return on the S&P 500 Index was within 10 percentage points of the return of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. There were eight years when it was at least 20 percentage points and four when it was at least 30 percentage points. The largest gap was more than 53 percentage points. The data presents powerful evidence that the investment world is far from flat and that there are still significant benefits in international diversification.
“My opinions are just that - opinions.”
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
The last good extended period for international (both large cap and small cap) compared to the SP500 was approximately from 2002 through 2007. But both SCV and MCV did great versus the SP500 from 2001 through 2006. In fact, SCV and MCV beat the pants off internationals. Is this just coincidental that these periods have significant overlap? One possibility is that this followed the dot.com collapse and it's affect on the SP500. Did foreign stocks then look more attractive without such a tech component helping the US blend index?willthrill81 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 10:07 amThat's part of my problem with ex-U.S. stock; it's had 'dry spells' that were very lengthy, and a healthy part of this may be due to currency issues that take a long time to change. We're in a long 'dry spell' right now; ex-U.S. TSM has only returned 1.6% real since 2007. By comparison, SCV has historically offered great diversification as measured by have a significantly lower correlation with U.S. TSM than has ex-U.S. The higher long-term returns and much lower start date sensitivity of SCV have been big 'bonuses' too. Depending on the metrics used, since 1970, the most efficient portfolios for U.S. investors haven't included any ex-U.S. exposure at all. I do find ex-U.S. SCV to be very interesting though and potentially more worthwhile in terms of diversification than ex-U.S. TSM.Forester wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 9:40 amInternational might offer some protection against the US dollar becoming weaker. All things being equal on the currency front, I doubt it matters if you own the ex-US index, as opposed to a US SCV fund.stocksurfer wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:11 pm I'm trying to bring some sanity into my non-US holdings and I'm scratching my head. Most of the funds I look at, whether x-US, developed countries, or EM are dominated by multinationals. E.g. Nestle, LVHM, Taiwan Semiconductor, Samsung, Alibaba, Tencen, and the list goes on. How do these companies offer any diversification from the closely related US multinationals that dominate the US market funds? Don't they sell into the same markets, draw from the same suppliers, are affected by the same global business cycles, etc?
-
- Posts: 6234
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:28 am
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Foreign valuations in 2000 were roughly the same as the US TSM - in other words, overvalued. They ended up doing marginally better than the US.BlueEars wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 7:32 pmThe last good extended period for international (both large cap and small cap) compared to the SP500 was approximately from 2002 through 2007. But both SCV and MCV did great versus the SP500 from 2001 through 2006. In fact, SCV and MCV beat the pants off internationals. Is this just coincidental that these periods have significant overlap? One possibility is that this followed the dot.com collapse and it's affect on the SP500. Did foreign stocks then look more attractive without such a tech component helping the US blend index?willthrill81 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 10:07 amThat's part of my problem with ex-U.S. stock; it's had 'dry spells' that were very lengthy, and a healthy part of this may be due to currency issues that take a long time to change. We're in a long 'dry spell' right now; ex-U.S. TSM has only returned 1.6% real since 2007. By comparison, SCV has historically offered great diversification as measured by have a significantly lower correlation with U.S. TSM than has ex-U.S. The higher long-term returns and much lower start date sensitivity of SCV have been big 'bonuses' too. Depending on the metrics used, since 1970, the most efficient portfolios for U.S. investors haven't included any ex-U.S. exposure at all. I do find ex-U.S. SCV to be very interesting though and potentially more worthwhile in terms of diversification than ex-U.S. TSM.Forester wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 9:40 amInternational might offer some protection against the US dollar becoming weaker. All things being equal on the currency front, I doubt it matters if you own the ex-US index, as opposed to a US SCV fund.stocksurfer wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:11 pm I'm trying to bring some sanity into my non-US holdings and I'm scratching my head. Most of the funds I look at, whether x-US, developed countries, or EM are dominated by multinationals. E.g. Nestle, LVHM, Taiwan Semiconductor, Samsung, Alibaba, Tencen, and the list goes on. How do these companies offer any diversification from the closely related US multinationals that dominate the US market funds? Don't they sell into the same markets, draw from the same suppliers, are affected by the same global business cycles, etc?
I would not compare US TSM today to exUS; the valuation spread is enormous now whereas in 2000 it was largely in lock-step.
20% VOO | 20% VXUS | 20% AVUV | 20% AVDV | 20% AVES
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
The Shiller CAPE uses the SP500 which has a very large component now in tech. Those tech PE's are very high. If you look at SCV for instance, the PE's are down from a decade ago. So just relying on the SP500 to compare to international is kind of overemphasizing tech. Not that I have anything against tech stocks and have a very large part of it in my portfolio. But I am quite willing to go towards value indexes when they show some sustained strength. Also quite willing to go into international after some sustained strength.Nathan Drake wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 8:01 pmForeign valuations in 2000 were roughly the same as the US TSM - in other words, overvalued. They ended up doing marginally better than the US.BlueEars wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 7:32 pmThe last good extended period for international (both large cap and small cap) compared to the SP500 was approximately from 2002 through 2007. But both SCV and MCV did great versus the SP500 from 2001 through 2006. In fact, SCV and MCV beat the pants off internationals. Is this just coincidental that these periods have significant overlap? One possibility is that this followed the dot.com collapse and it's affect on the SP500. Did foreign stocks then look more attractive without such a tech component helping the US blend index?willthrill81 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 10:07 amThat's part of my problem with ex-U.S. stock; it's had 'dry spells' that were very lengthy, and a healthy part of this may be due to currency issues that take a long time to change. We're in a long 'dry spell' right now; ex-U.S. TSM has only returned 1.6% real since 2007. By comparison, SCV has historically offered great diversification as measured by have a significantly lower correlation with U.S. TSM than has ex-U.S. The higher long-term returns and much lower start date sensitivity of SCV have been big 'bonuses' too. Depending on the metrics used, since 1970, the most efficient portfolios for U.S. investors haven't included any ex-U.S. exposure at all. I do find ex-U.S. SCV to be very interesting though and potentially more worthwhile in terms of diversification than ex-U.S. TSM.Forester wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 9:40 amInternational might offer some protection against the US dollar becoming weaker. All things being equal on the currency front, I doubt it matters if you own the ex-US index, as opposed to a US SCV fund.stocksurfer wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:11 pm I'm trying to bring some sanity into my non-US holdings and I'm scratching my head. Most of the funds I look at, whether x-US, developed countries, or EM are dominated by multinationals. E.g. Nestle, LVHM, Taiwan Semiconductor, Samsung, Alibaba, Tencen, and the list goes on. How do these companies offer any diversification from the closely related US multinationals that dominate the US market funds? Don't they sell into the same markets, draw from the same suppliers, are affected by the same global business cycles, etc?
I would not compare US TSM today to exUS; the valuation spread is enormous now whereas in 2000 it was largely in lock-step.
Here are relative PE changes which I periodically get from Vanguard:
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
VT/VTWAX and chill...
Stocks-80% || Bonds-20% || Taxable-VTI/VXUS || IRA-VT/BNDW
-
- Posts: 10433
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 5:57 pm
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2020 2:57 am
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
This is what I settled on as well. I sleep like a baby.
Simplicity is King
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Terrible, borderline misleading example. Care to tell the class what the PE of the Nikkei was at the peak? Let me help: around 100.mrpotatoheadsays wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:28 pmHistory.
Consider the Nikkei; it's been over thirty years and it still hasn't recovered. The US market could do the same thing; the Shiller PE (https://www.multpl.com/shiller-pe) looks ominous.
Nikkei:
When the S&P hits 18,000 with earnings not going up a nickel…. let us all know. Until then this is a hallow comparison.
In short, it’s very, very unlikely you’d see a 20 year run in the “dog house” at the present PEs of the US market. It simply wouldn’t take that long before US equities would be so cheaply priced, they’d get bid up from lows.
-
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:03 pm
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Of course. The fact that that equities across many geographical areas perform differently in varying directions and magnitudes at different times is the very definition of diversification at work.
VTWAX and chill
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
I've read a zillion posts on this topic, and it boils down to the fact that some people are absolutely convinced that a portfolio containing international has a high probability of underperforming a U.S. one in the future -- and other people are convinced of the exact opposite. Each side has logical reasons. Therefore, pick one and go with it. Eventually we will know who was right (depending on when we stop counting.)
-
- Posts: 6234
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:28 am
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
History shows us that one camp is correct and the other position isn’t aligned with the cyclicality of the dataTom_T wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 1:27 pm I've read a zillion posts on this topic, and it boils down to the fact that some people are absolutely convinced that a portfolio containing international has a high probability of underperforming a U.S. one in the future -- and other people are convinced of the exact opposite. Each side has logical reasons. Therefore, pick one and go with it. Eventually we will know who was right (depending on when we stop counting.)
20% VOO | 20% VXUS | 20% AVUV | 20% AVDV | 20% AVES
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
History shows that when one camp is sure they're correct, sometimes they're not.Nathan Drake wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 1:29 pmHistory shows us that one camp is correct and the other position isn’t aligned with the cyclicality of the dataTom_T wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 1:27 pm I've read a zillion posts on this topic, and it boils down to the fact that some people are absolutely convinced that a portfolio containing international has a high probability of underperforming a U.S. one in the future -- and other people are convinced of the exact opposite. Each side has logical reasons. Therefore, pick one and go with it. Eventually we will know who was right (depending on when we stop counting.)
Get most of it right and don't make any big mistakes. All else being equal, simpler is better. Simple is as simple does.
-
- Posts: 10433
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 5:57 pm
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Humans are interesting, emotional creatures, subject to biases and behavioral errors.bogledogle87 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 1:22 pm Of course. The fact that that equities across many geographical areas perform differently in varying directions and magnitudes at different times is the very definition of diversification at work.
It's interesting that many people are willing and able to hold a portfolio of U.S. stocks and not mind at all, and probably don't even know, when certain sectors lag. It's inevitable that if you break up any fund into bunches (sectors, styles, sizes, countries, etc.) that those bunches will not all perform the same. Most will fully accept not bat an eye if technology outperforms financials, industrials outperform energy, utilities outperform communications, and so on. Total market investors feel the same about large vs. small and growth vs. value.
Yet, when you throw countries in there, suddenly it all goes out the window and we have to, for some reason I don't understand, hone in on the performance of the U.S. total market vs. all other markets as a whole.
It's silly. I don't look at U.S. vs. international any more than I look at technology vs. financials, large vs. small, value vs. growth. To me, the total world market is the reasonable and rational equity portfolio and I don't mentally break it up into arbitrary components.
-
- Posts: 6234
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:28 am
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
It’s like arguing 1 + 1 isn’t 2.GaryA505 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 1:54 pmHistory shows that when one camp is sure they're correct, sometimes they're not.Nathan Drake wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 1:29 pmHistory shows us that one camp is correct and the other position isn’t aligned with the cyclicality of the dataTom_T wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 1:27 pm I've read a zillion posts on this topic, and it boils down to the fact that some people are absolutely convinced that a portfolio containing international has a high probability of underperforming a U.S. one in the future -- and other people are convinced of the exact opposite. Each side has logical reasons. Therefore, pick one and go with it. Eventually we will know who was right (depending on when we stop counting.)
Markets cycle. US outperforms. ExUS outperforms.
It’s not a static constantly outperforming state of affairs, sorry. But some genuinely believe that
20% VOO | 20% VXUS | 20% AVUV | 20% AVDV | 20% AVES
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
But nobody knows which one will perform more often, or even if they will both outperform anywhere close to the same amount over time. The US and ex-US markets haven't "cycled" equally in the past. Should we expect that to change?Nathan Drake wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 2:20 pmIt’s like arguing 1 + 1 isn’t 2.GaryA505 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 1:54 pmHistory shows that when one camp is sure they're correct, sometimes they're not.Nathan Drake wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 1:29 pmHistory shows us that one camp is correct and the other position isn’t aligned with the cyclicality of the dataTom_T wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 1:27 pm I've read a zillion posts on this topic, and it boils down to the fact that some people are absolutely convinced that a portfolio containing international has a high probability of underperforming a U.S. one in the future -- and other people are convinced of the exact opposite. Each side has logical reasons. Therefore, pick one and go with it. Eventually we will know who was right (depending on when we stop counting.)
Markets cycle. US outperforms. ExUS outperforms.
It’s not a static constantly outperforming state of affairs, sorry. But some genuinely believe that
I wish it was as simple as 1 + 1.
Get most of it right and don't make any big mistakes. All else being equal, simpler is better. Simple is as simple does.
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
My preference is to be more diversified, and if that means I might get a lower return, then I can live with it because it will be good enough. And maybe I'll do better. If you get 12% and I get 7%, I won't run out of money.
-
- Posts: 6234
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:28 am
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
And that’s a great argument for owning internationalGaryA505 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 2:28 pmBut nobody knows which one will perform more often, or even if they will both outperform anywhere close to the same amount over time. The US and ex-US markets haven't "cycled" equally in the past. Should we expect that to change?Nathan Drake wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 2:20 pmIt’s like arguing 1 + 1 isn’t 2.GaryA505 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 1:54 pmHistory shows that when one camp is sure they're correct, sometimes they're not.Nathan Drake wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 1:29 pmHistory shows us that one camp is correct and the other position isn’t aligned with the cyclicality of the dataTom_T wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 1:27 pm I've read a zillion posts on this topic, and it boils down to the fact that some people are absolutely convinced that a portfolio containing international has a high probability of underperforming a U.S. one in the future -- and other people are convinced of the exact opposite. Each side has logical reasons. Therefore, pick one and go with it. Eventually we will know who was right (depending on when we stop counting.)
Markets cycle. US outperforms. ExUS outperforms.
It’s not a static constantly outperforming state of affairs, sorry. But some genuinely believe that
I wish it was as simple as 1 + 1.
Even if you think US will outperform over the very long term, it has to fit in nicely with your particular investment sequence for that sort of bet to pay off.
20% VOO | 20% VXUS | 20% AVUV | 20% AVDV | 20% AVES
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
And then there's this, which would suggest that the 80/20 US/ex-US allocation seen often here is reasonable and prudent, given a long retirement horizon:
https://ibb.co/q15Y6h9
https://ibb.co/q15Y6h9
Get most of it right and don't make any big mistakes. All else being equal, simpler is better. Simple is as simple does.
-
- Posts: 6234
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:28 am
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Yes, if the future is exactly like it was from 1970-2021GaryA505 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 3:26 pm And then there's this, which would suggest that the 80/20 US/ex-US allocation seen often here is reasonable and prudent, given a long retirement horizon:
https://ibb.co/q15Y6h9
20% VOO | 20% VXUS | 20% AVUV | 20% AVDV | 20% AVES
-
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:44 am
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Allocate by Marketcap and call it a day.stocksurfer wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:11 pm I'm trying to bring some sanity into my non-US holdings and I'm scratching my head. Most of the funds I look at, whether x-US, developed countries, or EM are dominated by multinationals. E.g. Nestle, LVHM, Taiwan Semiconductor, Samsung, Alibaba, Tencen, and the list goes on. How do these companies offer any diversification from the closely related US multinationals that dominate the US market funds? Don't they sell into the same markets, draw from the same suppliers, are affected by the same global business cycles, etc?
I looked a few charts on portfolio visualizer. For example, VEA has 0.9 correlation with the US Market. EEM goes down to 0.8. So yes, slightly different sector weights, slightly different local factors, and currency effects, but overall everything pretty much marches in lock-step as far as I can see. Am I just not looking right?
I guess I was somehow hoping that some countries would have business cycles that are decoupled from the US and that I could buy into that, but I suppose this is the 21st century and I'm antiquated?
Two funds that seemed interesting are DGS and EWX (both EM small cap): looking at the top holdings shows very few companies I recognize, the top holding accounts for just around 1% of the fund. However.... both have ~30% invested in Taiwan and the top 3 countries account for 50-60% of holdings. (And I won't mention ER.) VSS (x-US small cap) does a better job at diversifying across countries IMHO, but according to PV it showed 0.86 US market correlation over the past decade.
Am I missing something?
US - 60 and xUS - 40.
If it changes so be it,
In 2010 it was the reverse.
36% (IRA) - Individual LT Corporate Bonds , 33%(taxable) - schy, 33%(taxable) - SCHD Dividend Growth
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Does owning Delta and UAL stock offer any diversification, compared to owning only one of the two alone ? Both are domestic commercial airlines, so I'd say no diversification, right ?Does "international" offer any diversification?
Does adding Virgin Atlantic stock to the mix add diversification ? They are a UK commercial airline, but a substantial part of their business is flights to/from the US and Delta actually owns 49% of the common stocks. That means VS stocks does not add any diversification, surely.
The above conclusions, patently wrong, are based on the very same considerations made in this thread about adding international stocks to one's domestic portfolio.
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2021 7:40 pm
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
I can't decide which is hated more on BH, ex-US or dividend stocks. Or maybe gold.
FWIW, I am 42% ex-US as of this morning. Ignoring my miners which I put in the gold bin.
FWIW, I am 42% ex-US as of this morning. Ignoring my miners which I put in the gold bin.
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Certainly gold is held in greater disdain here than ex-U.S. stock, despite that it's been a better diversifying asset over the last 50 years, though it certainly might fail in that regard over the next 50. YMMV.SeasOfCheese wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 4:04 pm I can't decide which is hated more on BH, ex-US or dividend stocks. Or maybe gold.
FWIW, I am 42% ex-US as of this morning. Ignoring my miners which I put in the gold bin.
The Sensible Steward
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Gold was so 2021. We are now on 2022 where we as a community have modified these time tested quotes to align to current trends:SeasOfCheese wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 4:04 pm I can't decide which is hated more on BH, ex-US or dividend stocks. Or maybe gold.
FWIW, I am 42% ex-US as of this morning. Ignoring my miners which I put in the gold bin.
“Don’t look for the needle in the haystack. Just buy the haystack US stocks.”
"Owning the whole stock US market over the long term is a winner's game, but attempting to beat the market is a loser's game"
"Nobody knows nothing Everyone knows US out-performance will continue"
-
- Posts: 6234
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:28 am
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Gold may be useful for withdrawals in a small amount as a diversified, but it’s record as a long term grower is worthy of scrutinywillthrill81 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 9:21 pmCertainly gold is held in greater disdain here than ex-U.S. stock, despite that it's been a better diversifying asset over the last 50 years, though it certainly might fail in that regard over the next 50. YMMV.SeasOfCheese wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 4:04 pm I can't decide which is hated more on BH, ex-US or dividend stocks. Or maybe gold.
FWIW, I am 42% ex-US as of this morning. Ignoring my miners which I put in the gold bin.
I don’t see a any reason to own it in accumulation
20% VOO | 20% VXUS | 20% AVUV | 20% AVDV | 20% AVES
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
I don't want to derail this thread, so I'll just refer to the recent 'efficient portfolios' thread regarding Tyler9000's recent post on Portfolio Charts.Nathan Drake wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 1:35 amGold may be useful for withdrawals in a small amount as a diversified, but it’s record as a long term grower is worthy of scrutinywillthrill81 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 9:21 pmCertainly gold is held in greater disdain here than ex-U.S. stock, despite that it's been a better diversifying asset over the last 50 years, though it certainly might fail in that regard over the next 50. YMMV.SeasOfCheese wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 4:04 pm I can't decide which is hated more on BH, ex-US or dividend stocks. Or maybe gold.
FWIW, I am 42% ex-US as of this morning. Ignoring my miners which I put in the gold bin.
I don’t see a any reason to own it in accumulation
The Sensible Steward
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
When we hit Nikkei valuations I'm cashing out completely and to heck with naysayers about timing and how it's all about time in the market.willthrill81 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:39 pmWhile I agree that the U.S. stock market's valuations certainly seem to portend below average future returns, they are only about half what the Nikkei's reached before it started its 30+ year slump.mrpotatoheadsays wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:28 pmHistory.
Consider the Nikkei; it's been over thirty years and it still hasn't recovered. The US market could do the same thing; the Shiller PE (https://www.multpl.com/shiller-pe) looks ominous.
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
I agree and have said the same. No way in heck I'm paying anything close to 90x for earnings.nigel_ht wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 9:59 amWhen we hit Nikkei valuations I'm cashing out completely and to heck with naysayers about timing and how it's all about time in the market.willthrill81 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:39 pmWhile I agree that the U.S. stock market's valuations certainly seem to portend below average future returns, they are only about half what the Nikkei's reached before it started its 30+ year slump.mrpotatoheadsays wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:28 pmHistory.
Consider the Nikkei; it's been over thirty years and it still hasn't recovered. The US market could do the same thing; the Shiller PE (https://www.multpl.com/shiller-pe) looks ominous.
The Sensible Steward
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 7:35 am
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
That's a good argument against total market indexing, with Tesla at a PE of 338.23.willthrill81 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:03 am
I agree and have said the same. No way in heck I'm paying anything close to 90x for earnings.
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Not necessarily. TSM being tilted toward a few highly valued companies does not mean that TSM is bad.fixi reinhart wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:05 amThat's a good argument against total market indexing, with Tesla at a PE of 338.23.willthrill81 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:03 am
I agree and have said the same. No way in heck I'm paying anything close to 90x for earnings.
I've thought for years that Amazon was overvalued and I still do, but I cannot deny that it's returned 30% annualized nominal over the last 3 years.
But if valuations for TSM as a whole get anywhere close to double their current levels (i.e., where Japan got to), that's far too bubbly for me.
The Sensible Steward
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 7:35 am
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
If we ever get to that point there will be a really good story supporting these valuations. (and in a low interest rate environment they might not be wrong )willthrill81 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:09 am
Not necessarily. TSM being tilted toward a few highly valued companies does not mean that TSM is bad.
I've thought for years that Amazon was overvalued and I still do, but I cannot deny that it's returned 30% annualized nominal over the last 3 years.
But if valuations for TSM as a whole get anywhere close to double their current levels (i.e., where Japan got to), that's far too bubbly for me.
- vanbogle59
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2021 7:30 pm
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
....the other half of my 50/50 portfolio will be so large my boat will have a boat.
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
There was a good story supporting the U.S.'s valuations in the late 1990s (e.g., 'it's different this time'), but the story was only that and not reality.fixi reinhart wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:13 amIf we ever get to that point there will be a really good story supporting these valuations. (and in a low interest rate environment they might not be wrong )willthrill81 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:09 am
Not necessarily. TSM being tilted toward a few highly valued companies does not mean that TSM is bad.
I've thought for years that Amazon was overvalued and I still do, but I cannot deny that it's returned 30% annualized nominal over the last 3 years.
But if valuations for TSM as a whole get anywhere close to double their current levels (i.e., where Japan got to), that's far too bubbly for me.
Considering where interest rates are now, they would seemingly have to go quite negative to logically support a CAPE of 90.
The Sensible Steward
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
We once saw Paul Allen's super yacht, the Octopus, in person, and his boat had its own marina with a retractable door, two submarines, and a helipad. Maybe you could do the same!vanbogle59 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:15 am....the other half of my 50/50 portfolio will be so large my boat will have a boat.
The Sensible Steward
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 7:35 am
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
They don't have to go negative.willthrill81 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:20 am
There was a good story supporting the U.S.'s valuations in the late 1990s (e.g., 'it's different this time'), but the story was only that and not reality.
Considering where interest rates are now, they would seemingly have to go quite negative to logically support a CAPE of 90.
Lowering the discount rate close to zero (which it currently is) makes very high PEs for stocks "rational".
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Yeah. Same here. 30% of my portfolio is VTI. If VTI continues to soar (who knows?), well, the excess will be harvested and rebalanced to ex-US and to bonds.vanbogle59 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:15 am....the other half of my 50/50 portfolio will be so large my boat will have a boat.
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
Actually, they have cycled equally (more or less) in the past. From 1961 to 2021, US stocks outperformed ex-US stocks in 31 of the 61 calendar years. That's as close to 50% of the time as you can get.
The recent streak of US outperformance is highly unusual compared to prior periods, in fact. From 1961 through 2012, US stocks outperformed in only 44% of the calendar year periods which makes the 2013 to 2021 run look somewhat anomalous.
What the future holds is unknowable, but it is worth observing that streaks of US outperformance have occurred before only to see the tables turn at some point. From 1989 to 2001, for example, the US outperformed in 10 of those 13 years but then underperformed in the next six consecutive years (and 8 out of the next 11 years).
"Far more money has been lost by investors preparing for corrections than has been lost in corrections themselves." ~~ Peter Lynch
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
All international did was drag my returns for 10 years. I've decided to just ride or die with the US market. Many US companies have exposure across the globe in my opinion.
40% Extended Market | 40% S&P 500 | 10% REIT | 5% State Muni Bond | 5% Cash
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 7:35 am
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
As long as there isn't a major geopolitical event impacting the long-term prospects of the US negatively, it will likely work out fine.
-
- Posts: 492
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2021 3:37 pm
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
These are good points not lost on me as a US only investor. However, instead of changing lanes only to wish I was in the other lane is not appealing to me and I will stay the course knowing international will at some point outperform US. I choose simplicity. You may choose differently.vineviz wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:44 amActually, they have cycled equally (more or less) in the past. From 1961 to 2021, US stocks outperformed ex-US stocks in 31 of the 61 calendar years. That's as close to 50% of the time as you can get.
The recent streak of US outperformance is highly unusual compared to prior periods, in fact. From 1961 through 2012, US stocks outperformed in only 44% of the calendar year periods which makes the 2013 to 2021 run look somewhat anomalous.
What the future holds is unknowable, but it is worth observing that streaks of US outperformance have occurred before only to see the tables turn at some point. From 1989 to 2001, for example, the US outperformed in 10 of those 13 years but then underperformed in the next six consecutive years (and 8 out of the next 11 years).
"The greatest enemy of a good plan is the dream of a perfect plan"
Re: Does "international" offer any diversification?
The issue is the magnitude of out-performance, not the number of years.vineviz wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:44 amActually, they have cycled equally (more or less) in the past. From 1961 to 2021, US stocks outperformed ex-US stocks in 31 of the 61 calendar years. That's as close to 50% of the time as you can get.
The recent streak of US outperformance is highly unusual compared to prior periods, in fact. From 1961 through 2012, US stocks outperformed in only 44% of the calendar year periods which makes the 2013 to 2021 run look somewhat anomalous.
What the future holds is unknowable, but it is worth observing that streaks of US outperformance have occurred before only to see the tables turn at some point. From 1989 to 2001, for example, the US outperformed in 10 of those 13 years but then underperformed in the next six consecutive years (and 8 out of the next 11 years).