As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2021 1:34 pm
As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
“As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy”
MarketWatch 12/6/2021
“Vanguard built its reputation on democratizing investing, bringing institutional products to the masses and doing so cheaply. Its retail-investor-friendly moves – index funds and low fees — have endeared it to millions of investors.
But the asset manager’s recent push into private-equity markets is giving some fans pause.
Some advisers think Vanguard’s entry into private equity underscores that the firm is no longer the firm founded by Jack Bogle in 1975.
“I suspect [Bogle] will roll over in his grave” if he was asked about the private-equity foray, said Allan Roth, certified financial planner and founder of Wealth Logic, an investment advisory and financial planning firm in Colorado Springs, Colo.”
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/as-va ... =home-page
MarketWatch 12/6/2021
“Vanguard built its reputation on democratizing investing, bringing institutional products to the masses and doing so cheaply. Its retail-investor-friendly moves – index funds and low fees — have endeared it to millions of investors.
But the asset manager’s recent push into private-equity markets is giving some fans pause.
Some advisers think Vanguard’s entry into private equity underscores that the firm is no longer the firm founded by Jack Bogle in 1975.
“I suspect [Bogle] will roll over in his grave” if he was asked about the private-equity foray, said Allan Roth, certified financial planner and founder of Wealth Logic, an investment advisory and financial planning firm in Colorado Springs, Colo.”
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/as-va ... =home-page
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
Things change and everything will change. Management change is one of a factor that determines how a company will run. Vanguard is a company first and foremost and if the management believe that private equity is one of the asset to generate revenue for the company then so be it. I think boglehead, especially this forum sometimes feels like a dangerous place to be suck into. If you are not with me, you are wrong. Not sorry to be blunt but this comes from someone that is not from US.
inb4 locked
inb4 locked
Last edited by Tinyz on Mon Dec 06, 2021 8:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 9446
- Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2017 7:16 pm
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
I am queasy. My view is completely the opposite of the previous poster.
Last edited by UpperNwGuy on Mon Dec 06, 2021 8:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
I'm feeling seasick.
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
I do not imagine the basic low cost index funds offered by Vanguard are going to go away, meaning I am not queasy about my investing. There is certainly enough competition for assets that low cost funds are here to stay. I don't hold my accounts at Vanguard or consult them for advice.
This could mean that suggesting that new investors seeking advice might try Vanguard PAS could become dubious advice.
This could mean that suggesting that new investors seeking advice might try Vanguard PAS could become dubious advice.
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
Mr. Bogle had lots of disagreements with Vanguard.
Vanguard offering "Private Equity" seems to me like if Walmart selling cigarettes. It's not something anybody needs, but if they do it at lower cost, I guess at least they're doing it cheaper
Vanguard offering "Private Equity" seems to me like if Walmart selling cigarettes. It's not something anybody needs, but if they do it at lower cost, I guess at least they're doing it cheaper
"To achieve satisfactory investment results is easier than most people realize; to achieve superior results is harder than it looks." - Benjamin Graham
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
I’m a DIY investor. I don’t care who their target audience(s) are. I’m going to continue doing DIY, using Vanguard funds.
A dollar in Roth is worth more than a dollar in a taxable account. A dollar in taxable is worth more than a dollar in a tax-deferred account.
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
Vanguard isn’t disclosing the cost to investors. It will be higher than typical expense ratios though and will include a percentage of gains on top of that. Also there will be a lock in period of possibly several years. Admittance will probably be for flagship at a minimum.
So if you want to lock up a million plus for 10 years or more and see what happens, this might be for you!
So if you want to lock up a million plus for 10 years or more and see what happens, this might be for you!
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
Vanguard has been diversifying its services and marketing strategy (to match the competition) for quite some time. A bit late to be queezy.
Last edited by sandan on Mon Dec 06, 2021 9:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2018 9:46 pm
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
I'm happy to let them develop and sell expensive, profitable products to others if it means I can keep buying low-cost, excellently-managed index mutual funds (or if it helps them improve their customer service). I have about the same amount of money invested at Fidelity, and that's how they play ball.
Already impartial now...and you have a nice day.
-
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 9:56 pm
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
Why should anyone care? Are they getting rid of the total stock market fund? No. Are they going to force you to invest in private equity funds? They can't.
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
I don't get what the big deal is: private equity will be an offering, not something anyone is forced to sign up for. Yes, it's a bad look for a place like Vanguard, but that's all it is.
50% VTSAX | 25% VTIAX | 25% VBTLX (retirement), 25% VTEAX (taxable)
-
- Posts: 2839
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 9:58 pm
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
What reward/risk does unregulated private equity offer Vanguard customers that existing access to funds, EFTs, and securities does not already provide to investors? Perhaps we can expect (private) equity index funds?
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
High risk and high reward? That's not my cup of tea, but it may be attractive to others.criticalmass wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 10:42 pm What reward/risk does unregulated private equity offer Vanguard customers that existing access to funds, EFTs, and securities does not already provide to investors? Perhaps we can expect (private) equity index funds?
50% VTSAX | 25% VTIAX | 25% VBTLX (retirement), 25% VTEAX (taxable)
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
My policy is to buy the haystack. There's more to the haystack than stocks. To the extent Vanguard is able to break into other kinds of equity, I'm excited.
-
- Posts: 8620
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 11:31 am
- Location: West coast of Florida, near Champa Bay !
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
Some fans got queasy when ETFs were first offered by Vanguard.
Seems Vanguard has done pretty darn well in ETFs, despite Mr Bogle turning down the opportunity to roll them out.
Me, I don't believe Mr Bogle would have stood pat and allowed his creation to become an also-ran company hawking only mutual funds.
In business you adapt or die.
Broken Man 1999
Seems Vanguard has done pretty darn well in ETFs, despite Mr Bogle turning down the opportunity to roll them out.
Me, I don't believe Mr Bogle would have stood pat and allowed his creation to become an also-ran company hawking only mutual funds.
In business you adapt or die.
Broken Man 1999
“If I cannot drink Bourbon and smoke cigars in Heaven then I shall not go." - Mark Twain
- Rick Ferri
- Posts: 9703
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:40 am
- Location: Georgetown, TX. Twitter: @Rick_Ferri
- Contact:
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
My discussion with Ted Aronson on the matter:
A Candid Discussion with Ted Aronson about Vanguard's Push into Private Equity and Adding Active Funds to PAS Clients
Rick Ferri
A Candid Discussion with Ted Aronson about Vanguard's Push into Private Equity and Adding Active Funds to PAS Clients
Rick Ferri
The Education of an Index Investor: born in darkness, finds indexing enlightenment, overcomplicates everything, embraces simplicity.
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
It can be a reason to be careful about TD funds is that the vendor changes what is in the fund and the investor may not be clear on what is happening. But I don't think that is the case yet.MNSooner wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 10:19 amEspecially if the target date fund is not in a tax-deferred account.
I feel for anyone in that situation. They must either pay taxes to get out, or pay Vanguard their Danegeld.
-
- Posts: 6542
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 1:35 pm
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
One risk that we have in "buying the market" is that we can only buy in the public market.
I am very much not a fan of private equity, but one potential demise of the low cost index fund
approach is if private equity buys up a majority of the companies.
I see Vanguard's move this as a response to that risk. You don't have to invest in those funds, but
they will be available to you (at least to an accredited investor).
Do you have some concerns about Vanguard's viability with this move?
I would like to hear about how this might affect that viability, since it affects my investments,
but I don't see how it would.
If it does diminish the viability, then this is actionable: Move away from Vanguard.
If this is just "Vanguard has strayed from the path" then I do not think that this is actionable.
I am very much not a fan of private equity, but one potential demise of the low cost index fund
approach is if private equity buys up a majority of the companies.
I see Vanguard's move this as a response to that risk. You don't have to invest in those funds, but
they will be available to you (at least to an accredited investor).
Do you have some concerns about Vanguard's viability with this move?
I would like to hear about how this might affect that viability, since it affects my investments,
but I don't see how it would.
If it does diminish the viability, then this is actionable: Move away from Vanguard.
If this is just "Vanguard has strayed from the path" then I do not think that this is actionable.
Last edited by MathWizard on Tue Dec 07, 2021 10:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 8620
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 11:31 am
- Location: West coast of Florida, near Champa Bay !
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
We held Target Retirement funds for some time but changed to individual holdings to save expenses.
Vanguard would have lost me as a customer of Target Retirement funds when they added international bonds, anyway.
I expect Vanguard will do well in their efforts, though I have no interest in the product, myself.
Broken Man 1999
“If I cannot drink Bourbon and smoke cigars in Heaven then I shall not go." - Mark Twain
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
As long as they still have my index funds VTI, VXUS etc I don't really care what else they carry.
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
I read the article as saying that the minimum was $500k and the lock in was 14 years. The percent of assets and profits I read as descriptive of the field on average, not specifically what this particular deal would do.tetractys wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 9:02 pm Vanguard isn’t disclosing the cost to investors. It will be higher than typical expense ratios though and will include a percentage of gains on top of that. Also there will be a lock in period of possibly several years. Admittance will probably be for flagship at a minimum.
So if you want to lock up a million plus for 10 years or more and see what happens, this might be for you!
If I am correct, one should be far better off than required for accredited investor or qualified purchaser before going for it.
I am not at convinced that PE is worth investing in at all. As best I can tell, funds that have initial success raise other funds on that basis but that performance does not persist. That means high fees.and no liquidity without a rational expectation of better risk adjusted returns. There are abundant data saying this, so it would take a lot to convince me otherwise.
For now, I will pass.
Since the federal requirements limit who could participate, I suspect only a small fraction of PAS clients would be eligible. Given the risks, I also suspect that Vanguard will be cautious in recommending PE to people who can easily sleep at night without worrying about the return on a lousy half million dollar investment.
Why offer it at all? I assume customers or their advisers requested it. Vanguard certainly is not marketing it to the wider world.
We don't know how to beat the market on a risk-adjusted basis, and we don't know anyone that does know either |
--Swedroe |
We assume that markets are efficient, that prices are right |
--Fama
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
No. I do not see this as posing any threat to Vanguard's viability. It could be a threat to their reputation if the fund craters spectacularly. Otherwise, the cap weighted, "market is efficient" investors will ignore it completely.
We don't know how to beat the market on a risk-adjusted basis, and we don't know anyone that does know either |
--Swedroe |
We assume that markets are efficient, that prices are right |
--Fama
- sunnywindy
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 3:42 pm
- Location: Central California
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
It is possible this fund could save some institutions like colleges and large non-profits a lot of fees versus investing in other PE funds. So, if your kids or the vulnerable people in your community use the services of non-profit institutions, you could benefit indirectly because Vanguard's PE fund increased the return of the subscribing institution.
Powered by chocolate!
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
I'm less sensitive to other funds, good or bad, that Vanguard carries, but I certainly wouldn't want more bad funds to have to sort out myself and especially if spouse or others have to take over management.
Looks like Evergrande is like Puerto Rico bonds, or maybe worse.Broken Man 1999 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 10:40 amWe held Target Retirement funds for some time but changed to individual holdings to save expenses.
Vanguard would have lost me as a customer of Target Retirement funds when they added international bonds, anyway.
I expect Vanguard will do well in their efforts, though I have no interest in the product, myself.
I prefer Vanguard for the time being, but if they keep adding bad, difficult, confusing and expensive products, they will lose the current advantage they have and just lead to churn.
-
- Posts: 6201
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:28 am
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
Private Equity is just Small Cap Value - 2/20 fees + lockup
No thanks, I’ll just invest in cheap SCV funds instead like AVUV
No thanks, I’ll just invest in cheap SCV funds instead like AVUV
20% VOO | 20% VXUS | 20% AVUV | 20% AVDV | 20% AVES
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
What a sell..."you are too liquid".ok so PE is the answer? Yes. Oh yeah Let the good times roll!
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
No thanks to Vanguard PE. Rick Ferri's discussion with Ted Aronson about this is worth the listen.
Dave
Dave
"Reality always wins, your only job is to get in touch with it." Wilfred Bion
Re: As Vanguard pushes into private equity, some fans get queasy
Well, if I were 20 yrs younger might consider investing. It seems to me to be just another Hedge Fund and I have been sniffing around
What concerns me is that is it a definite move away from the founding principles of Vanguard and certainly Jack Bogle.
He is indeed turning in his grave.
The move is radical and mimics what others are doing - make more money, not serve the public. Vang was founded to be different.
Yes, it is a leak in our ship. We aren't going to sink but taint a good idea to deviate from founding core principles. Bad old fashion greed will permeate all of Vang in a few short years. You'll see.
Or I may be overreacting and wrong to boot!
What concerns me is that is it a definite move away from the founding principles of Vanguard and certainly Jack Bogle.
He is indeed turning in his grave.
The move is radical and mimics what others are doing - make more money, not serve the public. Vang was founded to be different.
Yes, it is a leak in our ship. We aren't going to sink but taint a good idea to deviate from founding core principles. Bad old fashion greed will permeate all of Vang in a few short years. You'll see.
Or I may be overreacting and wrong to boot!