Is S&P 500 Membership for Sale?
- sunnywindy
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 3:42 pm
- Location: Central California
Is S&P 500 Membership for Sale?
I came across this interesting article today:
https://www.fa-mag.com/news/s-p-500-mem ... 64362.html
I do not think that if some games are being played by S&P that it would influence or hurt investor returns because the majority of the returns come from the top and S&P doesn't have much or any discretion on that. So, there's probably nothing to fear. (I will add that Tesla's late inclusion to the 500 index revealed S&P's methodology flaws in my opinion).
https://www.fa-mag.com/news/s-p-500-mem ... 64362.html
I do not think that if some games are being played by S&P that it would influence or hurt investor returns because the majority of the returns come from the top and S&P doesn't have much or any discretion on that. So, there's probably nothing to fear. (I will add that Tesla's late inclusion to the 500 index revealed S&P's methodology flaws in my opinion).
Powered by chocolate!
Re: Is S&P 500 Membership for Sale?
Interesting. Another reason to be happy using the total market tracking CRSP index.
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2021 9:46 am
Pay to Play? Anyone read this yet?
[Thread merged into here --admin LadyGeek]
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES
IS STOCK INDEX MEMBERSHIP FOR SALE?
Kun Li
Xin (Kelly) Liu
Shang-Jin Wei
Working Paper 29365
http://www.nber.org/papers/w29365
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
October 2021
From Reuters, 10/15/21 https://www.reuters.com/breakingviews/r ... 021-10-15/
"A working paper this month published by the National Bureau of Economic Research suggests companies that pay for credit ratings from S&P Global, which also owns the indexing business, “appear to improve their chance of entering the index.”
Causation is hard to demonstrate conclusively. But where humans participate in decisions that can involve billions of dollars, other humans will try to influence them, and still, others will become suspicious of their motives and incentives. When the sums involved reach trillions of dollars, the industry’s integrity is at stake."
Doesn't Warren Buffett own a significant stake in Moody's analytics? From the Abstract on the NBER Paper: "We show
that firms’ purchases of S&P ratings appear to improve their chance of entering the index (but
purchases of Moody’s ratings do not). Furthermore, firms tend to purchase more S&P ratings
when there are openings in the index membership. Such a pattern is also confirmed by an event
study that explores a rule change on index membership in 2002. Finally, discretionary additions
exhibit subsequent deterioration in financial performance relative to rule-based additions."
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES
IS STOCK INDEX MEMBERSHIP FOR SALE?
Kun Li
Xin (Kelly) Liu
Shang-Jin Wei
Working Paper 29365
http://www.nber.org/papers/w29365
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
October 2021
From Reuters, 10/15/21 https://www.reuters.com/breakingviews/r ... 021-10-15/
"A working paper this month published by the National Bureau of Economic Research suggests companies that pay for credit ratings from S&P Global, which also owns the indexing business, “appear to improve their chance of entering the index.”
Causation is hard to demonstrate conclusively. But where humans participate in decisions that can involve billions of dollars, other humans will try to influence them, and still, others will become suspicious of their motives and incentives. When the sums involved reach trillions of dollars, the industry’s integrity is at stake."
Doesn't Warren Buffett own a significant stake in Moody's analytics? From the Abstract on the NBER Paper: "We show
that firms’ purchases of S&P ratings appear to improve their chance of entering the index (but
purchases of Moody’s ratings do not). Furthermore, firms tend to purchase more S&P ratings
when there are openings in the index membership. Such a pattern is also confirmed by an event
study that explores a rule change on index membership in 2002. Finally, discretionary additions
exhibit subsequent deterioration in financial performance relative to rule-based additions."
Re: Pay to Play? Anyone read this yet?
There was another thread on this:
viewtopic.php?p=6277183
Limited response, but agree that total market is the way to go.
viewtopic.php?p=6277183
Limited response, but agree that total market is the way to go.
Re: Pay to Play? Anyone read this yet?
According to https://www.cnbc.com/berkshire-hathaway-portfolio/Jack&Warren disciple wrote: ↑Tue Oct 19, 2021 6:26 pm ...
Doesn't Warren Buffett own a significant stake in Moody's analytics?
Code: Select all
Company Symbol Holdings Mkt. price Value Stake
Moody’s Corporation MCO 24,669,778 $378.96 $9,348,859,071 13.2%
Re: Is S&P 500 Membership for Sale?
I merged Jack&Warren disciple's thread into the ongoing discussion.
(Thanks to the member who reported the post and provided a link to this thread.)
(Thanks to the member who reported the post and provided a link to this thread.)
Re: Is S&P 500 Membership for Sale?
EDIT - I think I am off point. The link is between payment for credit bond serves and inclusion into the index.
This is off point. As well as the title of this thread.
The article is about S&P's bond ratings, not about the S&P equity indexes.
I have not read the article but reporting and handling of this conflict of interest has been around for a long time.
Last edited by alex_686 on Tue Oct 19, 2021 8:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Former brokerage operations & mutual fund accountant. I hate risk, which is why I study and embrace it.
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2021 9:46 am
Re: Pay to Play? Anyone read this yet?
I switched over to the Russell 3000 from the S&P 500 around 2000 and now in the VTI. It holds about 1.1% in Berkshire Hathaway, the VTI probably also owns S&P, if it's publically traded. It just seems hard to miss out on prosperity with such a broad index like Russell 3000 or CRISP.sycamore wrote: ↑Tue Oct 19, 2021 7:36 pmAccording to https://www.cnbc.com/berkshire-hathaway-portfolio/Jack&Warren disciple wrote: ↑Tue Oct 19, 2021 6:26 pm ...
Doesn't Warren Buffett own a significant stake in Moody's analytics?which seems significant.Code: Select all
Company Symbol Holdings Mkt. price Value Stake Moody’s Corporation MCO 24,669,778 $378.96 $9,348,859,071 13.2%
-
- Posts: 25617
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:20 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Pay to Play? Anyone read this yet?
It is publicly traded - SPGI, prior to that it was part of McGraw-Hill Companies which was also publicly traded.Jack&Warren disciple wrote: ↑Tue Oct 19, 2021 7:57 pmI switched over to the Russell 3000 from the S&P 500 around 2000 and now in the VTI. It holds about 1.1% in Berkshire Hathaway, the VTI probably also owns S&P, if it's publically traded. It just seems hard to miss out on prosperity with such a broad index like Russell 3000 or CRISP.sycamore wrote: ↑Tue Oct 19, 2021 7:36 pmAccording to https://www.cnbc.com/berkshire-hathaway-portfolio/Jack&Warren disciple wrote: ↑Tue Oct 19, 2021 6:26 pm ...
Doesn't Warren Buffett own a significant stake in Moody's analytics?which seems significant.Code: Select all
Company Symbol Holdings Mkt. price Value Stake Moody’s Corporation MCO 24,669,778 $378.96 $9,348,859,071 13.2%
"One should invest based on their need, ability and willingness to take risk - Larry Swedroe" Asking Portfolio Questions