Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
Hi,
I am wondering if average folks here invest in Venture Capital, maybe like 5-10% of their portfolio?
I'm seeing several such platforms like AngelList, SeedInvest, WeFunder.
Do you think it's a good idea?
What's a good way to do so with $10-50K of capital?
Thanks.
I am wondering if average folks here invest in Venture Capital, maybe like 5-10% of their portfolio?
I'm seeing several such platforms like AngelList, SeedInvest, WeFunder.
Do you think it's a good idea?
What's a good way to do so with $10-50K of capital?
Thanks.
-
- Posts: 6234
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:28 am
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
No, if I were to chase additional risk I’d increase equities or SCV
Data for VC/PE/HF is very poor in aggregate for the investor, but quite good for the managers collecting obscene fees
Data for VC/PE/HF is very poor in aggregate for the investor, but quite good for the managers collecting obscene fees
20% VOO | 20% VXUS | 20% AVUV | 20% AVDV | 20% AVES
- Taylor Larimore
- Posts: 32842
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:09 pm
- Location: Miami FL
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
huzaing:huzaing wrote: ↑Thu Jul 29, 2021 10:16 am Hi,
I am wondering if average folks here invest in Venture Capital, maybe like 5-10% of their portfolio?
I'm seeing several such platforms like AngelList, SeedInvest, WeFunder.
Do you think it's a good idea?
What's a good way to do so with $10-50K of capital?
Thanks.
It is nearly always a mistake to invest in venture capital schemes. This is from Investopedia:
Best wishesAccording to recent research, the failure rate for a venture fund portfolio is 40% to 50% in a given year, and 90% of all companies invested in will not make it beyond the 10-year mark.
Taylor
Jack Bogle's Words of Wisdom: "Owning the total stock market is tax-efficient and cost-efficient." "Investing in equities entails four risks: stock risk, style risk, manager risk, and market risk. You can easily eliminate the first three of these risks simply by owning the entire stock market."
"Simplicity is the master key to financial success." -- Jack Bogle
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
I don't invest in anything that isn't liquid. No VC, no PE, no metals, no RE.
Don't trust me, look it up. https://www.irs.gov/forms-instructions-and-publications
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
Wouldn’t do it. Chances are very low you get the next Uber.
- AerialWombat
- Posts: 3106
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2018 1:07 pm
- Location: Cashtown, Cashylvania
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
deleted
Last edited by AerialWombat on Sat Feb 05, 2022 3:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This post is a work of fiction. Any similarity to real financial advice is purely coincidental.
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
No. No. and I wouldn't.
Link to Asking Portfolio Questions
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
High fee and illiquid, and also not going to make much of a difference with $10-50k. As mentioned upthread, most ventures blow up after a while. The good deals are available only to the top tier VC funds (due to name recognition and favorable publicity) and small time investor just couldn't get in these VCs (Sequoia and Kleiner Perkins type).
-
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 5:46 pm
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
I've looked into some of those websites like Angel List, but have never been able to find any ventures that seemed compelling enough to compensate for the very real risk of a total loss. From the start-up's point of view, if they had a compelling business model, why in the world would they want me, a nobody small investor, as an owner. As Groucho Marx said, "I don't care to join a club that would have me as a member."
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
I don't, although that may simply be a sign that I'm far below average.
Meet my pet, Peeve, who loves to convert non-acronyms into acronyms: FED, ROTH, CASH, IVY, ...
-
- Posts: 18502
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: 26 miles, 385 yards west of Copley Square
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
These investments fail my test for ROI.
(ROI = return OF investment)
(ROI = return OF investment)
Bogle: Smart Beta is stupid
-
- Posts: 1613
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2020 6:36 am
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
I have a very (very very very) tiny allocation to a couple Business Development Companies.
https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Busines ... nt_company
The largest firm in the space is ARES Capital Corporation (ARCC), another big player is Main Street Capital (MAIN). These are listed public companies, so BDC's are pretty liquid investments.
The annual expenses of these will whiten your teeth if you're accustomed to index funds, but given the oversight and management involvement required, I guess it's to be expected.
https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Busines ... nt_company
The largest firm in the space is ARES Capital Corporation (ARCC), another big player is Main Street Capital (MAIN). These are listed public companies, so BDC's are pretty liquid investments.
The annual expenses of these will whiten your teeth if you're accustomed to index funds, but given the oversight and management involvement required, I guess it's to be expected.
“Now shall I walk or shall I ride? |
'Ride,' Pleasure said; |
'Walk,' Joy replied.” |
|
― W.H. Davies
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
another idea is to invest in an ETF with venture-like characteristics (diversified holdings, liquidity, reasonable expenses, high risk/potential for high reward...).
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
I do invest in venture pretty actively.
The angel investing book listed in an earlier post is great, highly recommended.
You need to have enough capital to invest in a very large number (like 50-100) to have any reasonable shot of approaching the distribution of total venture returns. With smaller numbers of investments your probability of loss in early stage deals is quite high. At $10-20k total I don’t think the math works at all.
Second thing - you need to have a good way to access a high quality stream of deals - easier said than done. I am working with one of the older and well established investing syndicates, works almost like a distributed venture fund with full time management staff etc… I would NEVER try to do this on my own.
Results so far over almost 4 years are excellent, but I kind of fell into a good situation. As everyone says on this board, your mileage may vary - but sounds like venture might not be a great fit for your situation.
The angel investing book listed in an earlier post is great, highly recommended.
You need to have enough capital to invest in a very large number (like 50-100) to have any reasonable shot of approaching the distribution of total venture returns. With smaller numbers of investments your probability of loss in early stage deals is quite high. At $10-20k total I don’t think the math works at all.
Second thing - you need to have a good way to access a high quality stream of deals - easier said than done. I am working with one of the older and well established investing syndicates, works almost like a distributed venture fund with full time management staff etc… I would NEVER try to do this on my own.
Results so far over almost 4 years are excellent, but I kind of fell into a good situation. As everyone says on this board, your mileage may vary - but sounds like venture might not be a great fit for your situation.
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
So you are not talking about AngelList, right?Dhchicago wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:27 am I do invest in venture pretty actively.
The angel investing book listed in an earlier post is great, highly recommended.
You need to have enough capital to invest in a very large number (like 50-100) to have any reasonable shot of approaching the distribution of total venture returns. With smaller numbers of investments your probability of loss in early stage deals is quite high. At $10-20k total I don’t think the math works at all.
Second thing - you need to have a good way to access a high quality stream of deals - easier said than done. I am working with one of the older and well established investing syndicates, works almost like a distributed venture fund with full time management staff etc… I would NEVER try to do this on my own.
Results so far over almost 4 years are excellent, but I kind of fell into a good situation. As everyone says on this board, your mileage may vary - but sounds like venture might not be a great fit for your situation.
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
I'll check it out, thanks. Any idea if that one is more useful than this one I found earlier:AerialWombat wrote: ↑Thu Jul 29, 2021 11:27 am The best way to learn about angel investing is through a local angel conference or angel fund. Beware of funds that charge large up front fees to participate.
I also suggest reading this book:
https://www.amazon.com/Angel-Investing- ... 1118858255
https://www.amazon.com/Angel-Jason-Cala ... 071D6MRDT/
Thanks
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
Hi, so is it like you have to do the evaluation yourself?investorpeter wrote: ↑Thu Jul 29, 2021 11:57 am I've looked into some of those websites like Angel List, but have never been able to find any ventures that seemed compelling enough to compensate for the very real risk of a total loss. From the start-up's point of view, if they had a compelling business model, why in the world would they want me, a nobody small investor, as an owner. As Groucho Marx said, "I don't care to join a club that would have me as a member."
I had read that Meb Faber has some deals on AngelList that one can join? Would that not help since he might some good ones, no?
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
Maybe it's a mistake or bad idea for other reasons, but this reason doesn't seem valid to me:Taylor Larimore wrote: ↑Thu Jul 29, 2021 10:48 am
It is nearly always a mistake to invest in venture capital schemes. This is from Investopedia:Best wishesAccording to recent research, the failure rate for a venture fund portfolio is 40% to 50% in a given year, and 90% of all companies invested in will not make it beyond the 10-year mark.
Taylor
1. The high failure rate is already acknowledged and expected; it's inherent in this type of investing. Just like people who invest in the stock market with knowledge, already know that it will drop a big % at some point. Similarly, I don't think people who do Angel investing with knowledge are expecting a majority of the companies to make it. Agree, disagree?
2. Isn't the statistic above incomplete? What about the 10% that do make it beyond 10 years; what's their performance like?
3. Unless I'm misremembering, I think even with the stock market, the majority of the companies underperform the index and only a minority are responsible for the bulk of the index's return. Can someone correct me if this is wrong please?
- AerialWombat
- Posts: 3106
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2018 1:07 pm
- Location: Cashtown, Cashylvania
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
deleted
Last edited by AerialWombat on Sat Feb 05, 2022 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This post is a work of fiction. Any similarity to real financial advice is purely coincidental.
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
The best deals on AngelList and similar sites are extremely oversubscribed. As a result, your allocation will likely be squashed down significantly to the point where it's miniscule. The only way to avoid this is to have actual connections to the startup. Don't expect meaningful allocations for the best companies on AngelList, which are precisely the ones that you need to outperform. Reg CF sites such as WeFunder tend to be lower quality because crowdfunding is seen as a last resort for companies that can't raise VC funding. (This is unfortunate, but often true.)
I am an LP (Limited Partner) in a few VC funds and also angel invest in companies run by friends. I only had access to the VC funds because they invested in my own company and let me put in a small check. Most of these funds are capped at 100 or 250 investors by SEC regulations, so space is very limited and goes to people in the industry. These venture funds are raised privately so you need to know the partners to be able to get in. Many of them turn away people with a net worth under $5M, almost all turn away people with a net worth under $2.1M.
The current regulations put investors without connections and a significant net worth at a severe disadvantage. It's unfortunate and needs to be changed, but be careful with venture investing since the current regulations harm small investors. In the long term, I sincerely hope that this changes. In the short term, if you don't know the company or venture fund directly, you'll be in a much more difficult position.
I am an LP (Limited Partner) in a few VC funds and also angel invest in companies run by friends. I only had access to the VC funds because they invested in my own company and let me put in a small check. Most of these funds are capped at 100 or 250 investors by SEC regulations, so space is very limited and goes to people in the industry. These venture funds are raised privately so you need to know the partners to be able to get in. Many of them turn away people with a net worth under $5M, almost all turn away people with a net worth under $2.1M.
The current regulations put investors without connections and a significant net worth at a severe disadvantage. It's unfortunate and needs to be changed, but be careful with venture investing since the current regulations harm small investors. In the long term, I sincerely hope that this changes. In the short term, if you don't know the company or venture fund directly, you'll be in a much more difficult position.
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
Before I knew anything about Bogleheads way of investing, I put money in 6 private companies over 2018-19 through EquityZen. Results were pretty dismal until this year. This is how they have turned out so far:
Positions that had an exit:
Company Name, Amount Invested, Exit Value, Years illiquid
MapR, $10.5k, $0, 1 yr
Credit Karma, $10.5k, $16k, 1.5 yrs
Doximity, $11k, $192k, 2.5 yrs [This is still in IPO lockup, so value could be much different when I am actually able to sell in Decemeber]
Positions still illiquid:
Company Name, Amount Invested, Latest Value, Years illiquid
Offerup, $21k, $10k, 3.5
Thumbtack, $10.5K, $16k, 3.5
Sift Science, $11k, $36k, 2
So among companies that had an exit, first company went bankrupt, 2nd returned 50% in 1.5 year and 3rd really went bonkers(~17X) in 2 years.
And companies w/o an exit, 2/3 seem to be doing ok.
After starting on my boglehead journey from Feb 2020, I was just patiently waiting for these positions to liquidate and direct them to VTI/VXUS/VWO(I do tilt towards emerging markets). But seeing how Doximity exploded I have decided to keep some portion of my portfolio invested in PE just for few more years. This is my new algo:
a) Keep max 5 deals open(i.e without a liquidation event) at a time
b) Keep cost basis < $100k [This would be less than 5% of my total portfolio]
c) Only choose companies with market cap < $500M
Positions that had an exit:
Company Name, Amount Invested, Exit Value, Years illiquid
MapR, $10.5k, $0, 1 yr
Credit Karma, $10.5k, $16k, 1.5 yrs
Doximity, $11k, $192k, 2.5 yrs [This is still in IPO lockup, so value could be much different when I am actually able to sell in Decemeber]
Positions still illiquid:
Company Name, Amount Invested, Latest Value, Years illiquid
Offerup, $21k, $10k, 3.5
Thumbtack, $10.5K, $16k, 3.5
Sift Science, $11k, $36k, 2
So among companies that had an exit, first company went bankrupt, 2nd returned 50% in 1.5 year and 3rd really went bonkers(~17X) in 2 years.
And companies w/o an exit, 2/3 seem to be doing ok.
After starting on my boglehead journey from Feb 2020, I was just patiently waiting for these positions to liquidate and direct them to VTI/VXUS/VWO(I do tilt towards emerging markets). But seeing how Doximity exploded I have decided to keep some portion of my portfolio invested in PE just for few more years. This is my new algo:
a) Keep max 5 deals open(i.e without a liquidation event) at a time
b) Keep cost basis < $100k [This would be less than 5% of my total portfolio]
c) Only choose companies with market cap < $500M
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
Hi, I liked your post. Thanks for sharing this experience!!
Is EquityZen like an alternative to AngelList or in another category altogether?
As read I about this, accredited investor comes up, is that determined by the platform itself (by asking you questions?) or is it some official certification you need to get first by providing your statements, etc?
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
Amazing and very excellent post! I really appreciate that you shared first-hand knowledge.FItech wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 1:20 am The best deals on AngelList and similar sites are extremely oversubscribed. As a result, your allocation will likely be squashed down significantly to the point where it's miniscule. The only way to avoid this is to have actual connections to the startup. Don't expect meaningful allocations for the best companies on AngelList, which are precisely the ones that you need to outperform. Reg CF sites such as WeFunder tend to be lower quality because crowdfunding is seen as a last resort for companies that can't raise VC funding. (This is unfortunate, but often true.)
I am an LP (Limited Partner) in a few VC funds and also angel invest in companies run by friends. I only had access to the VC funds because they invested in my own company and let me put in a small check. Most of these funds are capped at 100 or 250 investors by SEC regulations, so space is very limited and goes to people in the industry. These venture funds are raised privately so you need to know the partners to be able to get in. Many of them turn away people with a net worth under $5M, almost all turn away people with a net worth under $2.1M.
The current regulations put investors without connections and a significant net worth at a severe disadvantage. It's unfortunate and needs to be changed, but be careful with venture investing since the current regulations harm small investors. In the long term, I sincerely hope that this changes. In the short term, if you don't know the company or venture fund directly, you'll be in a much more difficult position.
NOW it makes sense to me what was confusing earlier when I used to read about people investing in PayPal, Linkedin, etc in the very early stages.
It sounded like they had unique personal connections that made it possible for them to invest.
It would make me think:
If VC is such a bad idea (as implied by some folks above), then why are these wealthy, savvy and connected individuals not just putting all their money in index funds.
But now it *seems* like:
For us commoners, since the proper VC opportunities are not accessible, public indexing is the most suitable approach amongst what's left.
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
I haven't looked at AngelList in a while, if I remember correctly there used to be a lead investor and others just following whatever he is investing in. Equityzen just sources deals from current or ex employees or maybe even the company directly. You pay 5% commission on each deal though.huzaing wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 8:51 amHi, I liked your post. Thanks for sharing this experience!!
Is EquityZen like an alternative to AngelList or in another category altogether?
As read I about this, accredited investor comes up, is that determined by the platform itself (by asking you questions?) or is it some official certification you need to get first by providing your statements, etc?
Re: accredited investor, yes the platform will ask you questions. You either need to have $1M in assets outside of primary home or made $200k/year for last couple of years. Not sure what the repercussions are if you just say you have a $1M but not have them for real.
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
Thanks for sharing the infotodaysBob wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 6:06 pmI haven't looked at AngelList in a while, if I remember correctly there used to be a lead investor and others just following whatever he is investing in. Equityzen just sources deals from current or ex employees or maybe even the company directly. You pay 5% commission on each deal though.huzaing wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 8:51 amHi, I liked your post. Thanks for sharing this experience!!
Is EquityZen like an alternative to AngelList or in another category altogether?
As read I about this, accredited investor comes up, is that determined by the platform itself (by asking you questions?) or is it some official certification you need to get first by providing your statements, etc?
Re: accredited investor, yes the platform will ask you questions. You either need to have $1M in assets outside of primary home or made $200k/year for last couple of years. Not sure what the repercussions are if you just say you have a $1M but not have them for real.
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
I skim over any media content relating to startup culture, delete any podcast episode where a VC / startup founder is interviewed. Really boring, self-congratulatory stuff and is promoting "lottery ticket" investing. Liquid transparent public market investing via passive vehicles is for me.
Amateur Self-Taught Senior Macro Strategist
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
VC isn't a bad idea in absolute. VC just has power law returns.huzaing wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 9:50 amAmazing and very excellent post! I really appreciate that you shared first-hand knowledge.FItech wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 1:20 am The best deals on AngelList and similar sites are extremely oversubscribed. As a result, your allocation will likely be squashed down significantly to the point where it's miniscule. The only way to avoid this is to have actual connections to the startup. Don't expect meaningful allocations for the best companies on AngelList, which are precisely the ones that you need to outperform. Reg CF sites such as WeFunder tend to be lower quality because crowdfunding is seen as a last resort for companies that can't raise VC funding. (This is unfortunate, but often true.)
I am an LP (Limited Partner) in a few VC funds and also angel invest in companies run by friends. I only had access to the VC funds because they invested in my own company and let me put in a small check. Most of these funds are capped at 100 or 250 investors by SEC regulations, so space is very limited and goes to people in the industry. These venture funds are raised privately so you need to know the partners to be able to get in. Many of them turn away people with a net worth under $5M, almost all turn away people with a net worth under $2.1M.
The current regulations put investors without connections and a significant net worth at a severe disadvantage. It's unfortunate and needs to be changed, but be careful with venture investing since the current regulations harm small investors. In the long term, I sincerely hope that this changes. In the short term, if you don't know the company or venture fund directly, you'll be in a much more difficult position.
NOW it makes sense to me what was confusing earlier when I used to read about people investing in PayPal, Linkedin, etc in the very early stages.
It sounded like they had unique personal connections that made it possible for them to invest.
It would make me think:
If VC is such a bad idea (as implied by some folks above), then why are these wealthy, savvy and connected individuals not just putting all their money in index funds.
But now it *seems* like:
For us commoners, since the proper VC opportunities are not accessible, public indexing is the most suitable approach amongst what's left.
Ref: https://visible.vc/blog/understanding-t ... rve-of-vc/
Not all of that return goes to high end VCs but a lot of it does. Even within the VC industry you see this...the return delta between some firms and other firms is massive (ex: Sequoia, KPCB, Benchmark).
So to your point about savvy investors....savvy investors who are well connected in this space can get access to firms with a higher probability of being at the head of the curve.
I would strongly advise *not* investing in companies yourself on random sites. Unless you have material knowledge of these companies and can get an allocation through this vehicle it is unwise. The overwhelming probability is you'll lose $.
If you decide to enter tech and do this sort of work for a living this can change and VC can become a fine way to make a living. But it's more nuanced. I could write for pages on this. There are caveats abound.
Be careful & good luck.
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
Hi,evestor wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 10:10 amVC isn't a bad idea in absolute. VC just has power law returns.huzaing wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 9:50 amAmazing and very excellent post! I really appreciate that you shared first-hand knowledge.FItech wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 1:20 am The best deals on AngelList and similar sites are extremely oversubscribed. As a result, your allocation will likely be squashed down significantly to the point where it's miniscule. The only way to avoid this is to have actual connections to the startup. Don't expect meaningful allocations for the best companies on AngelList, which are precisely the ones that you need to outperform. Reg CF sites such as WeFunder tend to be lower quality because crowdfunding is seen as a last resort for companies that can't raise VC funding. (This is unfortunate, but often true.)
I am an LP (Limited Partner) in a few VC funds and also angel invest in companies run by friends. I only had access to the VC funds because they invested in my own company and let me put in a small check. Most of these funds are capped at 100 or 250 investors by SEC regulations, so space is very limited and goes to people in the industry. These venture funds are raised privately so you need to know the partners to be able to get in. Many of them turn away people with a net worth under $5M, almost all turn away people with a net worth under $2.1M.
The current regulations put investors without connections and a significant net worth at a severe disadvantage. It's unfortunate and needs to be changed, but be careful with venture investing since the current regulations harm small investors. In the long term, I sincerely hope that this changes. In the short term, if you don't know the company or venture fund directly, you'll be in a much more difficult position.
NOW it makes sense to me what was confusing earlier when I used to read about people investing in PayPal, Linkedin, etc in the very early stages.
It sounded like they had unique personal connections that made it possible for them to invest.
It would make me think:
If VC is such a bad idea (as implied by some folks above), then why are these wealthy, savvy and connected individuals not just putting all their money in index funds.
But now it *seems* like:
For us commoners, since the proper VC opportunities are not accessible, public indexing is the most suitable approach amongst what's left.
Ref: https://visible.vc/blog/understanding-t ... rve-of-vc/
Not all of that return goes to high end VCs but a lot of it does. Even within the VC industry you see this...the return delta between some firms and other firms is massive (ex: Sequoia, KPCB, Benchmark).
So to your point about savvy investors....savvy investors who are well connected in this space can get access to firms with a higher probability of being at the head of the curve.
I would strongly advise *not* investing in companies yourself on random sites. Unless you have material knowledge of these companies and can get an allocation through this vehicle it is unwise. The overwhelming probability is you'll lose $.
If you decide to enter tech and do this sort of work for a living this can change and VC can become a fine way to make a living. But it's more nuanced. I could write for pages on this. There are caveats abound.
Be careful & good luck.
Thanks for your input on this one. I found it very informative!
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
No.huzaing wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 3:43 pmSo you are not talking about AngelList, right?Dhchicago wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:27 am I do invest in venture pretty actively.
The angel investing book listed in an earlier post is great, highly recommended.
You need to have enough capital to invest in a very large number (like 50-100) to have any reasonable shot of approaching the distribution of total venture returns. With smaller numbers of investments your probability of loss in early stage deals is quite high. At $10-20k total I don’t think the math works at all.
Second thing - you need to have a good way to access a high quality stream of deals - easier said than done. I am working with one of the older and well established investing syndicates, works almost like a distributed venture fund with full time management staff etc… I would NEVER try to do this on my own.
Results so far over almost 4 years are excellent, but I kind of fell into a good situation. As everyone says on this board, your mileage may vary - but sounds like venture might not be a great fit for your situation.
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
Taylor’s stats are correct but his interpretation is silly. The distribution of returns (cross section) is a power curve - you definitely have to invest in it as an asset class across a wide range of deals, but the idea that nobody makes money in venture is a pretty strange one. If you have good access to deal flow via an established fund (preferably multiple) it is a reasonable place for a small fraction of a larger portfolio.huzaing wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 4:04 pmMaybe it's a mistake or bad idea for other reasons, but this reason doesn't seem valid to me:Taylor Larimore wrote: ↑Thu Jul 29, 2021 10:48 am
It is nearly always a mistake to invest in venture capital schemes. This is from Investopedia:Best wishesAccording to recent research, the failure rate for a venture fund portfolio is 40% to 50% in a given year, and 90% of all companies invested in will not make it beyond the 10-year mark.
Taylor
1. The high failure rate is already acknowledged and expected; it's inherent in this type of investing. Just like people who invest in the stock market with knowledge, already know that it will drop a big % at some point. Similarly, I don't think people who do Angel investing with knowledge are expecting a majority of the companies to make it. Agree, disagree?
2. Isn't the statistic above incomplete? What about the 10% that do make it beyond 10 years; what's their performance like?
3. Unless I'm misremembering, I think even with the stock market, the majority of the companies underperform the index and only a minority are responsible for the bulk of the index's return. Can someone correct me if this is wrong please?
- Noobvestor
- Posts: 5944
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:09 am
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
On a quick up ramp toward more wealth than I'd ever known, I got ahead of myself and did a bit of angel/venture investing a while back now ... and I've regretted it ever since. My returns have actually been pretty damn good, but the hassle of monitoring (not to mention tax forms) just wasn't worth it. I honestly don't even know if those investments on the whole have done better or worse than an index, but I'd take it back just to keep things simpler.
"In the absence of clarity, diversification is the only logical strategy" -= Larry Swedroe
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
Yes. This is good advice for most.evestor wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 10:10 amVC isn't a bad idea in absolute. VC just has power law returns.huzaing wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 9:50 amAmazing and very excellent post! I really appreciate that you shared first-hand knowledge.FItech wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 1:20 am The best deals on AngelList and similar sites are extremely oversubscribed. As a result, your allocation will likely be squashed down significantly to the point where it's miniscule. The only way to avoid this is to have actual connections to the startup. Don't expect meaningful allocations for the best companies on AngelList, which are precisely the ones that you need to outperform. Reg CF sites such as WeFunder tend to be lower quality because crowdfunding is seen as a last resort for companies that can't raise VC funding. (This is unfortunate, but often true.)
I am an LP (Limited Partner) in a few VC funds and also angel invest in companies run by friends. I only had access to the VC funds because they invested in my own company and let me put in a small check. Most of these funds are capped at 100 or 250 investors by SEC regulations, so space is very limited and goes to people in the industry. These venture funds are raised privately so you need to know the partners to be able to get in. Many of them turn away people with a net worth under $5M, almost all turn away people with a net worth under $2.1M.
The current regulations put investors without connections and a significant net worth at a severe disadvantage. It's unfortunate and needs to be changed, but be careful with venture investing since the current regulations harm small investors. In the long term, I sincerely hope that this changes. In the short term, if you don't know the company or venture fund directly, you'll be in a much more difficult position.
NOW it makes sense to me what was confusing earlier when I used to read about people investing in PayPal, Linkedin, etc in the very early stages.
It sounded like they had unique personal connections that made it possible for them to invest.
It would make me think:
If VC is such a bad idea (as implied by some folks above), then why are these wealthy, savvy and connected individuals not just putting all their money in index funds.
But now it *seems* like:
For us commoners, since the proper VC opportunities are not accessible, public indexing is the most suitable approach amongst what's left.
Ref: https://visible.vc/blog/understanding-t ... rve-of-vc/
Not all of that return goes to high end VCs but a lot of it does. Even within the VC industry you see this...the return delta between some firms and other firms is massive (ex: Sequoia, KPCB, Benchmark).
So to your point about savvy investors....savvy investors who are well connected in this space can get access to firms with a higher probability of being at the head of the curve.
I would strongly advise *not* investing in companies yourself on random sites. Unless you have material knowledge of these companies and can get an allocation through this vehicle it is unwise. The overwhelming probability is you'll lose $.
If you decide to enter tech and do this sort of work for a living this can change and VC can become a fine way to make a living. But it's more nuanced. I could write for pages on this. There are caveats abound.
Be careful & good luck.
- Noobvestor
- Posts: 5944
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:09 am
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
To add an anecdote: I was at a venture/angel event years ago, and watching presentations from new companies looking for money. During a smoke break, one of the presenters casually on the side said this was kind of a back up project for them, and inquired as to whether I would want to invest in their *new* venture (not the one they presented on stage). I as frankly floored - here was a guy who had just upsold an audience (me included!) on his amazing new business, but already his mind was elsewhere. So yeah, better to know the business and have real faith in the founders.Dhchicago wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 9:31 pmYes. This is good advice for most.evestor wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 10:10 am I would strongly advise *not* investing in companies yourself on random sites. Unless you have material knowledge of these companies and can get an allocation through this vehicle it is unwise. The overwhelming probability is you'll lose $.
If you decide to enter tech and do this sort of work for a living this can change and VC can become a fine way to make a living. But it's more nuanced. I could write for pages on this. There are caveats abound.
Be careful & good luck.
"In the absence of clarity, diversification is the only logical strategy" -= Larry Swedroe
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
I would be skeptical of VC investments as a retail investor. I doubt that the returns, especially risk adjusted, will be nearly enough to compensate you for a 5-7 year lock up period, plus whatever packaging fees are included to give you access to this product. More importantly, you probably won't get access to many blockbuster deals, since the most promising investments tend to be crowded by top VC firms.
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
Thanks for sharing this feedback!Noobvestor wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 9:28 pm On a quick up ramp toward more wealth than I'd ever known, I got ahead of myself and did a bit of angel/venture investing a while back now ... and I've regretted it ever since. My returns have actually been pretty damn good, but the hassle of monitoring (not to mention tax forms) just wasn't worth it. I honestly don't even know if those investments on the whole have done better or worse than an index, but I'd take it back just to keep things simpler.
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
Noobvestor wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 10:33 pmTo add an anecdote: I was at a venture/angel event years ago, and watching presentations from new companies looking for money. During a smoke break, one of the presenters casually on the side said this was kind of a back up project for them, and inquired as to whether I would want to invest in their *new* venture (not the one they presented on stage). I as frankly floored - here was a guy who had just upsold an audience (me included!) on his amazing new business, but already his mind was elsewhere. So yeah, better to know the business and have real faith in the founders.Dhchicago wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 9:31 pmYes. This is good advice for most.evestor wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 10:10 am I would strongly advise *not* investing in companies yourself on random sites. Unless you have material knowledge of these companies and can get an allocation through this vehicle it is unwise. The overwhelming probability is you'll lose $.
If you decide to enter tech and do this sort of work for a living this can change and VC can become a fine way to make a living. But it's more nuanced. I could write for pages on this. There are caveats abound.
Be careful & good luck.
Does AngelList do any of this better than other options?hi_there wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 10:59 pm I would be skeptical of VC investments as a retail investor. I doubt that the returns, especially risk adjusted, will be nearly enough to compensate you for a 5-7 year lock up period, plus whatever packaging fees are included to give you access to this product. More importantly, you probably won't get access to many blockbuster deals, since the most promising investments tend to be crowded by top VC firms.
-
- Posts: 49032
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:07 am
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
And we are 10 years into a bull cycle of VC investing.hi_there wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 10:59 pm I would be skeptical of VC investments as a retail investor. I doubt that the returns, especially risk adjusted, will be nearly enough to compensate you for a 5-7 year lock up period, plus whatever packaging fees are included to give you access to this product. More importantly, you probably won't get access to many blockbuster deals, since the most promising investments tend to be crowded by top VC firms.
There's always been booms and busts in VC investing.
The most opportunities to invest were in years like 1999/2000. These were also the worst years to invest (ask me how I know).
There's a huge amount of money that has gone into VC investing in the last few years (from Softbank on down). That has tended to boost the values of later stage investments - huge amounts of money can only crowd into those deals if the valuations are high enough - leading to self-reinforcing cycles.
You want to be doing venture investing where:
- you are sure you are investing alongside the smart money (top VC firms cut in other investors who bring something to the table - such as a successful entrepreneur might bring insight & deal flow) and not against it
- the industry is having one of its periodic droughts, and valuations have fallen. Also the filter is tougher - the deals that make it to investors are usually less "me too" and better thought out, with stronger Founders etc.
- Noobvestor
- Posts: 5944
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:09 am
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
I'm not exactly sure what you're asking, but AngelList is like (stretched analogy) the Facebook of angel/venture investing. If it's on there, it's already pretty public, and if it's already pretty public, the good deals were likely at earlier stages (or: it's a crappy company needing funds). It's hard to overstate how insider-y the early-stage investment community is, at least in Silicon Valley where I was when I was a bit more into this stuff. Even things I got to 'relatively early' still had seed money in them that would return a ton more than later-series funding from folks like me.huzaing wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:26 amNoobvestor wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 10:33 pmTo add an anecdote: I was at a venture/angel event years ago, and watching presentations from new companies looking for money. During a smoke break, one of the presenters casually on the side said this was kind of a back up project for them, and inquired as to whether I would want to invest in their *new* venture (not the one they presented on stage). I as frankly floored - here was a guy who had just upsold an audience (me included!) on his amazing new business, but already his mind was elsewhere. So yeah, better to know the business and have real faith in the founders.Dhchicago wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 9:31 pmYes. This is good advice for most.evestor wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 10:10 am I would strongly advise *not* investing in companies yourself on random sites. Unless you have material knowledge of these companies and can get an allocation through this vehicle it is unwise. The overwhelming probability is you'll lose $.
If you decide to enter tech and do this sort of work for a living this can change and VC can become a fine way to make a living. But it's more nuanced. I could write for pages on this. There are caveats abound.
Be careful & good luck.Does AngelList do any of this better than other options?hi_there wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 10:59 pm I would be skeptical of VC investments as a retail investor. I doubt that the returns, especially risk adjusted, will be nearly enough to compensate you for a 5-7 year lock up period, plus whatever packaging fees are included to give you access to this product. More importantly, you probably won't get access to many blockbuster deals, since the most promising investments tend to be crowded by top VC firms.
In short: unless you really are in the thick of this industry, I would highly recommend avoiding it entirely. I was probably more 'in the know' than 99% of the public (just through luck/timing/location), and I still felt woefully behind the really in-the-know folks who got in on the ground level. Really well-positioned startups know people with money - it's self-reinforcing: they have connections, get money, get support, get promoted, etc.... Truly raw startups, no matter how innovative they may seem (or even be) rarely get out the gate without serious connections these days. /2 cents
"In the absence of clarity, diversification is the only logical strategy" -= Larry Swedroe
-
- Posts: 49032
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:07 am
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
I was in London not the Valley, and in VC there is "the Valley" and there is everywhere else* (basically nowhere else).Noobvestor wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:39 pm
I'm not exactly sure what you're asking, but AngelList is like (stretched analogy) the Facebook of angel/venture investing. If it's on there, it's already pretty public, and if it's already pretty public, the good deals were likely at earlier stages (or: it's a crappy company needing funds). It's hard to overstate how insider-y the early-stage investment community is, at least in Silicon Valley where I was when I was a bit more into this stuff. Even things I got to 'relatively early' still had seed money in them that would return a ton more than later-series funding from folks like me.
In short: unless you really are in the thick of this industry, I would highly recommend avoiding it entirely. I was probably more 'in the know' than 99% of the public (just through luck/timing/location), and I still felt woefully behind the really in-the-know folks who got in on the ground level. Really well-positioned startups know people with money - it's self-reinforcing: they have connections, get money, get support, get promoted, etc.... Truly raw startups, no matter how innovative they may seem (or even be) rarely get out the gate without serious connections these days. /2 cents
But what you say rings totally true to me, as well.
Another thing I experienced was that when the VC money comes in, it often comes in on terms that crush the previous Angel Investor rounds. Founders get compensated (because their presence is necessary to the success of the venture). Third Party, non professional money? No.
I can name companies that eventually made 10x the valuation I invested in on, but because of the way the VC money came in during the downturn, my return was 1x.
You absolutely need the 10x+ ones to pay for all the ones that are writeoffs or "the living dead".
* Boston, at times and places, has been a successful area for venture investing. Still is in Life Sciences, I believe. London was looking good for Fintech, but then Brexit happened, now I am not so sure (the Financial Services industry in the UK expected to be a central concern of UK govt in its negotiations with the EU, in the end they were not granted even regulatory equivalence; amazing how all that political power & influence that they had in the 90s and 2000s just evaporated).
It should be noted that there is amazing technology in Europe. But the ecosystems which turn those start-ups into billion dollar companies are just not as developed, or not as successful. I think they tend to get bought by US (or nowadays, Far Eastern) tech companies for maybe $100m.
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
Noobvestor wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:39 pm
I'm not exactly sure what you're asking, but AngelList is like (stretched analogy) the Facebook of angel/venture investing.
Thanks for sharing the feedback, I think I understand, perhaps just slightly better, the challenges involved.Valuethinker wrote: ↑Fri Aug 06, 2021 8:53 am I was in London not the Valley, and in VC there is "the Valley" and there is everywhere else* (basically nowhere else).
But what you say rings totally true to me, as well.
What I meant to further clarify on was whether the AngelList Access Fund solves any of the difficulties?
- Because the selection is done by them, so likely would be better than an average person, I imagine?
- You are getting multiple deals (150-200), so maybe higher chance of getting a hit than investing in individual deals?
-
- Posts: 3565
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:42 pm
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
The compelling opportunities in venture capital never make it into open ended VC funds available to small investors. Compelling VC opportunities are snapped up quickly by private VC groups like Andreesen Horowitz. Individual investors have essentially zero chance of getting in on the most attractive VC opportunities. Great VC deals get oversubscribed instantly by experienced savvy VC groups that keep their their asset bases small enough to be manageable. They are not interested in selling shares to small investors. What is left over after the VC cream has been carefully removed winds up in funds open to individual investors.
If you have special insight into a specific VC firm, reliable critical knowledge that the market does not have, it may make sense to take a flyer on it with a modest portion of your portfolio. Otherwise most small investors in VC are very likely not to be rewarded adequately for the huge level of risk they take. The risk is very likely to show up, the reward much less so. These investments are illiquid for a long period of years and carry very high risk for that entire time period. There is a real chance of massive loss, approaching 100%. The reward, if it comes at all, is way down the road. My advice as one who has tried VC investing: do not play in this sandbox unless you really know what you're doing because others in this particular sandbox know exactly what they're doing and snap up the very few likely winners, leaving the huge mass of losers for the others to share. Just my 2 cents worth.
Garland Whizzer
If you have special insight into a specific VC firm, reliable critical knowledge that the market does not have, it may make sense to take a flyer on it with a modest portion of your portfolio. Otherwise most small investors in VC are very likely not to be rewarded adequately for the huge level of risk they take. The risk is very likely to show up, the reward much less so. These investments are illiquid for a long period of years and carry very high risk for that entire time period. There is a real chance of massive loss, approaching 100%. The reward, if it comes at all, is way down the road. My advice as one who has tried VC investing: do not play in this sandbox unless you really know what you're doing because others in this particular sandbox know exactly what they're doing and snap up the very few likely winners, leaving the huge mass of losers for the others to share. Just my 2 cents worth.
Garland Whizzer
- Noobvestor
- Posts: 5944
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:09 am
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
I think you're trying to apply the logic of indexing public companies to a space that is totally different. It's not like you're getting a little slice of every startup - you're getting slices of ones that can't get funding other ways and fall back on a suboptimal strategy. Basically, the result is a collection of startups that are almost certainly subpar. The only analogy that does apply perhaps is active management, but not the way you think: having managers pick for you is a good way to lose money, not make money. Managers win either way because you pay a fee. Your incentives aren't aligned.huzaing wrote: ↑Fri Aug 06, 2021 10:00 amNoobvestor wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:39 pm
I'm not exactly sure what you're asking, but AngelList is like (stretched analogy) the Facebook of angel/venture investing.Thanks for sharing the feedback, I think I understand, perhaps just slightly better, the challenges involved.Valuethinker wrote: ↑Fri Aug 06, 2021 8:53 am I was in London not the Valley, and in VC there is "the Valley" and there is everywhere else* (basically nowhere else).
But what you say rings totally true to me, as well.
What I meant to further clarify on was whether the AngelList Access Fund solves any of the difficulties?
- Because the selection is done by them, so likely would be better than an average person, I imagine?
- You are getting multiple deals (150-200), so maybe higher chance of getting a hit than investing in individual deals?
So ... couuld you get a hit amidst the duds? Sure, that's always possible, but the odds are against you in multiple ways. I would avoid this.
"In the absence of clarity, diversification is the only logical strategy" -= Larry Swedroe
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
Noobvestor wrote: ↑Fri Aug 06, 2021 12:43 pm Basically, the result is a collection of startups that are almost certainly subpar. The only analogy that does apply perhaps is active management, but not the way you think: having managers pick for you is a good way to lose money, not make money. Managers win either way because you pay a fee. Your incentives aren't aligned.
So ... couuld you get a hit amidst the duds? Sure, that's always possible, but the odds are against you in multiple ways. I would avoid this.
Being new and curious about this, I was reading some more and saw this.
Questions:
1. Do you think that those who participated in this fund got a great deal/returns (due to the two companies)? If so, does it sound like it's worth it to allocate a small portion (like 5%)?
2. Is your main point that even getting companies like those highlighted would not be worth it overall, or is it that finding such companies going forward would be a very very low chance?
Thanks
- Noobvestor
- Posts: 5944
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:09 am
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
> 1. Do you think that those who participated in this fund got a great deal/returns (due to the two companies)?huzaing wrote: ↑Fri Aug 06, 2021 1:20 pmNoobvestor wrote: ↑Fri Aug 06, 2021 12:43 pm Basically, the result is a collection of startups that are almost certainly subpar. The only analogy that does apply perhaps is active management, but not the way you think: having managers pick for you is a good way to lose money, not make money. Managers win either way because you pay a fee. Your incentives aren't aligned.
So ... couuld you get a hit amidst the duds? Sure, that's always possible, but the odds are against you in multiple ways. I would avoid this.
Being new and curious about this, I was reading some more and saw this.
Questions:
1. Do you think that those who participated in this fund got a great deal/returns (due to the two companies)? If so, does it sound like it's worth it to allocate a small portion (like 5%)?
2. Is your main point that even getting companies like those highlighted would not be worth it overall, or is it that finding such companies going forward would be a very very low chance?
Thanks
Past tense, maybe, but who cares? You can't time travel backward. And statistically, some people will guess right. Doesn't mean they're skilled. Everyone always gets pumped about the people who called this or timed that, but roll the dice and someone will always get it right by accident. The financial industry is littered with one-hit wonders ... people who make one right call, parlayed that call into a fund, drew in money and lost big.
I also have no idea from that screenshot what they got when, or how much they paid for their stake at what stage - it's (suspiciously?) not on that page. Clearly, they're putting out the info that makes them look good. Note that their winners are listed as a 'select track record' - shoot, I could invest in 300 startups and get lucky on a few (I actually did get lucky on a few, come to think of it), but if I don't share all the ones that crashed and burned, you're just looking at survivorship bias - a carefully curated 'here's where I did well' list while I push all my failures under the rug.
> 2. Is your main point that even getting companies like those highlighted would not be worth it overall, or is it that finding such companies going forward would be a very very low chance?
Again, I don't care about the companies highlighted - of course getting in on Uber early as great for those who did it. That's the past, though. Pick hundreds of people who tried, then delete out the ones who don't brag their losses and someone invariably will remain and look good on paper. I'm not sure in which threads offhand, but Nisiprius (a veteran forum member) regularly posts the speculator failures of once-successful managers. So really, it's both - I wouldn't expect their success to persist, but I also don't know what they paid when to get in. Shoot, I could invest in Uber today, then add it to my list of things I've invested in. Or I could have gotten in at a late stage and higher valuation. Big difference from early seed money.
Something to consider about active managers, like this guy and otherwise: if they're so amazing and find all the best deals, why are they sharing that with you? Why do they need your fees? Why aren't they just leveraging themselves to the hilt and retiring as billionaires? Why aren't they constantly maxed out on investors who have tons of money and can see what geniuses they are, versus having to market themselves to you or me?
I visited that guy's full page and to be frank he looks like a snake oil salesman. 2 and 20 is pretty common for expense ratio and carry, but it's still highway robbery. So you pay 2% no matter what, then 20% of your gains (if/when you have any). Yikes. I Googled the guy and found him saying his interests are aligned with yours, which, OK, the 20% part is, sure, but the 2% part he gets no matter what. If he can get hundreds of millions of dollars invested under his management, he'll be just fine even if all his picks going forward are duds - he can thrive on that ER alone. Sure, he'd like to also get bonuses on the carry side, but that's just gravy - he wins even if you lose. That's not 'aligned interests' in my book.
The whole point of passive investing is (1) you pay less to get the market return, (2) you don't have to worry about someone between you and your money. There's no single point of failure with the market - you just get what it is. As soon as you add a manager between you and the market, they could have a bad day, week, month, year, decade ... the past is riddled with folks who got lucky, parlayed fame into fees and then did terribly. So active management even with low fees, like 0.5% to 1%, statistically does worse than indexing - these expenses are much higher. I have a policy of reducing points of failure - I refuse to let a manager of any kind get between me and my money, because humans make mistakes.
Here's the billion dollar question, though: what's causing the rise of this kind of investing? Is it generous rich people who want to share the wealth? Or is it folks who see an opportunity to make easy money by convincing you they can manage your wealth? We see this same story play out over and over again, from Edward Jones to Cathy Woods - the fees are where they make their money. And some (like Woods) even succeed for a while, but almost invariably their returns come back down to Earth and fees erode your gains. Even Buffett has lost his edge. But I digress. Bottom line: you're hearing from me and a lot of others in this thread that this approach is a bad idea - I strongly suggest listening to what folks are saying on this front. And if you're looking for support for why you *should* go this route, try to find it outside of the sales material from the people who want your money. It should go without saying, but if you want to see if something is a good deal, look (far) beyond their marketing material for what they're selling.
"In the absence of clarity, diversification is the only logical strategy" -= Larry Swedroe
-
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 5:46 pm
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
A quick Google search reveals that is Naval Ravikant, co-founder, chairman, and former CEO of AngelList. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Ravikant Investors in that fund may have done well, but I doubt that fund is representative of what is available.huzaing wrote: ↑Fri Aug 06, 2021 1:20 pmNoobvestor wrote: ↑Fri Aug 06, 2021 12:43 pm Basically, the result is a collection of startups that are almost certainly subpar. The only analogy that does apply perhaps is active management, but not the way you think: having managers pick for you is a good way to lose money, not make money. Managers win either way because you pay a fee. Your incentives aren't aligned.
So ... couuld you get a hit amidst the duds? Sure, that's always possible, but the odds are against you in multiple ways. I would avoid this.
Being new and curious about this, I was reading some more and saw this.
Questions:
1. Do you think that those who participated in this fund got a great deal/returns (due to the two companies)? If so, does it sound like it's worth it to allocate a small portion (like 5%)?
2. Is your main point that even getting companies like those highlighted would not be worth it overall, or is it that finding such companies going forward would be a very very low chance?
Thanks
-
- Posts: 25625
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:20 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
That's not venture capital, its making leveraged loans to established companies. "We seek to originate investments in market-leading companies with a history of stable cash flows, proven competitive advantages and experienced management teams". They are also subject to certain SEC requirements including meeting a minimum asset coverage test among other required reporting. Some BDC's are more highly levered or invest in lower tier securities and their definition of "middle market" can be a stretch from true middle market companies. I wouldn't go so far as to say they are pretty liquid investments either, when liquidity driven events happen like March 2020 and/or they actually get into difficulties the value of the shares are affected by at least two variables - the value of the underlying portfolio companies and what is occurring in the general markets. Reading an actual 10-K will be instructional and recommended for any singular investment made in an individual security, that is not exclusive to BDC's as they will specifically spell out the risks and the expense ratio is the least of it.backpacker61 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 29, 2021 5:36 pm I have a very (very very very) tiny allocation to a couple Business Development Companies.
https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Busines ... nt_company
The largest firm in the space is ARES Capital Corporation (ARCC), another big player is Main Street Capital (MAIN). These are listed public companies, so BDC's are pretty liquid investments.
The annual expenses of these will whiten your teeth if you're accustomed to index funds, but given the oversight and management involvement required, I guess it's to be expected.
Venture capital is extending money in return for private placement equity and/or debt to people with "ideas or concepts that have not been proven or generate unstable flows of revenues from concentrated areas and cash flow is usually negative with inexperienced management.
Personally, I stick to small value, but one might consider micro cap investing to be closer to holding more riskier assets. There are a few microcap funds out there available in public realm.
Alternatively, some might consider buying the underlying investment manager's equity - there are several out there - Blackstone, Carlyle, KKR etc.
"One should invest based on their need, ability and willingness to take risk - Larry Swedroe" Asking Portfolio Questions
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
Yes, that's sort of what I'm trying to doNoobvestor wrote: ↑Fri Aug 06, 2021 2:34 pm I strongly suggest listening to what folks are saying on this front. And if you're looking for support for why you *should* go this route, try to find it outside of the sales material from the people who want your money. It should go without saying, but if you want to see if something is a good deal, look (far) beyond their marketing material for what they're selling.
I really like your feedback and analysis. I've highlighted this part because it stood out as very useful.
Thanks again!
Something I'm curious about and would appreciate comment on:
1. If these people (the one in the photo or those you mentioned) make a lot of money doing what they do, e.g. entrepreneurship, or collecting the 2% fees, etc (and I am sure their net worth is much, much larger than indexers), then why isn't that promoted or recommended?
2. If the answer is that it's actually a losing proposition, then these people are themselves very savvy, intelligent and sophisticated. So why are they not just investing in an index fund and calling it a day? I am sure they know all about indexing and efficient markets and modern portfolio theory, etc.
-
- Posts: 25625
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:20 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
Why does one purchase a lottery ticket in tonight’s Powerball when they know that buying the ticket is a sure loser except for the one or the very few who actually win the jackpot prize? Think greed or perhaps just the thought of being a big winner in some investment you’ve made. Ask yourself the same question? Why are you so willing to part with $10-$50k?huzaing wrote: ↑Sat Aug 07, 2021 2:45 pmYes, that's sort of what I'm trying to doNoobvestor wrote: ↑Fri Aug 06, 2021 2:34 pm I strongly suggest listening to what folks are saying on this front. And if you're looking for support for why you *should* go this route, try to find it outside of the sales material from the people who want your money. It should go without saying, but if you want to see if something is a good deal, look (far) beyond their marketing material for what they're selling.
I really like your feedback and analysis. I've highlighted this part because it stood out as very useful.
Thanks again!
Something I'm curious about and would appreciate comment on:
1. If these people (the one in the photo or those you mentioned) make a lot of money doing what they do, e.g. entrepreneurship, or collecting the 2% fees, etc (and I am sure their net worth is much, much larger than indexers), then why isn't that promoted or recommended?
2. If the answer is that it's actually a losing proposition, then these people are themselves very savvy, intelligent and sophisticated. So why are they not just investing in an index fund and calling it a day? I am sure they know all about indexing and efficient markets and modern portfolio theory, etc.
"One should invest based on their need, ability and willingness to take risk - Larry Swedroe" Asking Portfolio Questions
- Yesterdaysnews
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2014 1:25 pm
- Location: Sugar Land, TX
Re: Do you invest in Venture Capital as a small investor?
I listen to the “All in podcast” and these guys are all crazy rich but don’t seem to have any particular special insight. They are connected guys with who got into the tech industry at the right time and have printed money. Lots of luck and connections at play, the rest of us mere mortals are better off in public markets.