investing in short term treasury vs CDs
investing in short term treasury vs CDs
Is the expected return of short term treasuries and CDs about the same?
Does the FDCIC insurance equate to higher safety or just lower volatility?
Does the FDCIC insurance equate to higher safety or just lower volatility?
Last edited by bb on Sat Feb 02, 2019 9:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2018 10:54 am
Re: expected return of short term treasuries vs CDs
Yes, they’re close. For example, SCHO currently yields 2.5% while 2-year CDs are around 2.65%. The treasuries are more liquid though, and if you live in a state with high taxes like CA, the treasuries will likely return a bit more after taxes.
- gmaynardkrebs
- Posts: 2339
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:48 am
Re: expected return of short term treasuries vs CDs
I'm not sure what you mean by "expected" return The interest rate is known with certainty at issuance for T-bills, and for plain-vanilla fixed term CDs. If you mean the "usual" return, it is true that if you shop around, you can usually get a slightly better rate with a CD. However, the latter are subject to state income tax, so you would want to figure that into your comparison if applicable, as well any penalties for early withdrawl. For all practical purposes they are equally safe and completely guaranteed, although FDIC insurance is limited per institution. The FDIC insurance has nothing to do with volatility as far as I know. Why do you think it might?
Re: expected return of short term treasuries vs CDs
Sorry - I was thinking of a short term treasury fund - so value will fluctuate - which I was equating to safety or volatility - as compared to a CD. And also if interest rates go down presumably value of fund would go up - so that is why I used the word expected. Note - not that I am using correct language for this discussion.
- gmaynardkrebs
- Posts: 2339
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:48 am
Re: expected return of short term treasuries vs CDs
yes, a short term treasury fund will fluctuate, and you could even lose a little money. However, there is no default risk, same as with an FDIC insured account, provided you are not over the FDIC limit for that bank.bb wrote: ↑Sat Feb 02, 2019 5:18 pm Sorry - I was thinking of a short term treasury fund - so value will fluctuate - which I was equating to safety or volatility - as compared to a CD. And also if interest rates go down presumably value of fund would go up - so that is why I used the word expected. Note - not that I am using correct language for this discussion.
Re: investing in short term treasury vs CDs
I've read FDIC insurance only covers the return of principal with CDs, whereas with Treasuries both your principal and the interest coupons are guaranteed. Could someone confirm this? It's probably not a big deal either way though.
EDIT: Thanks RickBoglehead, please see his response below.
EDIT: Thanks RickBoglehead, please see his response below.
Last edited by Day9 on Sun Feb 03, 2019 12:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm just a fan of the person I got my user name from
-
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:28 pm
Re: investing in short term treasury vs CDs
I've been wondering about a similar question: Does anyone have a sense, historically, of how Treasury bills have compared to savings-accounts rates at banks? I wasn't able to find good data about this online.
In the extremely low-rate environment after the 2008 financial crisis, good banks tended to do better than Treasury bills and money-market funds, but that has recently changed. I'm curious if anyone has a memory or perspective on the same comparison over the last several decades. To make it concrete, would a fund like VUSXX have done better than the best savings accounts you could find at a bank through most of the past 50 years? (In other words, was the low-rate environment after the 2008 financial crisis aberrational in this respect?)
In the extremely low-rate environment after the 2008 financial crisis, good banks tended to do better than Treasury bills and money-market funds, but that has recently changed. I'm curious if anyone has a memory or perspective on the same comparison over the last several decades. To make it concrete, would a fund like VUSXX have done better than the best savings accounts you could find at a bank through most of the past 50 years? (In other words, was the low-rate environment after the 2008 financial crisis aberrational in this respect?)
-
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 10:14 pm
Re: investing in short term treasury vs CDs
I think I saw a graph on this site within the last few months that showed historical CD rates vs Treasury rates; my impression was that sometimes one is higher and sometimes the other is higher.
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you.
- RickBoglehead
- Posts: 7877
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:10 am
- Location: In a house
Re: investing in short term treasury vs CDs
That is false. Via Google:
FDIC insurance covers depositors' accounts at each insured bank, dollar-for-dollar, including principal and any accrued interest through the date of the insured bank's closing, up to the insurance limit. The standard insurance amount is $250,000 per person, per bank, per ownership category. Additional information on deposit insurance coverage can be found in the Your Insured Deposits brochure.
https://www.fdic.gov/deposit/covered/notinsured.html
Avid user of forums on variety of interests-financial, home brewing, F-150, EV, home repair, etc. Enjoy learning & passing on knowledge. It's PRINCIPAL, not PRINCIPLE. I ADVISE you to seek ADVICE.
Re: investing in short term treasury vs CDs
If short term treasury and CDs have about the same yield, and if principal and interest is protected for a CD aren't CDs a superior investment?
Re: expected return of short term treasuries vs CDs
NFCU is offering 17 mo CDs at 3.25%, I stopped re-investments on my T-Bill ladder and am going to throw it in that CD.michaeljmroger wrote: ↑Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:45 am Yes, they’re close. For example, SCHO currently yields 2.5% while 2-year CDs are around 2.65%. The treasuries are more liquid though, and if you live in a state with high taxes like CA, the treasuries will likely return a bit more after taxes.
-
- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 11:27 am
Re: investing in short term treasury vs CDs
Short Term Treasuries are
1) Direct US Gov Obligations, so have even more protection
2) Are more liquid
3) Are state tax free
Re: investing in short term treasury vs CDs
Also, a ST Treasury bond fund position can adjust to increasing interest rates and increasing inflation.
Re: investing in short term treasury vs CDs
Which one is a better investment?
Re: investing in short term treasury vs CDs
It depends. I like the ST Treasury fund instead of CDs of comparable duration, except when I can get a good rate such as the 3.25% deal JTColton mentioned above.
- gmaynardkrebs
- Posts: 2339
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:48 am
-
- Posts: 2327
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:36 pm
Re: investing in short term treasury vs CDs
The Vanguard Treasury Money Market Fund (2.32% yield) is actually a better deal than the Short-Term Treasury Fund (2.51% yield) because the increase in yield is only 10.5 basis points per year of increased duration when using the short-term fund.
VT 60% / VFSUX 20% / TIPS 20%
- gmaynardkrebs
- Posts: 2339
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:48 am
Re: investing in short term treasury vs CDs
I don't know how much money you have, and I don't want to know, but if it's less than $100K and you are alert enough to make sure the interest rates are roughly comparable, the difference is not worth pondering.