Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Have a question about your personal investments? No matter how simple or complex, you can ask it here.
Post Reply
Topic Author
Bill Bernstein
Posts: 853
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:47 am

Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by Bill Bernstein »

Hi all:

Just for chuckles, I compared the returns as of 1/18 for the first 9 Admiral/ETF pairs that came to mind.
In each and every case, the Admiral class shares beat the ETF shares. In each case, I chose the longest Morningstar eval period:
VTSAX/VTI 10 bp over 15 years
VFIAX/VOO 17 bp over 10 years
VEUSX/VGK 7 bp over 15 years
VPADX/VPL 12 bp over 15 years
VEMAX/VWO 4 bp over 15 years
VIVAX/VTV 9 bp over 15 years
VSIAX/VBR 23 bp over 10 years
VIMAX/VO 12 bp over 15 years
VTIAX/VXUS 17 bp over 10 years

I didn’t run the full list—I didn’t do small and mid-cap growth, and there are probably a few others I missed.

There are two possible explanations for this: “Drip drag” (delayed reinvestment of dividends) doesn’t make sense, since if stocks return 10% pa, that’s about 4bp per trading day on the dividend amount, which calculates out to much less than 0.1 bp.

The other explanation, suggested to me by Rick Ferri, is the time difference between ETF closing calculation and mutual fund closing calculation. If this is the real explanation, then is there an inherent bias favoring the open end fund over the ETF?

I’d be interested to see what other BH’s think. Because of sheer inertia, I've always favored Admiral over ETFs, but now maybe there's some data in back of that inertia.

I'd be very interested to see what other BHs think.

Bill
livesoft
Posts: 86079
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:00 pm

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by livesoft »

How did you account for the facts that dividends|distributions are paid on different days and reinvested on different days (so at different values) by different brokerages? I would think these differences could account for several bps over many years.
Wiki This signature message sponsored by sscritic: Learn to fish.
absolute zero
Posts: 1244
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2016 3:59 pm

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by absolute zero »

Maybe use the full time period that both funds have existed rather than 10 or 15 years. In portfolio visualizer I see the following (using full time period):
VTI/VTSAX: ETF outperforms by 2 bps
VOO/VFIAX: MF outperforms by 2 bps
VWO/VEMAX: MF outperforms by 1 bp
VTV/VIVAX: ETF outperforms by 14 bps
VTV/VVIAX: ETF & MF have same CAGR
VGK/VEUSX: MF outperforms by 4 bps

I didn’t run all of the ones that you did, just the ones above. I’m not sure that I’m seeing a trend here.
Last edited by absolute zero on Wed Jan 19, 2022 7:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
retired@50
Posts: 12833
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2019 2:36 pm
Location: Living in the U.S.A.

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by retired@50 »

Bill Bernstein wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 7:01 pm I’d be interested to see what other BH’s think. Because of sheer inertia, I've always favored Admiral over ETFs, but now maybe there's some data in back of that inertia.

I'd be very interested to see what other BHs think.

Bill
I don't have an explanation for the small performance differences, but in my case I've been using Admiral shares as a guardrail to stay away from intra-day trading. I'm okay with all my purchases and redemptions happening at NAV prices.

Like many folks, I suspected that this was costing me 1 or 2 basis points, but evidently not. :happy

Regards,
If liberty means anything at all it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. -George Orwell
retiringwhen
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2017 10:09 am
Location: New Jersey, USA

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by retiringwhen »

Could the simplest explanation be that for most of those 10 or 15 years, the Admiral shares had slightly lower Expense Ratios than the ETF?

The drop in ERs for ETFs to become lower only happened in 2019/early 2020 if I remember correctly.
Topic Author
Bill Bernstein
Posts: 853
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:47 am

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by Bill Bernstein »

Thanks for the visualizer data.

Comparing the two, I have to wonder if there isn't some sort of bias in one or the other database. For example, for VTV/VVIAX, the 15 year data shows the Admiral fund up by 9 bp, starting in early 2007 but visualizer, i assume, starts with incep in mid-2004, shows the ETF up by 14 bps/y?

That's a heck of a swing, about 3.5% of total return, in the 2.5 years between those two start dates.

Or, alternatively, this may have been a relatively recent change in the way that Vanguard operates the different classes?

Be interested to see what others find and think.

Bill
absolute zero
Posts: 1244
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2016 3:59 pm

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by absolute zero »

Bill Bernstein wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 7:41 pm Comparing the two, I have to wonder if there isn't some sort of bias in one or the other database. For example, for VTV/VVIAX, the 15 year data shows the ETF up by 9 bp, starting in early 2007 but visualizer, i assume, starts with incep in mid-2004, shows the ETF up by 14 bps/y?

That's a heck of a swing, about 3.5% of total return, in the 2.5 years between those two start dates.
Whoops - I had used VIVAX since I saw that in your original post, but I just realized that VIVAX is investor shares. When I re-ran just now using VVIAX (admiral) it shows that the admiral fund has the exact same CAGR as the ETF going back to inception. So it sounds like a tie on that comparison.
User avatar
tetractys
Posts: 6249
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:30 pm
Location: Along the Salish Sea

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by tetractys »

Bill Bernstein wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 7:01 pm... There are two possible explanations for this: “Drip drag” (delayed reinvestment of dividends) doesn’t make sense, since if stocks return 10% pa, that’s about 4bp per trading day on the dividend amount, which calculates out to much less than 0.1 bp.

The other explanation, suggested to me by Rick Ferri, is the time difference between ETF closing calculation and mutual fund closing calculation. If this is the real explanation, then is there an inherent bias favoring the open end fund over the ETF?
Hi Bill, nice to see you posting here.

Well I'm glad to see this subject brought up because in the past when I owned the ETF DLS (Wisdom Tree proxy for international small value), and Vanguard's emerging market ETF, I was always frustrated at the seemingly unfavorable way distributions were reinvested. Not being any kind of authority, it was just an uncomfortable hunch I couldn't put my finger on. It never seemed I was getting a fair price and I always felt I was getting shorted. I brought it up on this forum once or twice I think, without much response. Anyway ETFs are a thing of the past for me, largely because of my suspicions about shadowy reinvestment arbitrage. So it's nice to FINALLY see some intelligent people illuminating the subject and looking for an explanation.

THX :happy
UpperNwGuy
Posts: 9479
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2017 7:16 pm

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by UpperNwGuy »

tetractys wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 8:05 pm Anyway ETFs are a thing of the past for me, largely because of my suspicions about shadowy reinvestment arbitrage.
You are confusing me. Please elaborate on your phrase "shadowy reinvestment arbitrage."
Topic Author
Bill Bernstein
Posts: 853
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:47 am

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by Bill Bernstein »

Oooh. I know just what tetractys means. If the manager takes a few days to reinvest . . .

I'd never thought of that one.

Bill
loghound
Posts: 368
Joined: Thu May 09, 2019 7:01 pm

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by loghound »

It's good to confirm this -- When I first started investing in ETF's the consensus (even from Jack Bogle) was that the ETF version were the same (but with possible tax advantages in some cases) and the only 'downside' was the spread (which for these big vanguard funds is pretty small)

I'm glad to see this appears to be true.
I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time. | - Blaise Pascal
User avatar
EngCapt1
Posts: 229
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2016 11:02 pm

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by EngCapt1 »

Bill Bernstein wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 7:01 pm I’d be interested to see what other BH’s think. Because of sheer inertia, I've always favored Admiral over ETFs, but now maybe there's some data in back of that inertia.
I tried switching to ETF's a few years back, didn't last very long for me. Even if the Vanguard ETF's did return slightly more than the mutual fund version, I'm confident my behavior negated that gain. I found myself trying to time my purchases, sometimes even delaying purchases for a few days after pay day. I quickly figured out that wasn't for me, and I switched back to the mutual fund shares for the auto investment feature.

:oops:
Retired Firefighter | 65% Equities/35% TSP G Fund
tomsense76
Posts: 1428
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2020 1:52 am

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by tomsense76 »

Building on absolute zero's analysis...
  • How much does the result vary if the start date is changed?
  • How does the result change for a shorter period of time (like 5yrs)?
"Anyone who claims to understand quantum theory is either lying or crazy" -- Richard Feynman
TropikThunder
Posts: 3918
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 5:41 pm

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by TropikThunder »

Bill Bernstein wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:04 pm Oooh. I know just what tetractys means. If the manager takes a few days to reinvest . . .

I'd never thought of that one.

Bill
Which "manager" are you referring to? The fund manager doesn't have anything to do with reinvesting dividends to my account, do they? That's all on the brokerage.
Apathizer
Posts: 2507
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2021 2:56 pm

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by Apathizer »

UpperNwGuy wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 8:12 pm
tetractys wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 8:05 pm Anyway ETFs are a thing of the past for me, largely because of my suspicions about shadowy reinvestment arbitrage.
You are confusing me. Please elaborate on your phrase "shadowy reinvestment arbitrage."
I'm curious about this myself. If anything ETFs seem more transparent and simpler than MFs, though I think both are fine.
ROTH: 50% AVGE, 10% DFAX, 40% BNDW. Taxable: 50% BNDW, 40% AVGE, 10% DFAX.
Jags4186
Posts: 8198
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 7:12 pm

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by Jags4186 »

The real question is when are you buying the ETF vs the Admiral fund.

Let’s take a 10 year return Jan 1, 2012 - Dec 31, 2021.

It’s very easy to have your MF money invested in that time frame. Place your buy order on 12/30/11 and you’re money will be invested at the closing NAV and ready to go on market open Jan 3. 2012.

If you want to buy VTI though you would buy on 1/3/12. VTI closed on 12/30/11 at 64.30 but opened on 1/3/12 at 65.41, with a range of trading of 65.14 - 65.52. If you bought VTI on 1/3/12 you lost between 1-2% vs the mutual fund that you’ll never get back.

Of course this can go the other way as well, but when looking at a few static investment time periods as Dr. Bernstein does, where you start matters.
drk
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:33 pm

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by drk »

Bill Bernstein wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 7:01 pm Just for chuckles, I compared the returns as of 1/18 for the first 9 Admiral/ETF pairs that came to mind.
In each and every case, the Admiral class shares beat the ETF shares. In each case, I chose the longest Morningstar eval period:
VTSAX/VTI 10 bp over 15 years
VFIAX/VOO 17 bp over 10 years
VEUSX/VGK 7 bp over 15 years
VPADX/VPL 12 bp over 15 years
VEMAX/VWO 4 bp over 15 years
VIVAX/VTV 9 bp over 15 years
VSIAX/VBR 23 bp over 10 years
VIMAX/VO 12 bp over 15 years
VTIAX/VXUS 17 bp over 10 years
Can you say more about how you arrived at these numbers? I pulled up Morningstar's Growth of $10k chart for VTSAX/VTI over the 15 years ending 2022-01-18, and it has VTI with the tiny edge cumulatively (335.50% vs 335.28%):

Image

In case it helps, here are Portfolio Visualizer links comparing performance for each pair from the inception of the younger fund through EOY 2021 (H2H result using PV-reported CAGR):
The greater parity here makes me curious about the numbers in the OP. As livesoft noted, the actual ETF performance will depend on brokers' DRIP mechanics (Portfolio Visualizer only says that dividends are reinvested, not how/when), whereas that's out of your hands with the mutual fund.
A useful razor: anyone asking about speculative strategies on Bogleheads.org has no business using them.
vtsnowdin
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2021 2:54 pm

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by vtsnowdin »

Jags4186 wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 5:14 am The real question is when are you buying the ETF vs the Admiral fund.

Let’s take a 10 year return Jan 1, 2012 - Dec 31, 2021.

It’s very easy to have your MF money invested in that time frame. Place your buy order on 12/30/11 and you’re money will be invested at the closing NAV and ready to go on market open Jan 3. 2012.

If you want to buy VTI though you would buy on 1/3/12. VTI closed on 12/30/11 at 64.30 but opened on 1/3/12 at 65.41, with a range of trading of 65.14 - 65.52. If you bought VTI on 1/3/12 you lost between 1-2% vs the mutual fund that you’ll never get back.

Of course this can go the other way as well, but when looking at a few static investment time periods as Dr. Bernstein does, where you start matters.
I do not follow you on that one. If investor A buys $10,000 of a MF on 12/31/11 and investor B buys $10,000 of VTI on 1/4/12 they both have $10,000 invested,only at slightly different prices per share. Investor B has lost nothing.
If you are considering the "lost opportunity" of that one or two days trading investor B could have bought in on 12/29/11 and reversed it. All depends on which way the market goes for those few days or business hours.
Jags4186
Posts: 8198
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 7:12 pm

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by Jags4186 »

vtsnowdin wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 10:57 am
Jags4186 wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 5:14 am The real question is when are you buying the ETF vs the Admiral fund.

Let’s take a 10 year return Jan 1, 2012 - Dec 31, 2021.

It’s very easy to have your MF money invested in that time frame. Place your buy order on 12/30/11 and you’re money will be invested at the closing NAV and ready to go on market open Jan 3. 2012.

If you want to buy VTI though you would buy on 1/3/12. VTI closed on 12/30/11 at 64.30 but opened on 1/3/12 at 65.41, with a range of trading of 65.14 - 65.52. If you bought VTI on 1/3/12 you lost between 1-2% vs the mutual fund that you’ll never get back.

Of course this can go the other way as well, but when looking at a few static investment time periods as Dr. Bernstein does, where you start matters.
I do not follow you on that one. If investor A buys $10,000 of a MF on 12/31/11 and investor B buys $10,000 of VTI on 1/4/12 they both have $10,000 invested,only at slightly different prices per share. Investor B has lost nothing.
If you are considering the "lost opportunity" of that one or two days trading investor B could have bought in on 12/29/11 and reversed it. All depends on which way the market goes for those few days or business hours.
What I am saying is that in practical terms, when comparing returns of ETFs and mutual funds, one must consider actual entry and exit points. And in the case of ETFs you can't just look at market open prices on day 1 and market close price on day 365 and say they performed identically or within 3 or 4 bps of each other over the course of a year. You could be 100-200 bps off--in either direction mind you--simply based on mechanics of purchasing an ETF.

Hope that makes sense.
vtsnowdin
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2021 2:54 pm

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by vtsnowdin »

Jags4186 wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:13 am
vtsnowdin wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 10:57 am
Jags4186 wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 5:14 am The real question is when are you buying the ETF vs the Admiral fund.

Let’s take a 10 year return Jan 1, 2012 - Dec 31, 2021.

It’s very easy to have your MF money invested in that time frame. Place your buy order on 12/30/11 and you’re money will be invested at the closing NAV and ready to go on market open Jan 3. 2012.

If you want to buy VTI though you would buy on 1/3/12. VTI closed on 12/30/11 at 64.30 but opened on 1/3/12 at 65.41, with a range of trading of 65.14 - 65.52. If you bought VTI on 1/3/12 you lost between 1-2% vs the mutual fund that you’ll never get back.

Of course this can go the other way as well, but when looking at a few static investment time periods as Dr. Bernstein does, where you start matters.
I do not follow you on that one. If investor A buys $10,000 of a MF on 12/31/11 and investor B buys $10,000 of VTI on 1/4/12 they both have $10,000 invested,only at slightly different prices per share. Investor B has lost nothing.
If you are considering the "lost opportunity" of that one or two days trading investor B could have bought in on 12/29/11 and reversed it. All depends on which way the market goes for those few days or business hours.
What I am saying is that in practical terms, when comparing returns of ETFs and mutual funds, one must consider actual entry and exit points. And in the case of ETFs you can't just look at market open prices on day 1 and market close price on day 365 and say they performed identically or within 3 or 4 bps of each other over the course of a year. You could be 100-200 bps off--in either direction mind you--simply based on mechanics of purchasing an ETF.

Hope that makes sense.
Yes it makes sense but if you buy and hold for say ten years will that be the diffidence in performance of any two funds? .
For example $10,000 put into VTI ten years ago would now be $35,588 While $10,000 put into VWO would only be worth $12,070.
User avatar
David Jay
Posts: 14587
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 5:54 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by David Jay »

vtsnowdin wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:32 amFor example $10,000 put into VTI ten years ago would now be $35,588 While $10,000 put into VWO would only be worth $12,070.
The admiral share class of VTI is VTSAX, not VWO. So that is not an apples-to-apples comparison for the purpose of this thread (which compares the ETF class to the Admiral class of the same fund).

As of today, Morningstar says the 10 year gain (total return) of $10,000 in VTI is $30,701, the 10 year gain (total return) of $10,000 in VTSAX is $30,682. For a $19 difference over 10 years.
It's not an engineering problem - Hersh Shefrin | To get the "risk premium", you really do have to take the risk - nisiprius
vtsnowdin
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2021 2:54 pm

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by vtsnowdin »

David Jay wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 1:11 pm
vtsnowdin wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:32 amFor example $10,000 put into VTI ten years ago would now be $35,588 While $10,000 put into VWO would only be worth $12,070.
The admiral share class of VTI is VTSAX, not VWO. So that is not an apples-to-apples comparison for the purpose of this thread (which compares the ETF class to the Admiral class of the same fund).

As of today, Morningstar says the 10 year gain (total return) of $10,000 in VTI is $30,701, the 10 year gain (total return) of $10,000 in VTSAX is $30,682. For a $19 difference over 10 years.
Point taken.
Topic Author
Bill Bernstein
Posts: 853
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:47 am

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by Bill Bernstein »

John Rekenthaler pointed out a flaw in my original method, which was using daily returns, which he tells me are unreliable; you have to use the monthlies.

When you do, ending 12/31, here's what you get:

VTSAX/VTI 10.70/10.69 over 15 years
VFIAX/VOO 16.51/16.52 over 10 years
VEUSX/VGl 3.90/3.84 over 15 years
VPADX/VPL 3.99/3.91 over 15 years
VEMAX/VWO 4.51/4.48 over 15 years
VVIAX/VTV 8.08/8.08 over 15 years
VSIAX/VBR 8.57/8.61 over 15 years
VIMAX/VO 10.33/10.31 over 15 years
VTIAX/VXUS 7.68/7.62 over 10 years

Not quite as dramatic as before: advantage MF in 6 cases (average 4 bp), ETF in 2 (average 2.5 bp) and tie in 1.

So my original point, that ETFs are inferior to MFs, gets shot down, but another point still remains: the supposed 1 bp advantage of ETF over plain vanilla fund is a non-issue.

Bill
CedarWaxWing
Posts: 883
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 11:24 am

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by CedarWaxWing »

Bill Bernstein wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 7:41 pm Thanks for the visualizer data.

Comparing the two, I have to wonder if there isn't some sort of bias in one or the other database. For example, for VTV/VVIAX, the 15 year data shows the Admiral fund up by 9 bp, starting in early 2007 but visualizer, i assume, starts with incep in mid-2004, shows the ETF up by 14 bps/y?

That's a heck of a swing, about 3.5% of total return, in the 2.5 years between those two start dates.

Or, alternatively, this may have been a relatively recent change in the way that Vanguard operates the different classes?

Be interested to see what others find and think.

Bill
I have done the M* approach for checking the Admiral vs ETF shares.... and sometimes find myself accidently harvesting trailing returns from different periods. Using daily for one, last month or last quarter for another, in any combination. Using the ETF price value vs NAV value often varies by small amounts but can also be a source of variance between the two.

I checked the numbers for VTSAX vs VTI, and VSIAX vs VBR and came up with the following.... Showing on a spreadsheet, since I find my self making all kinds of transcribing errors harvesting numbers from M* tables.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
aristotelian
Posts: 12277
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:05 pm

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by aristotelian »

Bill,
Are the bps numbers you posted cumulative or annualized? From the way you phrased it, it sounds like cumulative. 20 basis points over 10-15 years seems like noise to me but it is odd that it seems to be pretty consistent.
User avatar
grabiner
Advisory Board
Posts: 35307
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Columbia, MD

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by grabiner »

Bill Bernstein wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:06 pm John Rekenthaler pointed out a flaw in my original method, which was using daily returns, which he tells me are unreliable; you have to use the monthlies.

When you do, ending 12/31, here's what you get:

VTSAX/VTI 10.70/10.69 over 15 years
VFIAX/VOO 16.51/16.52 over 10 years
VEUSX/VGl 3.90/3.84 over 15 years
VPADX/VPL 3.99/3.91 over 15 years
VEMAX/VWO 4.51/4.48 over 15 years
VVIAX/VTV 8.08/8.08 over 15 years
VSIAX/VBR 8.57/8.61 over 15 years
VIMAX/VO 10.33/10.31 over 15 years
VTIAX/VXUS 7.68/7.62 over 10 years

Not quite as dramatic as before: advantage MF in 6 cases (average 4 bp), ETF in 2 (average 2.5 bp) and tie in 1.

So my original point, that ETFs are inferior to MFs, gets shot down, but another point still remains: the supposed 1 bp advantage of ETF over plain vanilla fund is a non-issue.
I notice that the international funds all come out ahead with the mutual fund class. Is this possibly the result of the mutual fund class having made a fair-value adjustment which didn't match the ETF prices on 12/31/2006? If the fair-value adjustment had the ETFs at a 0.60% premium then, and at no premium or discount on 12/31/2021, then the 15-year mutual fund returns would be 0.04% higher assuming the same actual returns.
Wiki David Grabiner
User avatar
arcticpineapplecorp.
Posts: 15081
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:22 pm

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by arcticpineapplecorp. »

thank you for posting this Dr. Bernstein and everyone who has responded with their thoughts, comparisons, etc. This is a very interesting topic in light of wondering recently if I was a sucker sticking with MFs when others talked about buying ETFs at below NAV and I was left wondering if that were possible to do consistently which surely would lead to outperformance relative to MFs.

looks like MF had the advantage 2/3rds of the time (6 out of 9). That could change in the future, and even if that outperformance persists, it would only be classified as negligible/nonsignifcant based on the amount of outperformance.

since we're not sure what may have accounted for the difference, is it possible someone could contact Vanguard to shed light/provide an explanation? Would John Rekenthaler be able to interview someone at Vanguard if this topic might lead to a morningstar article?
It's hard to accept the truth when the lies were exactly what you wanted to hear. Investing is simple, but not easy. Buy, hold & rebalance low cost index funds & manage taxable events. Asking Portfolio Questions | Wiki
User avatar
Wiggums
Posts: 7051
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 7:02 am

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by Wiggums »

retired@50 wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 7:30 pm in my case I've been using Admiral shares as a guardrail to stay away from intra-day trading.
Same here, 100%
"I started with nothing and I still have most of it left."
User avatar
Gas Exchange
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2021 9:18 pm

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by Gas Exchange »

I just found this thread.

Coincidentally, just a few days ago I used Morningstar data to compare a series of Vanguard MF Admiral v ETF pairs as I am about to deploy a lump sum and wanted to understand the difference in performance. Many BH and other observers have focused on the currently lower ER of ETF as rationale for their superiority, but as there are many moving parts under the hood, hidden from view, the outcome of relative performance seems more relevant. I looked at both market price and NAV annual performance for the ETF as these are separately reported on Morningstar. However, as I'm not clear which market price is used (for example opening market price on Jan 1 to closing market price on Dec 31), there is some uncertainty. And while you buy and sell an ETF at market price, if you're a long-term investor, in the interim your DRIP I presume is bought at NAV. So do you really know which regime you are living under (what are the mechanics invisible to you)?

In any case my conclusion was performance-wise pretty much a wash, nothing systematic. Sometimes MF did better, sometimes ETF. But I think I have more confidence that the MF numbers represent the MF investors outcome, whereas the ETF data are a bit less transparent (at least to me). I presume the buy-and-hold will live somewhere btwn the Mkt Price and NAV performance, depending on the exact mechanics of both purchasing, DRIP and selling.

Here are just two examples of many:

Return: MF Admiral / ETF (Mkt Price) / ETF (NAV)
VVIAX v VTV:
2021 26.49 26.52 26.57
2020 2.29 2.26 2.23
2019 25.82 25.65 25.85

Return: MF Admiral / ETF (Mkt Price) / ETF (NAV)
VTIAX v VXUS:
2021 8.62 9.00 8.69
2020 11.28 10.69 11.32
2019 21.51 21.75 21.58
drk
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:33 pm

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by drk »

Bill Bernstein wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:06 pm John Rekenthaler pointed out a flaw in my original method, which was using daily returns, which he tells me are unreliable; you have to use the monthlies.
Would you mind updating your OP? Given your stature, others continue to point to this thread, and there's no indication that the data presented above is flawed.
A useful razor: anyone asking about speculative strategies on Bogleheads.org has no business using them.
User avatar
watchnerd
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:18 am
Location: Gig Harbor, WA, USA

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by watchnerd »

Bill Bernstein wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 7:01 pm Hi all:

Just for chuckles, I compared the returns as of 1/18 for the first 9 Admiral/ETF pairs that came to mind.
In each and every case, the Admiral class shares beat the ETF shares. In each case, I chose the longest Morningstar eval period:
VTSAX/VTI 10 bp over 15 years
That doesn't seem to match the situation any longer; if I compare VTI to VTSAX using the Morningstar interactive graph and set the timeframe to Max.

VTSAX +179,825.90 | +1,798.26%

VTI +179,894.99 | +1,798.95%

VTI seems to be ahead by a hair.

Things seem to have changed in the last 15 years
Global stocks, IG/HY bonds, gold & digital assets at market weights 75% / 19% / 6% || LMP: TIPS ladder
User avatar
Que1999
Posts: 274
Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 10:27 am

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by Que1999 »

watchnerd wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 3:27 pm
Bill Bernstein wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 7:01 pm Hi all:

Just for chuckles, I compared the returns as of 1/18 for the first 9 Admiral/ETF pairs that came to mind.
In each and every case, the Admiral class shares beat the ETF shares. In each case, I chose the longest Morningstar eval period:
VTSAX/VTI 10 bp over 15 years
That doesn't seem to match the situation any longer; if I compare VTI to VTSAX using the Morningstar interactive graph and set the timeframe to Max.

VTSAX +179,825.90 | +1,798.26%

VTI +179,894.99 | +1,798.95%

VTI seems to be ahead by a hair.

Things seem to have changed in the last 15 years
So, is it fair to say it's time to convert my MF, especially my VTIAX holdings, to ETF?
:confused
lazynovice
Posts: 3370
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 10:48 pm
Location: Denver area. Former Texan.

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by lazynovice »

Que1999 wrote: Sat Jun 11, 2022 7:24 am
watchnerd wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 3:27 pm
Bill Bernstein wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 7:01 pm Hi all:

Just for chuckles, I compared the returns as of 1/18 for the first 9 Admiral/ETF pairs that came to mind.
In each and every case, the Admiral class shares beat the ETF shares. In each case, I chose the longest Morningstar eval period:
VTSAX/VTI 10 bp over 15 years
That doesn't seem to match the situation any longer; if I compare VTI to VTSAX using the Morningstar interactive graph and set the timeframe to Max.

VTSAX +179,825.90 | +1,798.26%

VTI +179,894.99 | +1,798.95%

VTI seems to be ahead by a hair.

Things seem to have changed in the last 15 years
So, is it fair to say it's time to convert my MF, especially my VTIAX holdings, to ETF?
:confused
Would you really make a change over $70 over the max time frame? Bottom line of this thread is that the differences are tiny and vary depending on time period and whether you use daily or monthly data and that tells me enough that this is inconsequential, Bogle-heady type stuff. If you like mutual funds, use them and if you like ETFs, use those. I use the ETFs.
User avatar
grabiner
Advisory Board
Posts: 35307
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Columbia, MD

Re: Admiral vs ETFs: Some Numbers

Post by grabiner »

Que1999 wrote: Sat Jun 11, 2022 7:24 am
watchnerd wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 3:27 pm
Bill Bernstein wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 7:01 pm Hi all:

Just for chuckles, I compared the returns as of 1/18 for the first 9 Admiral/ETF pairs that came to mind.
In each and every case, the Admiral class shares beat the ETF shares. In each case, I chose the longest Morningstar eval period:
VTSAX/VTI 10 bp over 15 years
That doesn't seem to match the situation any longer; if I compare VTI to VTSAX using the Morningstar interactive graph and set the timeframe to Max.

VTSAX +179,825.90 | +1,798.26%

VTI +179,894.99 | +1,798.95%

VTI seems to be ahead by a hair.

Things seem to have changed in the last 15 years
So, is it fair to say it's time to convert my MF, especially my VTIAX holdings, to ETF?
:confused
Not necessarily. If you expect to gain 0.01% per year, that is $10 on a $100K investment. The convenience of mutual funds over ETFs could be worth more than $10 to you.

I prefer mutual funds over ETFs, because trading ETFs is less convenient. Therefore, I still hold a lot of my portfolio in Vanguard mutual funds with ETF share classes. I use ETFs when there is no mutual fund, or when the mutual fund is much more expensive (I bought FTSE All-World Ex-US Small-Cap as an ETF from the start; at that time, the mutual fund had a purchase fee and no Admiral share class.)
Wiki David Grabiner
Post Reply