"paying yourself interest" and "double taxation" are both illusions. Ironically, two wrongs can make a right, in that the illusion of paying yourself interest might tempt you into a situation that incurs double taxation.
To find your way out of the trap, first consider a scenario in which your 401k is invested in a bond fund yielding 3%, your 401k loan rate is 3%, and your commercial loan alternative is 3%. Determine the impacts on your 401k and your wallet. Once you've thought that through (and no sooner), try adjusting all the numbers. Then construct a scenario in which you would take a 401k loan rather than a commercial loan, and deduce the impact on both your 401k and your wallet.
Search found 7389 matches
- Mon May 09, 2022 9:19 am
- Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General
- Topic: Why do 401k loans charge interest?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 3208
- Sun Jan 10, 2021 12:40 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Portfolio review
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1327
Re: Portfolio review
Thanks. Yes, 22% is good but the high state tax makes it 31%. I can't think of any states we'd move to with a higher income tax (the west coast is out of the question). As noted, I did follow the Roth course last year, when the tax rate was certain.
Also, I'd like to increase cash on hand and I need to contribute $18,000 to the 403b to get the full match so Roth 403b would require $26,000 of gross income to meet that threshold. I looked that up after posting. Hadn't thought about being prisoner of a terrific employer match. I'll consider whether it makes sense to cut 403b contributions back to $18,000 for a few years to accumulate cash. We'd still be saving $30,000 + employer $24,000 = $54,000 in retirement plans.
Also, I'd like to increase cash on hand and I need to contribute $18,000 to the 403b to get the full match so Roth 403b would require $26,000 of gross income to meet that threshold. I looked that up after posting. Hadn't thought about being prisoner of a terrific employer match. I'll consider whether it makes sense to cut 403b contributions back to $18,000 for a few years to accumulate cash. We'd still be saving $30,000 + employer $24,000 = $54,000 in retirement plans.
- Sun Jan 10, 2021 11:02 am
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Portfolio review
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1327
Re: Portfolio review
The island has utilities and water. There are seasonal cabins on the other lots. But it's a stone's throw from protected land so it's a low population area.
- Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:41 am
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Portfolio review
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1327
Re: Portfolio review
"island property" wasn't intended to mean "island" However, I have long admired the whole-island properties in Thousand Islands, Maine, etc.
In any case, island lots in the wilderness yoyo in valuation by a factor of five. Right now it's at about 40% of the valuation in 2008 but it's 2X the valuation in 2010!
- Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:36 am
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Portfolio review
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1327
Re: Portfolio review
Yes. Effectively self-insured on life, as discussed later in the thread. But I have the other two.
- Sun Jan 10, 2021 8:31 am
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Portfolio review
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1327
Re: Portfolio review
Good advice. Unpredictability is exactly why I'm not rushing into Roth conversions. If I lose my job tomorrow, I'll have lots of years for low-tax Roth conversions. If I die tomorrow, my wife has enough to live on and she would surely move to a smaller house in a lower tax state almost immediately. In unrelated news, she's always leaving roller skates on the stairs.David Jay wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 8:11 am 1. 10 years is a very long time in our age bracket (early 60s). I started to do detailed, long term retirement planning at age 58, I was “outa’ there” by 62. Health issues can easily intervene, but so can the flow of time and life. Perfect will probably not last and you need to be prepared to be flexible.
- Sun Jan 10, 2021 8:21 am
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Portfolio review
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1327
- Sun Jan 10, 2021 8:17 am
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Portfolio review
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1327
Re: Portfolio review
Your HSA balance is low (~$23k) and your 2021 planned contribution is $6k. Your maximum 2021 HSA contribution for family coverage is $7.2k plus a $1k catch-up each for you and spouse at age 55+. Consider increasing your HSA contribution to $9.2k and using the account in retirement to pay healthcare costs/Medicare premiums. Note: spouse would need to open a separate HSA account to for spouse’s $1k catch-up contribution. Fidelity offers low-cost HSAs. Since OP employer matches 1K, that reduces amount OP can add to HSA by that amount. You are right though, can go upto 9.2-6-1=2.2k more could be added. Also, OP why use Int Explorer when you could use a lower cost VG Emerging Mkts Index fund? Thanks. On the first, I am maxing HSA, as you suspec...
- Sun Jan 10, 2021 8:12 am
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Portfolio review
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1327
Re: Portfolio review
You could look into a no-cost refi and can definitely shave a bunch off your payment with a refi without having to dip into unattractive options you mention. Have you run calculations in RPM or i-ORP to see the value of doing some Roth conversions along the way to mitigate a likely high RMD pushing you into a high tax bracket down the road> Thanks. I don't use those calculators but I certainly understand the issue and have done some modeling. I have a lot of experience with RMDs and conversions from trustee work for elderly people We were ineligible for Roth IRAs in the early days and then our marginal rate was insane throughout the decade we had kids in college and the phaseouts were killing us, so having any Roth at all is a new thing. G...
- Sun Jan 10, 2021 7:25 am
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Portfolio review
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1327
Portfolio review
Emergency funds: 6 months’ expenses in cash. Roth IRA if necessary, eligible to withdraw penalty-free from old 403b if necessary, $100,000 borrowable from old 401k and current 403b combined (yes, loan from old 401k is allowed; I know it’s a rare feature). Debt: $300k mortgage on $1M home, 3.375% fixed (13 years left) non-deductible (Standard Deduction, but that could of course change) Tax Filing Status: Married Filing Jointly Tax Rate: 22% Federal with no applicable phaseouts under current law 9ish% State (non-deductible – Standard Deduction) Ages: both 60ish Desired Asset Allocation: 50% stocks / 50% bonds Stock portion is 30% TSM, 6% Small Value, 11% Intl non-EM, 3% EM Total portfolio $2.3M Current retirement assets I can access pretty m...
- Sat Jun 01, 2019 6:02 am
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Roth v 401k at income levels
- Replies: 18
- Views: 2420
Re: Roth v 401k at income levels
"older workers are less likely than younger workers to lose their jobs"
The issue is more complicated than that, so both soundbites are misleading. It is indeed prudent to plan for a range of scenarios. If you do suffer a stretch of unemployment later in your career, it will have been prudent to have prioritized pre-tax savings. Many arguments that favor Roth are bottomed on the "You'll regret ending up too wealthy" premise.
https://www.urban.org/sites/default/fil ... oyment.PDF
- Tue May 28, 2019 5:03 am
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Roth 401k vs Trad 401K based on current income / tax
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1247
- Sun May 06, 2018 7:33 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Quick one re: Liquidating ESPP Purchases to Diversify
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1037
- Fri Mar 02, 2018 7:39 pm
- Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General
- Topic: Double tax on IRA accounts to heirs
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1911
Re: Double tax on IRA accounts to heirs
Person A paid perhaps $135,000 (Federal + State + FICA) in order to invest $100,000. The growth results would be lower for Person A for the same investments due to tax drag. Well not FICA, those taxes are not avoided by using IRA, 401K, etc. But would probably need more that $135K before tax in order to invest $100K. I would've paid about 33% in state and federal income tax on my tax deferred investments. This would be $50,000 in taxes on $150,000, thus the choice would be $150K tax deferred vs. $100K taxable. Thus the IRA account balance would be $1.5 million vs. $1 million in the taxable account (assuming there were no taxes on dividends or capital gains over the entire time that the original investor owned it). B's heir would be require...
- Fri Mar 02, 2018 4:16 am
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: IRA phaseout range
- Replies: 4
- Views: 830
- Wed Feb 28, 2018 7:20 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Max 401k or contribute to ESPP
- Replies: 40
- Views: 5447
- Wed Feb 28, 2018 12:16 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Max 401k or contribute to ESPP
- Replies: 40
- Views: 5447
Re: Max 401k or contribute to ESPP
There is no motivation to hold. The 17.6% certain return is, for a 6-month plan period, over 90% annualized. Holding puts that at risk. The discount portion is taxed as ordinary income. Sometimes people get confused by the LTCG rules and think there's a mathematical reason to hold. There isn't.
- Wed Feb 28, 2018 8:26 am
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Max 401k or contribute to ESPP
- Replies: 40
- Views: 5447
Re: Max 401k or contribute to ESPP
More of a winning bet than a test. The max-and-dump people are in the wise minority. Everybody else does the arithmetic wrong.
OP, there is no sacrifice in exploiting two good deals, as several posters have explained. Max your ESPP so you can retire earlier.
- Tue Feb 27, 2018 7:15 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Thoughts on an ESPP with 2 year contribution period?
- Replies: 29
- Views: 2758
Re: Thoughts on an ESPP with 2 year contribution period?
Always contribute the maximum.
- Tue Feb 27, 2018 7:13 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Max 401k or contribute to ESPP
- Replies: 40
- Views: 5447
Re: Max 401k or contribute to ESPP
90% annualized.
- Tue Feb 27, 2018 3:44 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Max 401k or contribute to ESPP
- Replies: 40
- Views: 5447
Re: Max 401k or contribute to ESPP
This is a false choice. An ESPP is merely a cash flow pipe; it delays a small portion of your pay for six months and adds 17.6%. You should be able to do both.
ESPP's usually have modest and flat overhead cost, so be sure to max it out every period so this is a negligible factor.
ESPP's usually have modest and flat overhead cost, so be sure to max it out every period so this is a negligible factor.
- Tue Feb 27, 2018 7:28 am
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Thoughts on an ESPP with 2 year contribution period?
- Replies: 29
- Views: 2758
Re: Thoughts on an ESPP with 2 year contribution period?
I love it when the first reply is the best reply. Well done.ThriftyPhD wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:34 am Assuming you're contributing each pay period, some of your money will be tied up for 2 years, some less, with an average of 1 year. If you think of this as a bond fund with an average duration of 1 year and a 17.6% return, it's a pretty good deal. Even if the entire amount went in on day one and sat for two years, that's > 8% annual return. That's assuming you get 15% off the price you can sell for. If it is 15% off the lowest price, and the stock goes up, then your have potential for even greater upside. How are dividends handled?
Note, I'm no expert on ESPP, hopefully someone will chime in if this is not the correct way to think about it.
- Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:55 pm
- Forum: Personal Finance (Not Investing)
- Topic: student loan vs investing
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1327
- Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:41 pm
- Forum: Personal Finance (Not Investing)
- Topic: student loan vs investing
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1327
Re: student loan vs investing
3.9% unless there's a 2% state tax implied
And you pay tax on bond interest, so the relevant rate is 5% unless we're comparing to tax-free bonds.
And you pay tax on bond interest, so the relevant rate is 5% unless we're comparing to tax-free bonds.
- Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:31 pm
- Forum: Personal Finance (Not Investing)
- Topic: student loan vs investing
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1327
Re: student loan vs investing
Student loan interest is an above-the-line deduction, not an itemized deduction.willthrill81 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 18, 2018 3:48 pmWill you have enough other expenses to pass up the now higher standard deduction ($12k for singles and $24k for married filing jointly)? You'll only have about $1,250 of student loan interest to deduct.
- Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:30 pm
- Forum: Personal Finance (Not Investing)
- Topic: student loan vs investing
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1327
Re: student loan vs investing
Check your math.
Debt should always be compared to bonds, as explained on the wiki.
You are considering taxes only on the loan side. Therefore you must be assuming a tax-free investment. The Intermediate Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund has an SEC yield of 2.16%.
- Sat Feb 17, 2018 3:18 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Investing vs paying off debt
- Replies: 28
- Views: 2838
Re: Investing vs paying off debt
Tax Rate: 24% Federal, 6.25% State
Heath Insurance $439.72
Dental Insurance $197.17
Vision $46.58
Flex Spending $129.00
These numbers all seem wrong to me. Your tax rates are 22% federal 5.1% state. Your dental and vision seem nutty high (9X mine), but in any case you should be paying these with pre-tax dollars withheld from your paycheck so they are free of income and payroll taxes totaling about 35%, so you should multiply by 0.65 to make your math consistent with respect to post-tax expenses. Your flex spending should be at least $200 ($400 if you both have access to an FSA).
Heath Insurance $439.72
Dental Insurance $197.17
Vision $46.58
Flex Spending $129.00
These numbers all seem wrong to me. Your tax rates are 22% federal 5.1% state. Your dental and vision seem nutty high (9X mine), but in any case you should be paying these with pre-tax dollars withheld from your paycheck so they are free of income and payroll taxes totaling about 35%, so you should multiply by 0.65 to make your math consistent with respect to post-tax expenses. Your flex spending should be at least $200 ($400 if you both have access to an FSA).
- Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:17 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: 401k pre-tax, Roth, or a blend?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 2117
Re: 401k pre-tax, Roth, or a blend?
Yeah but they have to FIT in the 12% bracket, meaning that you have to get your earned income low enough to give yourself the headroom.
- Mon Feb 12, 2018 7:30 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: 401k pre-tax, Roth, or a blend?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 2117
Re: 401k pre-tax, Roth, or a blend?
$5,000 pre-tax will consume $5,000 gross. $5,000 Roth in the same tax bracket would consume $6,920 gross and throw away $1,920 in taxes. My point was only that you make sure you are making this comparison when you decide how much to save and how much to pay in taxes.
- Mon Feb 12, 2018 4:29 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Pay bump, time to switch Roth to Traditional?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1815
Re: Pay bump, time to switch Roth to Traditional?
Thanks, good to know. I wonder if other states will reconsider the tax-deductible Roth IRA. When I originally looked into this issue, the context was immediate exploitation (via immediate conversion), but in the course of researching it I was surprised by both the number of states that exempt retirement income, and by the dizzying variety of the exemptions.
- Mon Feb 12, 2018 3:41 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Pay bump, time to switch Roth to Traditional?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1815
Re: Pay bump, time to switch Roth to Traditional?
State taxes in Utah (5%) and Michigan (4.25%) are essentially equal. Michigan used to exempt $40,000 of retirement income, which favors traditional 401k, at least up to a point. I did not research Michigan taxes to see if this is still true -- the OP ought to study MI and UT tax treatment of withdrawals if those are the likely retirement spots. But 15% of $140K is only $21K which suggests that you were a long way from maxing out both 401ks. Note that $21k of Roth contributions can be $29,000 of traditional contributions with no change in savings rate. I used 23% average federal rate and 5% state tax for the calculation, because it appears the OP will straddle the 22% and 24% brackets (that is, $205,000 gross can't be more than about $175,0...
- Sun Feb 11, 2018 6:51 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: 401k pre-tax, Roth, or a blend?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 2117
Re: 401k pre-tax, Roth, or a blend?
You'll get better answers if you tell us what state you're in (since states tax Roth and traditional contributions and withdrawals differently) and how much you would contribute to Roth accounts vs. traditional at the same savings rate.
- Wed Feb 07, 2018 6:32 pm
- Forum: Personal Finance (Not Investing)
- Topic: Dad gave me money before filing bankruptcy
- Replies: 24
- Views: 5495
- Wed Feb 07, 2018 4:35 pm
- Forum: Personal Consumer Issues
- Topic: Jogging in the cold.
- Replies: 50
- Views: 5587
Re: Jogging in the cold.
Running at -10 F is fine but you shouldn't cross-country ski unless the temperature is above freezing.
- Fri Feb 02, 2018 5:23 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: ESPP Question [Employee Stock Purchase Plan]
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2672
Re: ESPP Question [Employee Stock Purchase Plan]
An ESPP isn't an investment really, it's more like a 3-month CD that pays 90%. Once you do without the cash for the first plan period, it is cash flow neutral and you're just taking the 90% yield. So you should invert your advice for anyone who needs the cash -- an ESPP is ideal for them.
- Fri Feb 02, 2018 10:23 am
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: ESPP Question [Employee Stock Purchase Plan]
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2672
Re: ESPP Question [Employee Stock Purchase Plan]
Annualized, it's over a 90% return. And low risk. Pretty good for idiots.
- Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:44 pm
- Forum: Personal Finance (Not Investing)
- Topic: A half year at full pay or a full year at half pay?
- Replies: 49
- Views: 6139
Re: A half year at full pay or a full year at half pay?
- You should definitely deny your children the adventure, learning, and broadening experience of a sabbatical so they can stay in the same school their whole lives, as God intended, because all learning happens in school.
- I'm sure you've done the math right, but do look very carefully at how taxes will determine the true cost of going to 3/4 pay for two calendar years.
- On the other hand, the best option for both adventure and finance could be taking the semester and doing something more intense than moving to a nicer school district.
- Mon Jan 08, 2018 2:34 pm
- Forum: Personal Finance (Not Investing)
- Topic: MA Short Term Capital Gains Rate (12%) and Stock Options
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2393
Re: MA Short Term Capital Gains Rate (12%) and Stock Options
It is wise to investigate the tax code of a destination state before accepting a job, so good job on that. MA's STCG rate is anomalous. However, you appear to be fixated on, what, a 3% difference in how your current compensation is taxed in your high tax state vs. how it will be taxed in MA? That's obviously the tiny tail of the giant dog of start-up risk/reward. As for deductibility, a lot of people have their hair on fire about pedestrian changes in the tax code, but this does seem to be gold medal hair-burning here. It seems likely your total marginal rate will be little changed, since the limitation on SALT deductibility is offset by rate reductions. Second, I am not an options expert, but I thought the bargain element of options was ta...
- Mon Jan 08, 2018 6:42 am
- Forum: Forum Issues and Administration
- Topic: Misuse of adverse when averse was meant
- Replies: 160
- Views: 24883
Re: Misuse of adverse when averse was meant
Potential employers want to know about my prior experience and previous experience, which are the best kinds of experience. (They also want to know that I have good communication skills.)
They also use the term "demonstrated experience", which reveals that they are bureaucrats stringing together words they don't understand.
The potential job will have a specific focus, which is better than a wide-ranging focus.
While during we're on this topic subject, I must and have to note and write verbally in words that a timeless classic is much better than a fleeting classic.
Speaking of classics, soon we'll all be Prometheus and Bob.
They also use the term "demonstrated experience", which reveals that they are bureaucrats stringing together words they don't understand.
The potential job will have a specific focus, which is better than a wide-ranging focus.
While during we're on this topic subject, I must and have to note and write verbally in words that a timeless classic is much better than a fleeting classic.
Speaking of classics, soon we'll all be Prometheus and Bob.
- Wed Jan 03, 2018 4:16 pm
- Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General
- Topic: Americans spend $1 billion annually in unnecessary state tax
- Replies: 147
- Views: 26879
Re: Americans spend $1 billion annually in unnecessary state tax
Please note that the thread is six years old, so check your state's current tax law to see if it has changed.
- Tue Jan 02, 2018 5:49 am
- Forum: Personal Finance (Not Investing)
- Topic: Embarrassment Preventing Retirement Work: A factor for you?
- Replies: 133
- Views: 17078
Re: Embarrassment Preventing Retirement Work: A factor for you?
Since you are known to be successful, you would elevate the standing and self-respect of your new work colleagues. Hopefully you would also displace an underperforming employee and make your employer more profitable.
- Fri Dec 29, 2017 8:05 pm
- Forum: Forum Issues and Administration
- Topic: anybody else notice that the timestamp of posts is off by 1 hour?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3447
Re: anybody else notice that the timestamp of posts is off by 1 hour?
nisiprius, please have my posts timestamped one year earlier than actual. I want to win that stock market prediction competition thingy.
- Fri Dec 29, 2017 7:15 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Will I be taxed again on my 401k?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 2871
Re: Will I be taxed again on my 401k?
Strictly speaking, PA doesn't tax your 401k contribution, it taxes your income. The maximum $18,500 401k contribution requires $19,070 of gross income, which PA taxes at 3% = $570, leaving $18,500.
- Fri Dec 29, 2017 7:05 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Will I be taxed again on my 401k?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 2871
Re: Will I be taxed again on my 401k?
Yes if you make all of your 401k contributions in PA and all of your 401k withdrawals in NC then you will pay 3% on contributions and 5.5% on withdrawals for a total of 8.5%, which is the same as doing both in MD and better than doing both in NYC or Oregon and worse than doing both in Texas or Illinois. I recommend you work in NC and retire in PA.
- Fri Dec 29, 2017 6:46 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Tax Bracket going from 15% to 22%. Should I change type of account to invest in for retirement?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 2549
Re: Tax Bracket going from 15% to 22%. Should I change type of account to invest in for retirement?
I'm unclear on why a $5,500 Roth contribution converts to a $5,500 403b contribution.
At a 30% tax rate a $5,500 Roth contribution consumes $7,857 of gross income, so it is equivalent to a $7,857 403b contribution. However, the $7,857 is not accurate because a portion of the gross income falls into the 12% bracket.
Working the math the other way, a $5,500 403b contribution increment is needed to drop out of the 22% federal bracket. At this point the OP, based on past saving performance, can still save another $1,600 or so of gross income. At his new tax rate of 18%, this yields $1,300 post-tax to put in a Roth IRA. Have cake. Eat cake.
At a 30% tax rate a $5,500 Roth contribution consumes $7,857 of gross income, so it is equivalent to a $7,857 403b contribution. However, the $7,857 is not accurate because a portion of the gross income falls into the 12% bracket.
Working the math the other way, a $5,500 403b contribution increment is needed to drop out of the 22% federal bracket. At this point the OP, based on past saving performance, can still save another $1,600 or so of gross income. At his new tax rate of 18%, this yields $1,300 post-tax to put in a Roth IRA. Have cake. Eat cake.
- Fri Dec 29, 2017 6:24 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Will I be taxed again on my 401k?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 2871
Re: Will I be taxed again on my 401k?
I think only Pennsylvania taxes 401k contributions (NJ and MA tax IRA contributions, and NJ taxes 403b contributions). More than half the states have no income tax or have a tax but exempt all or a portion of retirement plan withdrawals. In many states you will want to study these exemptions carefully before making withdrawals, rollovers, or conversions, since your retirement state may favor one type of account over another, or may favor distributing your withdrawals across several types of accounts. Good info. Your post promoted me to check and my state only partially taxes retirement distributions. State tax rate is already pretty low, but that’s still good to know. A lot of the information in this 6-year-old thread is outdated, but it m...
- Fri Dec 29, 2017 6:21 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Will I be taxed again on my 401k?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 2871
Re: Will I be taxed again on my 401k?
My undestanding is that your contributions to a pretax 401(k) plan reduce your taxable wages for federal income tax purposes only, not social security, Medicare, or state taxes. When you withdraw, you would only have to pay federal income tax and not other taxes. TravelforFun In almost every state with an income tax, 401k contributions are exempt. They reduce your AGI, MAGI, and taxable income, so they help you avoid AGI-based taxes like the ACA tax on investment income, MAGI-based tax effects like spousal IRA eligibility, and income tax, but not social security, Medicare, or the ACA tax on wages. I wouldn't say they "reduce your taxable wages" since income tax taxes income, not wages per se, which are part of income. For example...
- Fri Dec 29, 2017 6:13 pm
- Forum: Personal Investments
- Topic: Will I be taxed again on my 401k?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 2871
Re: Will I be taxed again on my 401k?
I think only Pennsylvania taxes 401k contributions (NJ and MA tax IRA contributions, and NJ taxes 403b contributions). More than half the states have no income tax or have a tax but exempt all or a portion of retirement plan withdrawals. In many states you will want to study these exemptions carefully before making withdrawals, rollovers, or conversions, since your retirement state may favor one type of account over another, or may favor distributing your withdrawals across several types of accounts.
- Fri Dec 29, 2017 3:31 pm
- Forum: Personal Finance (Not Investing)
- Topic: How to calculate tax savings of employer health insurance?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 1351
Re: How to calculate tax savings of employer health insurance?
Not sure what you mean by "averse" but I think you're referring to itemized deductions that are not relevant here. Moreover, 7.5% of AGI is the threshold (a minimum of sorts), not the max.
- Fri Dec 29, 2017 3:27 pm
- Forum: Personal Finance (Not Investing)
- Topic: How to calculate tax savings of employer health insurance?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 1351
Re: How to calculate tax savings of employer health insurance?
HSA and FSA are different. I am not an HSA expert but they are valuable -- see the wiki.iasw wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2017 3:21 pmYes to the high deductible with I think it was $6900/year? There's also a FSA available with maybe $2400/year? I have a lot of paperwork to sort through but that is a close estimate.Bob's not my name wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2017 3:15 pm Yeah, I think you're considering it correctly and I'm the one upside down.
If you forego the $927 premium your after-tax income increases by $667.
But now I'm curious about this high deductible. Does the employer offer a Health Savings Account with that high deductible plan?
The ACA limited FSA contributions to $2,500/year. There's an inflation adjustment so your employer may offer a slightly higher limit.
You can't do both FSA and HSA.